Obama's Speech:My comments Time to be Religious and not Political, Ben Shaprio: For Obama, Leftist Rhetoric Is Always Innocent and Conservatives Are Always Guilty. Daniel Greenfield: Exploiting Dead Cops to Promote Their Killers.

bs"d

Obama's speech is another example of distorting, censoring and hijacking truth for public consumption.  

When the President of the United States does it, it becomes the modus operandi.  

• Mainstream media become puppets that controls the narrative by subtly censoring and/or neutralizing any pro Israel or Conservative perspective.  
  

• Major and smaller religious organizations dependent on the Obama Administration funding are afraid to speak publicly against these subtle false narratives, and will neutralize opposition and may even engage in support of the narrative.   They are fearful of losing their IRS status, accused of being political, and therefore ineligible for nonforprofit status. They probably fear for funding. They might fear losing their political position. 

This is a way to neutralize the opposition since when the mainstream leadership is silent, so are the masses.  

This is especially dangerous to Israel, and the world by extension, as the distortions, censoring and hijacking of truth revolve around putting radical Islam in the best positive light and by extension,  Israel in a negative light.  

As we are currently witnessing, terror against Israel is merely a harbinger of terror elsewhere. 

Again, religious organizations are afraid to express religious truths since such  expression is then labeled as political.  

How to Counter this phenomenon?

Each one of us as individuals, (while most of my readers are Jewish, this is meant for all Noahides),  must use all our tools at our disposal to put a pro G-d, Pro Israel, Pro Life narrative.  

We have social media which can help. Also, be proactive to speak in your Shuls/Synagogues,  Houses of Worship and Religious and or Conservative affiliations etc and advocate that the Laws of Universal Morality apply to Islam just as it does to all religions.  

 Sharia and Jihad is dangerous to society and must be confronted and treated as the evil it is. 

The Democratic Party has embraced, protected forces that promote Radical Islam.  Iran, Isis, Muslim Brotherhood all whom are in overt violations of Universal Morality.

The Republican Party on the other hand promotes Universal Morality, Judeo Christian values, and  must be commended for speaking out against the "Occupation", a false narrative, and taking a G-dly stand for Israel. 

It is unfortunate that the Netanyahu's administration continues to promote and support the 2 State Solution narrative.  Such a narrative is in direct contradiction of the Biblical one where the Nation of Israel is the rightful inheritors of the Land of Israel.  

A Person of Faith believes that only the Biblical Narrative is the Path to Peace!  The Biblical boundaries of the Land of Israel is clearly delineated in the Bible and Judea and Samaria is clearly the heartland of the Land of Israel. 

The Republican Party has a base whose foundation is strongly based on Faith in G-d and the Bible. This is reflected in their platform.  

To support the wholesome religious platform of the Republicans rather than on a toxic agenda of the Democratic Party which has empowered evil,  and whose policies consistently empowers evil,  is not a political statement.  It is a religious one. 

Frankly, it is apparent that evil has hijacked and kidnapped the Democratic platform infesting the upper echelons and slowly infesting all who are in proximity. 

The entire Nation, including Democrats themselves need to find the inner strength to impeach Obama and bring Hillary to justice under criminal charges. 

We all must answer to a Higher Authority and the Gov't of the USA, One Nation Under G-d,  and the Gov't of Israel must as well. 

 

For Obama, Leftist Rhetoric Is Always Innocent and Conservatives Are Always Guilty
http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/for-obama-leftist-rhetoric-is-always-innocent-and-conservatives-are-always-guilty/2016/07/15/

For Obama, Leftist Rhetoric Is Always Innocent and Conservatives Are Always Guilty

By: Ben Shapiro

Published: July 15th, 2016 
Latest update: July 14th, 2016

U.S. President Barack Obama. 
Photo Credit: screen capture

{Originally posted to The Daily Wire website}

When it comes to the linkage between violence and rhetoric, I abide by a fairly simple rule: If you're not advocating violence, you're not responsible for violence. That doesn't mean your rhetoric is decent or appropriate; it may be vile, awful and factually incorrect. But it isn't the cause for violence.

President Barack Obama also abides by a simple rule when it comes to linking violence and rhetoric: If he doesn't like the rhetoric, it's responsible for violence. And if there's violence associated with rhetoric he likes, then the violence must have been caused by something else.

