Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Vehi SheAmda. Our Response? Return and Renew Our Covenant with Hashem! msg from Chief Rabbi of South Africa. Cry Out and Expose Obama .....and Jewish Leaders who assist him

 
bs"d
  
Dear Chavrei Knesset, Rabbanim and Print Media,

 
Vehi SheAmda.... Yaakov Shweky.... Message of the Chief Rabbi of South Africa,
http://www.youtube.com/embed/0eVMfNQskWc?rel
 
Translated: And it is this [covenant] that has stood for our Forefathers and us. For not just one enemy stands (present tense, changed from Haggadah text 'stood', past tense) against us to wipe us out. But in every generation there have been those who have stood against us to wipe us out, and the Holy One Blessed Be He saves us from their hands.
 
 
Obama is empowering evil http://www.arlenefromisrael.info/reports
Patronizing the Palestinians http://www.youtube.com/embed/TzCIckbZKUs?feature=player_embedded and Israel has been afraid to take a stand against Obama and his reelection and Obama's anti Israel nominations out of fear of "interfering" with America's election process?  I fear much worse things.   Hagel, Brennan and Kerry all support and empower Israel's enemies who publicly call out for Israel's destruction".  How can we be silent and foolish to allow Obama to drill a hole in "his" cabin on our ship?
 
So in order that we learn the correct way to stand resolutely with uprightness and justifiably "interfere", Obama shows us the way. He tells us that Israel is working against her own interest towards her own destruction which is of course the exact opposite if we listen to him 
 
Yes! Let's  finally begin to interfere with America's elected officials and work to impeach this Obama, a Nazi empowerer  and American imposter (and I don't use these words lightly) (His empowerment of Edrogen, Ahmadinahjad, Afghan rebel terrorists that support al Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood Morsi who says Jews come from Apes and pigs and the infiltration of radical Islam and Muslim Brotherhood in his administration in our midst and his zealousness for gun control is sufficient proof for these serious allegations! and if you still need further proof check out  Metamorphosis (1 picture = 1000 words)http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2013/01/fwd-metamorphosis-1-picture-1000-words.html
 
 It is our lives, Israel, America etc. at stake!.....We can not be SILENT!
 
  • Netanyahu was quiet and did not express opposition to the reelection of Obama nor endorse Republican candidate ) (didn't want to interfere in American elections) and is silent about Obama's choice of nominations: Hagel, Kerry and Brennan (does not want to interfere with American politics),
    • Feiglin is quiet about Obama and demolition of Settlement Outposts under Netanyahu yet talks of Jewish values and faith but not Torah. (Hopefully next time, Moshe Feiglin will get his own bullet with a bigger font when he is not a subordinate)
  • Aipac is quiet http://pjmedia.com/blog/speaking-volumes-aipac-silent-on-chuck-hagel/ and even
  • Naftali Bennett is quiet about Obama nominations of Hagel, Kerry and Brennan though he is quite vocal against taking aid from America.  He is quiet about Israel's Covenant and is unwilling to annex all of Judea and Samaria.  If we speak about our Covenant, we can not annull even a small part of G-d's Torah. Even the Jordan is Palestine paradigm solution is not a solution nor consistent with Torah since the East Bank of the River Jordan is not supposed to be an Islamic terror state.   It is supposed to be the inheritance of Reuvein Gad and part of Shevet Menasheh.  If the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is replaced with a terror Palestinian State, Israel's borders are seriously in danger.
 
Our response must be to Return to and Renew out Covenant "Zocher Habrit" and unite the right parties and speak out strongly for G-d's Covenent with Israel to inherit the Land and settle the Land including all of Judea and Samaria and against OBAMA and his policies and nominations.  How dare we allow him to defy's G-d's will and the Torah!!! We have no other option but to defy his arrogance.
 
If Aipac, Israel's lobby is quiet about anti Israel nominations how can we expect our Senators to be more pro Israel than Israel itself? In this case the silence of Aipac seriously weakens support for Israel in Congress. Is it no surprise that Schumer a Jew, endorses Hagel?
Obama now has a perfect Jewish scapegoat, Lew,  when the economy goes from bad to worse he can always blame it on the Jew and an Orthodox one, noch besser.
 
 
How did Hitler succeed in rounding up the Jews without serious protest?  He enlisted the Jews to help him.  Ideally, a local Judenrat was to include Rabbis and other influential people of their local Jewish community. Thus, enforcement of laws could be better facilitated by the German authorities by using established Jewish authority figures and personages, while undermining external influences. For example in Salonika in Turkey the deportations were organized with the assistance of the Jedenrat or Jewish Council headed by Chief Rabbi Zvi Koretz, who appointed the president of the council in December.  1942. In occupied Europe, the Nazis entrusted Jewish officials with the task of making such lists of Jews along with information about the property they owned. The Judenräte also directed the Jewish police to assist the Germans in catching Jews and loading them onto transport trains leaving for concentration camps. In her book, Arendt wrote that: "To a Jew this role of the Jewish leaders in the destruction of their own people is undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the whole dark
 

 

 

 
 
 
--
Sincerely,
 
Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.
 
Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 
 
 
Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 
Posted by at No comments:

Fwd: Metamorphosis (1 picture = 1000 words)

 

 

 

Metamorphosis (1 picture = 1000 words)

Make you think!

 

Makes you think!

 IRAN 1970
 
 
 
 
 
 
 IRAN 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 AFGHANISTAN
 
 
 
 
 
 
 EGYPT (Cairo University)  1959
 
 
 
 
 
 
 EGYPT (Cairo University)  2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam)  1980
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam)  2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ... and some people still do not see a reason  to worry ?!?!?
 
 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 



-
 
    


 "A smile is a curve that sets everything straight."
 חיוך הוא עקומה שמגדירה כל ישר

   


 
 



--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 
Posted by at No comments:

From Israel: "Speechless" Arlene Kushner Jan 15, 2013


bs"d
 
January 15, 2012
 
"Speechless"
 
It isn't often that I am rendered  speechless, and even when that happens, I am likely to recover my words in short order.
 
Although, when I write that I'm speechless now, I do not mean it literally: It's rhetorical.  More that I cannot quite wrap my head around what I know -- which comes at me, day by day, with ever greater clarity and certainty.  For it is both incredible and terrifying.  And so I search for the words that will bring the message home.
 
I am referring, my friends, to is the situation in the US and the ramifications of that situation.  
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Please, pay careful attention to what Frank Gaffney Jr, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, has just written (all emphasis added):

"Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly declared that 'a world without America is not only desirable, it is achievable.'  While that sentiment won't be embraced in President Obama's inaugural address next week, all other things being equal, it seems likely to be the practical effect of his second term.

"Of course, Iran's regime seeks a world literally without America... . 

"For his part, Barack Obama seems to have in mind bringing about a world without America in a geo-strategic sense." 

Gaffney then quotes political analyst Mark Steyn, who refers to a "fundamental transformation" of America's place in the world, evidently intended, says Gaffney, "to be the President's second-act..." after a first act that focused on the domestic. 

"That agenda is strongly evident in Mr. Obama's choices for key national security cabinet positions: John Kerry at the State Department, Chuck Hagel at Defense and John Brennan at the CIA.  The three are, like the President, imbued with a post-American, post-sovereignty, post-constitutional, transnationalist outlook.  In his administration, it would appear that their mission would be, as the American Enterprise Institute's Danielle Pletka puts it, to manage the United States' decline.

"Having addressed previously in this space the serious problems with the judgment, records and policy proclivities of Messrs. Hagel (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/17/hagel-a-dangerous-choice-for-defense/) and Kerry (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/2/hold-kerry-accountable-senate-should-not-gloss-ove/), let's consider those of John Brennan to further illustrate the syndrome.

Brennan is a textbook example of a U.S. official who has 'gone native.'  He speaks Arabic and was formerly the top CIA officer in Saudi Arabia.  He has shown himself to be deeply sympathetic to Islamists -- for example, excusing and dissembling about their commitment to jihad and the necessity of not offending them.

"After President Obama himself, John Brennan is, arguably, the single most important enabler of the Islamic supremacists' agenda in government today. In his role as Homeland Security Advisor to the President... Brennan has helped legitimate, empower, fund, arm and embolden them abroad, and embraced and appeased them here at home.

"Of particular concern is the fact that John Brennan has presided over: the policy of engaging the Muslim Brotherhood, which has consequently been portrayed by a politicized intelligence community as 'largely secular' and 'eschewing violence'; the shredding of training briefings and the proscribing of trainers that might upset Muslims by telling the truth about shariah and the jihad it commands; the penetration of U.S. agencies by Muslim Brotherhood-associated individuals as employees and/or senior advisors; and misrepresentations to Congress about the true, jihadist character of the attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi last September 11th.

"Of particular concern is the prospect that Team Obama's second-term team will, if confirmed, be even more insistent than their predecessors on engaging Iran.  Make no mistake about it:  The practical effect will be to buy the regime in Tehran the last few months it evidently needs to achieve what it has sought for decades: the means to have the world not only bereft of America's leadership and stabilizing force, but to neutralize and perhaps eliminate the United States as a 21st Century society."

http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p19181.xml

~~~~~~~~~~

If this does not make your blood run cold, or make it difficult for you to catch your breath, you're not getting it.  Frank Gaffney is a very reputable and knowledgeable commentator and he knows full well whereof he speaks.  Dismiss this at your own peril, and the peril of the US.
 
And that leads me to the second reason that I am (rhetorically) speechless: Most Americans don't get it.  I know this because they voted for Obama a second time in spite of the evidence: Much was written well before the election about such alarming situations as the infiltration into the government of Muslim-brotherhood associated individuals.  But very few were listening. 
 
And I know because the American people are not marching in the streets by the millions.
 
There is a shrugging, and a turning of the head.  There are pathetic comments like, "I may not agree with Hagel but the president needs to nominate someone he's comfortable with."  (This from Congressman Peter King.)  There is a reluctance to take on a battle that might sour the relationship with the president.  (This from American Jewish leadership, which is comprised in the main of court Jews.)
 
In the end, only Americans can save America, and I am not at all convinced that it is going to happen.
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Gaffney further says:

"The Senate's constitutional responsibility to confirm senior executive branch appointees is one of the few it hasn't compromised, or allowed the president to expropriate.  It must exercise its authority to assure "quality control" with respect to his picks for top national security cabinet posts.

"Indeed, the fact that President Obama seeks not one or two, but three individuals who share his determination to achieve the radical and dangerous national security transformation he seeks in his second term demands that Senators defy him.  After all, should the Senate fail to object to this trajectory by rigorously debating and defeating any -- and preferably all -- of these problematic choices, its members risk not only allowing, but becoming party to, the realization of a world without America."

Don't let your Senators off the hook.  Let them know hear from you on this:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

And share this posting, share it, share it!

~~~~~~~~~~
What further renders me speechless (and for all my very deep love and concern for America, this is perhaps the worst) are the implications that must be faced within the Western democratic world of what it means that America is imploding.  The agenda of Iran and Islamists more broadly is being advanced, and the security of those democracies is being rendered more vulnerable.
 
A 154-page report authored by five non-proliferation experts in the US-- "US Nonproliferation Strategy for the Changing Middle East" -- is about to be released. It says that Iran may produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one or more nuclear bombs by mid-2014.  And it recommends that the US and its allies should intensify sanctions on Tehran before that point is reached. It further recommends that:
 
"The president should explicitly declare that he will use military force to destroy Iran's nuclear program if Iran takes additional decisive steps toward producing a bomb." 
 
 
But Obama has nominated as Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, a man who not only does not believe in military action against Iran, he does not support sanctions and favors instead "negotiations."
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Obama has made statements innumerable times about the fact that he would not let Iran reach nuclear capability. This was usually in the context of making sure Israel didn't attack Iran -- as in, "trust me to take care of it."   Who could believe this now?  Who can trust Obama?
 
Of course, he also said he has Israel's back.  Lots of Jews loved that, which was his goal, of course. Is there a single Jew now who would be willing to come to Jerusalem and look me in the eye and tell me that he or she truly believes Obama has our back??
 
But apparently, this duplicity is not considered sufficiently important to merit raising of voices -- or marching in the streets.
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
PM Netanyahu says that in his next term he is going to focus on Iran.  I take issue with him on some things, but here he is spot-on.  Brave, in my book, and determined. And the only leader in the world with his eyes open, it seems. 
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Obama has moved past re-election mode and is now into "legacy" mode, which means he worries about achieving successes that he can be remembered for.  Irrationally, he still apparently thinks achieving some sort of successful Israeli-Palestinian Arab negotiations may be possible.  And to that end, he's been complaining about Netanyahu's readiness to build in Jewish communities (otherwise referred to as "settlements") in Judea and Samaria: he actually has the unmitigated gall to say that "Israel doesn't know its own best interests." 
 
 
Considering that he's bringing his own country down, I guess this, too, leaves me speechless.
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
For the record, ISRAEL -- a sovereign state with a democratically elected government -- will decide what is in Israel's best interests.
 
And this is what our prime minister says (emphasis added:

"In the Middle East, the real Middle East, any territory that we evacuate will be captured by Iran. The stronger we are, the more we will be able to guarantee our future and make peace with our neighbors."

 
Amen to this!
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
© Arlene Kushner. This material is produced by Arlene Kushner, functioning as an independent journalist. Permission is granted for it to be reproduced only with proper attribution. 
 
If it is reproduced and emphasis is added, the fact that it has been added must be noted.
 
See my website at www.arlenefromisrael.info  Contact Arlene at akushner18@gmail.com
 
This material is transmitted by Arlene only to persons who have requested it or agreed to receive it. If you are on the list and wish to be removed, contact Arlene and include your name in the text of the message.   
 



--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 
Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Obama: Some Gun Control Measures I Can Accomplish Through Executive Action. Second Amendment - the right to bear arms

Obama: Some Gun Control Measures 'I Can Accomplish Through Executive Action...', Video, You Tube
From: Paul Eidelberg <foundation612.12@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:24:33 +0200
To: Paul Eidelberg<paul@i-ari.org>
Subject: Second Amendment

The Second Amendment

Extracts from Wikipedia

A foundation of American political thought during the Revolutionary period was the well justified concern about political corruption and governmental tyranny. Even the federalists, fending off their opponents who accused them of creating an oppressive regime, were careful to acknowledge the risks of tyranny. Against that backdrop, the framers saw the personal right to bear arms as a potential check against tyranny. Theodore Sedgwick of Massachusetts expressed this sentiment by declaring that it is "a chimerical idea to suppose that a country like this could ever be enslaved . . . Is it possible . . . that an army could be raised for the purpose of enslaving themselves or their brethren? or, if raised whether they could subdue a nation of freemen, who know how to prize liberty and who have arms in their hands?" Noah Webster similarly argued:

Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States.

George Mason argued the importance of the militia and right to bear arms by reminding his compatriots of England's efforts "to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them . . . by totally disusing and neglecting the militia." He also clarified that under prevailing practice the militia included all people, rich and poor. "Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." Because all were members of the militia, all enjoyed the right to individually bear arms to serve therein.

The framers thought the personal right to bear arms to be a paramount right by which other rights could be protected. Therefore, writing after the ratification of the Constitution, but before the election of the first Congress, James Monroe included "the right to keep and bear arms" in a list of basic "human rights", which he proposed to be added to the Constitution.

Patrick Henry, in the Virginia ratification convention June 5, 1788, argued for the dual rights to arms and resistance to oppression:

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

While both Monroe and Adams supported ratification of the Constitution, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, he confidently contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he contemptuously described as "afraid to trust the people with arms." He assured his fellow citizens that they need never fear their government because of "the advantage of being armed...."

By January of 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several specific amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to amendments to assure ratification. Samuel Adams proposed that the Constitution:

Be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms.
Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, January 08, 2013

Also Ask Lawmakers in Congress to oppose confirming Brennan as CIA Director, dangerous to America and Israel like Kerry and Hagel - Obama's choices....

bs"d
 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)