Subject: Honenu reports: R. Eliyahu wrote letter to GSS Head
|
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Fwd: Honenu reports: R. Eliyahu wrote letter to GSS Head
Subject: Honenu reports: R. Eliyahu wrote letter to GSS Head
Wednesday, January 09, 2019
J'Accuse Duma 2 in Arutz Sheva. Fool Me Once Shame On You Fool Me Twice Shame on Me. On 'Jewish Terror'
Updated Jan. 10th, 2019
To their credit Arutz7 posted 2 newsworthy articles today that accurately depict the horrendous denial of due process to minors. These minors are either Settler Youth or sympathetic to Settler Youth.
This is the story. Settler youth from a Yeshiva were arrested purely based on heresay with no credible evidence and other youth came to protest their arrest. The protesters were denied basic human rights to protest got beaten and arrested and forced to endure worse conditions detained then even a convicted hardened criminal endures in jail.
Police brutality against protesters of torture
'Girl forced to soil pants, boy beaten. They remained in police station all night,' says attorney.
Mordechai Sones, 10/01/19
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/257428#replies
Here is another report in Arutz7 on further denial of due process for the minors being held under archaic and immoral administrative detention laws.
It's increasingly obvious that Administrative detention laws are in place to suppress political dissent not to find criminals. Child human rights activists where are you????
Why can't Shabak come up with some credible evidence other than forced confessions? What gives Shabak or the Israeli Judicial System the right to pick on random Settler kids, with nothing on them other that they are Jewish Settler Youth, demonize them by labeling them 'Jewish terrorists' to justify this supposed criminal investigation? Any normal kid would feel betrayed by such a government that sanctioned such abuse.
Lawyers of 'Jewish terror' suspects walk out of court in protest
After court bars underage suspects from attending appeal hearing, attorneys walk out of court in protest.
Arutz Sheva Staff, 09/01/19
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/257387#replies
Thank you Arutz7 for reporting on these kids behalf. Hopefully it will generate an outrage that will end the 'legal' police and judicial abuse.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B86sGl9yfinjRnRKOUtvc3VqQmhJOUFQN0NfMnRaeFhjZmZN/view?usp=sharing
Tuesday, January 08, 2019
Fwd:Mike Huckabee newsletter January 8, 2019 Today's Commentary --- How should the President get funds to build the wall? -- Another way to fund the border wall, Chuck Norris-approved! -- True priorities -- Woods destroys their shaky tower -- Ainsworth: The twisted philosophy of "social justice" -- "Net neutrality" one year later -- Fake campaigns --"Tippy-top"--- Evening Edition --
From: Mike Huckabee <newsletter@mikehuckabee.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 8, 2019, 1:21 PM
Subject: Another way to fund the border wall, Chuck Norris-approved!
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>
Newsletter
The message you have just received was delivered by Mike Huckabee and includes advertising powered by PowerInbox. These ads help bring this newsletter to you free of charge.
Today's Commentary --- How should the President get funds to build the wall? -- Another way to fund the border wall, Chuck Norris-approved! -- True priorities -- Woods destroys their shaky tower -- Ainsworth: The twisted philosophy of "social justice" -- "Net neutrality" one year later -- Fake campaigns --"Tippy-top"--- Evening Edition --
--------------------------
READ THIS NEWSLETTER ON MY WEBSITE.
Robin,
If the Democratic Congress refuses to appropriate money for border security that includes a wall, what can Trump do? Alternatives would seem to fall into two areas: 1) declare a national emergency and use the defense budget, and 2) find another source of funding such as confiscated drug money, online donations, etc. Let's look at 1) right now, with a follow-up tomorrow on 2).
There would definitely be a court challenge, because everything Trump tries to do is met with one. Matt Naham at the Law & Crime website has examined the "national emergency" argument after Trump asserted that he has the power to bypass Congress by declaring a national emergency and building a physical barrier along the border. He quotes a constitutional law expert, University of Texas Law Prof. Steve Vladeck, who said there's precedent from one 1950s Supreme Court decision that will cause such an attempt to fail.
 |
| ------------------ |
Another way to fund the border wall, Chuck Norris-approved!
By Mike Huckabee
We talked yesterday about the possibility of President Trump going around Congress to get the money for a border wall by declaring a national emergency and using Defense Department funds to build it. According to experts, he's on solid legal ground if he uses construction funds that haven't already been allocated, though we don't know if there's enough non-appropriated money to pay for the entire project. And he could certainly make the case –- with drug and crime stats alone –- that this is indeed a national emergency, as I expect him to do in his address to the nation from the Oval Office Tuesday evening, the first such address of his presidency.