This shining double standard was on full display this week after an anti-white racist black man shot 12 police officers in Dallas just hours after Obama appeared on national television explaining that alleged instances of police brutality and racism were "not isolated incidents" but rather "symptomatic of a broader set of racial disparities that exist in our criminal justice system." Obama was happy to label the shootings of Alton Sterling in Louisiana and Philando Castile in Minnesota, without evidence, as part of a broader racist trend in law enforcement across the country.

Then Micah Xavier Johnson opened fire on white police officers — and anti-police racist radicals attacked officers in Minnesota, Tennessee, Missouri, Georgia and Texas again — and Obama suddenly got amnesia. Now, it turned out, rhetoric had nothing to do with their actions. In fact, said Obama, he had no idea why Johnson — who explicitly said he wanted to murder white cops — would do such a thing. "I think it's very hard to untangle the motives of this shooter," Obama said while in Poland. "What triggers that, what feeds it, what sets it off — I'll leave that to psychologists and people who study these kinds of incidents." He did blame one element for the attack, however: lack of gun control. "If you care about the safety of our police officers," he lied, "you can't set aside the gun issue and pretend that that's irrelevant."

Odd how this works. When a white racist shoots up a black church in Charleston, South Carolina, Obama targets America's legacy of racism, and the entire media call for a national fight against Confederate flags; when a nut tries to shoot up a Planned Parenthood building in Colorado, the left emerges to claim that the pro-life movement bears culpability. But when an Orlando jihadi shoots up a gay nightclub, Obama and company declare the motives totally mysterious and then impugn Christian social conservatives and the National Rifle Association.

Here's the truth: Obama's rhetoric isn't responsible for murder, but it's certainly responsible for death. That's because Obama's racist rhetoric has led to the greatest rise in racial polarization since the 1970s. In 2010, just 13 percent of Americans worried about race relations, whereas in April 2016, 35 percent of Americans did. That racial polarization has, in turn, led to distrust of police officers, many of whom respond by pulling out of the communities that need their help most. Crime rates go up, including murder rates. Ironically, Obama's supposed rage at white officers killing blacks leads to more blacks killing blacks in cities no longer policed by whites.

But there's good news: Obama can always blame everyone else. When you're held responsible for your feelings rather than your actions, it's always simple to direct attention toward the evil conservatives who insist that all lives matter rather than care enough about black lives to save them by endorsing the police who work to protect black men and women every day.

Ben Shapiro

see also 

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Exploiting Dead Cops to Promote Their Killers

Posted by Daniel Greenfield 0 Comments

In Dallas, Obama mentioned the name of dead sex offender Alton Sterling more times than those of the murdered police officers whom he was pretending to memorialize. After quickly dispensing with the formalities of eulogizing the slain officers, Obama demanded that "even those who dislike the phrase 'black lives matter'" should "be able to hear the pain of Alton Sterling's family".

 Alton Sterling was a convicted sex offender, burglar and violent criminal who was shot while reaching for a gun. His family may mourn him, just as every criminal's family mourns their own, but it was obscene to class him together with five police officers who were murdered by a violent racist while doing their duty.

It is even more obscene when Obama's favorite sex offender displaces the murdered police officers.

And yet that was Obama's theme in Dallas. Murdered police officers were contrasted with dead criminals. The proper thing for Americans to do, as Obama told us, was to mourn both officers and criminals, to respect the sacrifices of the police and the anti-police accusations of #BlackLivesMatter.

Obama did not come to Dallas to mourn the murdered police officers, but to defend the ideology that took their lives. And this is what he has done from the very beginning.

Before the shootings, Obama expressed his "condolences for the families of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile" and insisted that the criminal justice system was racist. His statements and speeches after the shootings echoed the same talking points and spin complete with the claims that accusing the police of racism is "not to be against law enforcement". 

"When people say 'Black Lives Matter,' that doesn't mean blue lives don't matter", he famously said.

That's true. Black Lives Matter doesn't mean that blue lives don't matter. It means that blue lives are evil. As Ta-Nehisi Coates, an author on Obama's reading list, wrote of the dead police officers who gave their lives on September 11, "They were not human to me." That's the kindest thing that the black nationalists whose cause Obama has championed have said of the police.

