The Duma affair
התנצלו עכשיו!
רותי איזיקוביץ
Apologize NOW! by Ruti Itzkowitz (translated with the help of google translate)
I asked for a soul...
On the 11th of this month (June) [once again changed to the 19th of June, Robin], a judge will hold a preliminary trial - whether to accept the confessions given under torture or not. The very demand of the State Attorney's Office on behalf of the GSS, to accept the "confessions," indicates that in the opinion of every sane person that someone here is not in the best of Mental health
Two and a half ago I asked here for a caring soul, at least one, even on their own to address the horror of torture of ISA thugs who tortured two suspects Jews. Suspected of torching a Dawabsheh village of Duma, one minor was 16. I asked for a caring soul, a soul who can not let itself rest while the tortures were happening. There were none other than the Rabbi, Dr. Eliyahu Zinni, who at the beginning of the Duma affair rebuked Rabbis who wanted to visit the [Palestinian community of the] arson victims and to apologize... to apologize on behalf of whom, when nothing was known about the identity of the arsonists; Except for Rabbi Zinni, there was not one who stopped to ask, What is their name ?! What do you know? When the torture [of the Jewish suspects] became known, Rabbi Eli Sadan offered to "kiss the legs and arms of the GSS."
Until a few days ago, the young men [Duma suspects] were abandoned, and there was none who stood up alongside them, someone like the writer Emil Zola in his fight for justice for the Jew Dreyfus, [other than] Dr. Zinni and women in the United States who have been fighting for them for many months, the Chabad women led by Tamar Adelstein, including Mrs. Robin Ticker and others, and the AFSI organization, headed by Ms. Helen Friedman.
Will a redeemer finally come following these afflictions?
On the 11th [changed to 19th] of this month (June), a judge will hold a preliminary trial - whether to accept the confessions given under torture or not. The very fact that the State Attorney's Office demanded that the GSS accept the "confessions," according to every sane person, indicates that someone here, asking for such demands, is not in a healthy state of mind. Now the demand from the court is to recognize the confessions that were given not under extreme torture, (as if the tortured suspects were in their free hour in the yard, perhaps on their way to a friendly meeting with the police, who came to ask them to sign again, and this time to forget all the torture.)
Turn to all the GSS supporters , including the rabbi who called to kiss the arms and legs of the Shin Bet security, and of the entire list of Ministers, MKs and President and demand that they: "Apologize! Before this verdict, Apologize! Even if (in my opinion, based on very little) the GSS came to you cunningly, in their assessment that you have influence on the public under your authority, dripping lies about evidence, that there was no torture, while in court they indeed admitted that there was torture... and what torture!.... and the claim of the interrogators they they had "kept respect for the tortured detainees".
It's been a long time since, and you're still silent ?! Apologize and demand real investigations. Who lit the arson?
Not just another rigged police investigation that found that another arson was caused by an electric short circuit in a house without electricity ...
I dare say that if the rushed condemnations had not been given by who's who [the Prime Minister, the Defense Minister, the President, many MKs etc.etc.etc.], the State Prosecutor's Office would not be obligated now to "bring charges" pushing for a conviction!
For what is the life of two hilltop boys in front of the prestige of the former? So, Apologize!
Moreover, it is important for the prosecution to make the decision in the preliminary trial. After all, if her claim is not accepted, there will be no more trial and the detainees will be released, as there is no evidence against them other than their "confessions." The villagers' testimonies contradict each other and the indictment is filed against only one of the detainees. [actually the minor confessed but his facts were so off base, that they couldn't use his confession but used some other confession where he confessed he was connected to the arson rather than a perpetrator].
Will you say everything is confidential? At least the contradictions are no longer confidential. There is a contradiction even in a statement to the media by then-defense minister Moshe Ya'alon: "We know who the murderers are in Duma, but we do not disclose who they are, in order not to reveal sources." What reliable source knew that there was more than one murderer, when only one was indicted? Just because they do not want to reveal their sources, will they let some murderer go around freely? ...
Apologize. Apologize so long as the court has still not made its decision, because of you or in spite of you.
No comments:
Post a Comment