I like to think he read my newsletter and took my advice to give the address
True priorities
By Mike Huckabee
House Democrats are fast revealing their true priorities, and another one is a bill to require universal background checks for all gun purchases, even those between private individuals. Regardless of what you think of the wisdom or effectiveness of that, it would be a major government expansion into the private exercise of a fundamental right, akin to requiring a government permit to self-publish a book.
The bill will probably never make it past the GOP Senate and would likely be struck down as unconstitutional if it did, although with today's judges, it's best not to tempt fate in that regard. But even though it may be a pointless, doomed and unconstitutional waste of time, it signals liberal virtues, so expect it to pass the House by a solid margin.
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/house-dems-prepare-law-will-devastate-private-gun-sales/
------------------------------
Woods destroys their shaky tower
By Mike Huckabee
Warning: This post refers to the sort of language that would get most children's mouths washed out with soap by their mothers, but a certain new Democratic member of Congress not only uses it against the President in front of crowds, but brags about saying it in front of her young son, too. And the Washington Post tried to defend it. But James Woods destroyed their entire shaky tower of rationalization with just one deadly tweet.
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/james-woods-expertly-uses-washington-posts-anti-trump-tweet/
There are a few things not mentioned in the story about the left's attempt to justify this very public profanity aimed at Trump by saying it's not as bad as him calling some nations "s***hole countries." First of all, unlike her profanity in front of children and crowds, that quote from Trump came from a closed-door meeting that I assume was attended exclusively by adults. Also, it's never been established that he actually said it: the claim that he did came from a Democrat with a history of quoting controversial remarks from closed meetings that other attendees denied were ever said, and some at that meeting claim they never heard Trump say it.
Finally, it's worth noting the phony outrage on the left that greeted the quote from Trump. As this story shows, they hardly have such delicate ears that a profanity will send them to the fainting couches, as long as it comes from someone they support and is aimed at a political opponent. Further, their outrage allegedly stemmed from how horrified they were that Trump would suggest that the nations illegal immigrants were fleeing were in any way inferior to our own. In their eyes, America is responsible for all the evils in the world, and all other cultures are not merely equal to Western culture, but superior to our racist, sexist, colonialist, oppressive ways.
And yet, when Trump tries to use border security or deportation to return them to their wonderful nations of origin, the same critics assail him for having no compassion because he wants to send them back to places where they may die from all the violence, crime, drugs, disease, starvation, oppression…
Gee, sounds pretty awful! What word do you think leftists who wholeheartedly defend profanity would use for a place like that?
-------------
| |
-----------------------
Ainsworth: The twisted philosophy of "social justice"
By Laura Ainsworth
Have you been perplexed and frustrated to no end by Social Justice Warriors who profess to be fighting racism and sexism while seeming to be the most racist and sexist of all? The ones who insist they hear "dog whistles" to which we're not attuned but who don't hear the sirens they themselves are emitting? The ones who point fingers but who simply need to look in the closest mirror to see someone obsessed with race, all the while saying it's impossible for them to be racist? Let me tell you, I'm sick of it, too.
SJWs have redefined racism and sexism so that, under their definition, they can't possibly be accused of it. This view doesn't make sense at all, except to someone whose brain has been marinating in a concept called intersectionality, which is all over college campuses now but has apparently been around for decades in sociology and gender studies departments. The only way SJWs could get well-intentioned people to move towards policies that you or I would call racist or sexist was to redefine the terms. And if you don't get it, you're just proving their point by illustrating how clueless you, as a privileged person, are.
"Net neutrality" one year later
By Mike Huckabee
We recently passed the one-year anniversary of the FCC repealing the Obama-era policy of "net neutrality," which set off a firestorm on the left. It was claimed that without government regulation, the Internet as we knew it was over. Consumers would get the shaft as traffic was slowed, blocked and shifted to the highest bidder. There were protests, lawsuits, and vows that it would be a major Democratic campaign issue. The FCC chairman even had to cancel a public appearance due to death threats (leftists now send death threats as often as Bed, Bath and Beyond sends out discount coupons.)
So it's one year later, and what's happened? Well, the Internet is still here. There was hardly a mention of net neutrality during the election. Average internet speeds are up by a third since last year, 23% more homes have access to fiber net, and 5G Internet is promising speeds up to 100 times faster. The private sector is working fine, and none of the hysterical horror stories came true.
As IBD notes at the link, there is a threat to the free and open Internet, but it isn't from ISPs or Republicans on the FCC or lack of federal regulation. The threats are from big tech companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google, and they're all run by self-proclaimed liberals.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/net-neutrality-ajit-pai-internet/
------------------------------
Fake news
By Mike Huckabee
You heard about the Democratic false-flag misinformation campaign meant to make it look like Russians backed losing Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore? Well, it appears there was another one, designed to make it falsely appear that he backed Prohibition of alcohol sales.
Why do Democrats think they have to pay to create fake social media campaigns to slander Republicans as Russian agents and misrepresent their views? Isn't that what the real news media is for?
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/379050.php
----------------------------
"Tippy-top"
By Mike Huckabee
For those who saw Rep. Ocasio-Cortez on "Sixty Minutes" pushing for a return to 70% tax rates on the "tippy-top" earners (apparently, that's a math term now used in college economics classes), here's a handy primer on how tax codes really work and why punishing tax rates result in less revenue to the government, which Democrats like JFK used to understand.
https://www.thenewneo.com/2019/01/07/raising-the-tax-rate-versus-raising-the-effective-tax-rate/
-----------------------------
Evening Edition - January 7
By Mike Huckabee
A wrap-up of all the news you might have missed yesterday!
Did you miss reading a newsletter recently? Go to our archive here.
| |
This e-mail was sent to faigerayzel@gmail.com
Click here to unsubscribe
Blue Diamond Media
Blue Diamond Media P.O. Box 242058 Little Rock, AR 72223
Phone: 1-800-921-4825
Fax: NA
Fwd: Daniel Greenfield's article: Who's Behind the War on Orthodox Jewish Schools?
From: "Sultan Knish" <noreply+feedproxy@google.com>
Date: Jan 8, 2019 8:16 AM
Subject: Daniel Greenfield's article: Who's Behind the War on Orthodox Jewish Schools?
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>
Cc:
Daniel Greenfield's article: Who's Behind the War on Orthodox Jewish Schools?
Romney won over 90% of the vote in some Orthodox Jewish areas.
Traditional religious beliefs are associated with conservative politics among Jews the same way that they are among Christians. 60% of Jews who attended weekly religious services disapproved of Obama while those who didn't, mostly supported him. Why do American Jews lean much more to the left? Because only 11% of American Jews attend weekly synagogue services. Well below the 40% national average.
Only 34% of American Jews are certain that they believe in G-d. What do they believe in? When asked what it means to be Jewish, 56% mentioned social justice, 42% comedy and only 19% percent mentioned anything involving religion. Meanwhile 63% of Israeli Jews believe "completely" in G-d.
Last year, Trump's approval rating among Orthodox Jews was at 71%. The American Jewish Committee's Survey wrote the results up glumly as "We have seen the future, and it looks Orthodox".
Establishment Jewish groups, which suddenly woke up and realized that the majority of Jewish children in New York City were Orthodox Jews, are preparing to fight that future. If those children are allowed to grow up Orthodox, the end of the Jewish Left will have arrived. And so they came after the children.
The New York State Department of Education now threatens to shut down Jewish schools and report parents who refuse to send their children to leftist government schools to child protection authorities. As in the Soviet Union, giving a child a Jewish education would be treated as evidence of child abuse. The government would be able to abduct children for the crime of receiving a Jewish education.
The new "Indian Residential Schools" had arrived.
Jewish schools aren't the only targets of this discriminatory campaign by the educational establishment. Catholic schools have also come under attack with the Archdiocese of New York posting an editorial that declares, "Leviathan has now focused its attention on religious schools here in New York, with the clear intention of either forcing them to submit to its authority or face destruction."
The public face of the campaign against Jewish schools is YAFFED or Young Advocates for Fair Education. Its members claim to be the products of Orthodox Jewish schools whose poor education left them so unprepared for the real world that all they were able to do was launch an extremely effective statewide campaign whose press releases and talking points are quoted verbatim in every single media outlet.
As in March for Our Lives, young faces are used to hide the agendas of the old lefties behind the curtain.
While Naftuli Moster, YAFFED's executive director, plays its equivalent of David Hogg, speaking to media outlets and appearing at forums to discuss the incredible intellectual disadvantage that the same educational system that produced generations of visionary thinkers and geniuses burdened him with, Hannah Rothstein, a not remotely "young" Baruch College prof, serves as its president.
Hannah Rothstein also serves on the board of Footsteps, an organization working to secularize Orthodox Jews and transition them to an irreligious lifestyle. She's a Trump critic and an Obama supporter.
She has also donated to Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Al Franken, Beto O'Rourke and Cory Booker. Her repeated out of state donations, some through ActBlue, show a woman passionate about the Left. And the growing Orthodox Jewish population poses a threat to everything that Rothstein has been funding.
Moster, YAFFED's public face, is also a Footsteps graduate. Pesach Eisen, a Yaffed member who testified in its cause, is a Footsteps member and a fellow with the radical leftist Jews for Racial & Economic Justice which denies the existence of lefty anti-Semitism even as it defends leftist anti-Semites. Eisen demonstrates how Footsteps and YAFFED act as arms of the broader anti-Jewish Left.
And Moster has, in turn, defended the anti-Semitic Women's March.
Anita Altman serves on the Board of Directors of YAFFED and her bio boasts of helping numerous Footsteps clients. In 2014, she had signed an angry letter, declaring, "AIPAC speaks for Israel's hard-line government and its right-wing supporters, and for them alone; it does not speak for us." The signatories included a range of anti-Israel activists, supporters of BDS and defenders of anti-Semitic terrorism.
Altman has also signed a letter backing anti-Semitic Farrakhan supporter Linda Sarsour.
Altman is, unsurprisingly, no fan of religious Jews. In a bizarre interview, which repeatedly warns of a "khasidic takeover", she complained that there is "fear" when "it comes to government dealing with these fundamentalist communities." Then she compared Orthodox Jews to Iran.
That's the medieval bigotry behind YAFFED and the war on Orthodox Jewish schools.
YAFFED's bid is all about lefties using the government to deal with "fundamentalists" under the guise of helping the few formerly Orthodox members of Footsteps being used as fronts for the hateful operation.
Altman isn't the only anti-Israel activist in YAFFED. Its communications director, Abigail Beatty, also allegedly works for the anti-Israel NIF, an organization notorious for its funding of leftist and BDS group.
YAFFED claims to advocate for "the rights of Hasidic and ultra-Orthodox children". But it appears to be another face of Footsteps: an organization advocating against the traditional religious practices of Orthodox Judaism.
The people behind YAFFED have the right to advocate for discriminatory policies targeting the Orthodox Jewish community, in order to force Jewish parents to take their children out of Jewish schools.
They have the right to do so in the name of their radical leftist politics and hatred of religion.
But they have no right to masquerade as an organization fighting for the rights of the very people they are persecuting. Instead of highlighting these obvious connections, the media has chosen to act as the echo chamber for YAFFED while denying the Jewish communities targeted by Altman and her ilk, a voice.
Anonymous stories and bots have been used to manufacture a group of Orthodox Jewish parents and children who are "suffering" in the Jewish school system, but oddly, choose not to leave it.
These astroturf tactics are being used to justify discrimination and harassment of a religious community.
It's about more than just the bigotry of Anita Altman, obsessed with recreating Philip Roth's Eli the Fanatic. Behind the fresh young faces, there are elderly veterans of the lefty political establishment, many with backgrounds in education and academia, who see religious Jewish education as a threat.
An economic threat and also a political threat.
In a letter to a Democrat councilmember, David Bloomfield, claimed that the war on Jewish schools would enable their students to "vote outside the confines of their deterministic communities".
Bloomfield has written a number of articles and appeared at Yaffed forums attempting to pressure the government into cracking down on Jewish schools.
At stake are two very different visions of education and the future.
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos recently visited Orthodox Jewish schools and touted them as models of school choice. There is no word in the English language that the Left hates more than "choice".
The education lobby has gone to war against charter schools. And Orthodox Jewish schools are seen as even worse than charter schools. They don't bow to the teachers' unions. The money their parents spend on education doesn't end up in the pockets of union bosses and their Democrat political allies.
The Orthodox Jewish community has helped drive the expansion of voucher programs. And school choice is an existential threat to the educational establishment and the political power of the Left.
Orthodox Jewish communities have fueled support for school choice not only in New York, but in swing states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida, endangering presidential elections.
Something had to be done about those pesky Jews. Now something is being done.
The Left's vision of the educational system is Footsteps and Yaffed writ large, a machine for destroying communities, undermining their traditions, and crushing parental authority so that academics can reinvent the children in their own cultural and political image. That's what happened to American Jews.
Now the same people who a century ago turned a generation of immigrants from believers in G-d to believers in social justice see another Jewish demographic threat and want to do it all over again.
On Sabbath, hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews will read the story of how an ancient Egyptian leader grew disgusted with rising Jewish demographics. "Behold, the numbers of the children of Israel are too many," he tells his political allies. "Come, let us deal cunningly with them, lest they multiply."
On Fifth Avenue, the establishment pharaohs, whose faith is not in Isis or Hathor, but in progressive social justice, look at the children in Jewish schools across New York City and bitterly echo his words.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine at the above link.
Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation.
Thank you for reading.
You are subscribed to email updates from Sultan Knish .
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.Email delivery powered by Google Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States