In a more recent article titled, "The Near Certainty of Anti-Police Violence", the MacArthur Genius Grant recipient and son of a Black Panther suggests that black resentment of police makes their murder predictable. 

"Sanctimonious cries of nonviolence will not help," Coates writes. "The extent to which we are tolerant of the possibility of more Walter Scotts and Freddie Grays is the extent to which we are tolerant of the possibility of more Micah Xavier Johnsons."

It's the core black nationalist message made more palatable for liberal audiences. Underneath the word games, the attempt to treat the ideological justifications for the mass murder of police as inevitable, is the same message delivered by Ismaaiyl Abdullah Brinsley, the #BlackLivesMatter supporter who assassinated two NYPD officers, who had posted, "They take 1 of ours…Let's take 2 of theirs". Obama's message was even more polished than Coates, but not really so very different. Coates had polished up the radical black nationalist message for liberal audiences. Obama's speechwriters shaped his for a national audience. But underneath the religiosity and praise of the police was sheer contempt.

In one of the nastily cynical moments, Obama claimed that "to honor these five outstanding officers who we lost" we would have to act on "uncomfortable" truths such as his claim that the police are racist. "Insisting we do better to root out racial bias is not an attack on cops, but an effort to live up to our highest ideals," he spun. 

While the media applauded his "healing", Obama was just recycling his speeches from before the Dallas shooting. The talking points had not changed. They had only been moved around a little to exploit the police officers murdered by a #BlackLivesMatter supporter in order to promote #BlackLivesMatter.

Indeed this had always been Obama's first and foremost priority.

After the shooting, his initial response was to emphasize that the anti-police protests were "peaceful". At Dallas, in his praise of the police officers, he insisted on inserting that same description of a "peaceful" protest "in response to the killing of Alton Sterling of Baton Rouge and Philando Castile of Minnesota". The choice of words, 'killing' rather than 'death', is significant.

The "shootings in Minnesota and Baton Rouge" were equated with the murders of police officers in Dallas in a breathtaking bit of moral equivalence. Americans were encouraged to grieve for sex offender Alton Sterling and the murdered police officers at the same time. And, just in case there was any ambiguity about which side he was on, Obama warned that "we cannot simply turn away and dismiss those in peaceful protest as troublemakers or paranoid." 

It was a defense of #BlackLivesMatter at a memorial for their victims.

Obama's spin was that he was calling for unity when in reality he was pushing the divisive agenda of the hate group whose rhetoric helped lead to the killings. He was not a healer, but an arsonist. 

There was nothing unifying about his exploitation of a memorial service to push anti-cop messages or to call for gun control. Neither message is in any way, shape or form unifying. They are as divisive as can be.

Obama did not come to Dallas to mourn, to heal or to unify. His sole purpose was to protect his #BlackLivesMatter hate group from the consequences of its rhetoric. Americans were fed lies about peaceful protests featuring armed members of hate groups who had called for the murder of police.

#BlackLivesMatter draws its inspiration from a cop-killer. It has deliberately targeted white people in much the same fashion that Micah X. Johnson did. The only real difference between Johnson and the black nationalist hate groups frantically trying to distance themselves from him in much the same way that mosques do from the latest Islamic terrorist is that he followed through on a lot of their rhetoric.

Johnson was not trying to get a job writing Black Panther comics or making YouTube videos. He actually did the sort of thing that #BlackLivesMatter role models like Assata Shakur did. He killed police officers.

For Obama, Dallas was a bump in the black nationalist road. It was, like every Islamic terrorist attack, an unfortunate incident from which we shouldn't draw any conclusions, except perhaps that guns are bad. The goal is to redirect our attention to the next set of #BlackLivesMatter protests or the next celebrity tweeting about gun control and how mean those men with guns who aren't on their payroll are. 

He did not come to Dallas to praise the dead, but to enlist them in the service of his anti-police agenda.

Not only had Obama's actions led to the murder of police officers, but he was determined to whitewash their deaths and exploit them as weapons in his war against the police.

--

Sincerely,

Robin Ticker

Israel Advocacy Calendar (www.IsraelAdvocacyCalendar.com).

Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan) and Howard Chaim Grief great activists and lovers of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichronum Baruch.  May their memories serve as a blessing. 

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog.