Sunday, August 23, 2009

Fwd: Stop the Presses: Blood Libel Goes Mainstream By Barry Rubin

bs"d

Blood libels are our worst nightmare especially in mainstream press. 

The News creates the News.  Also very dangerous is our own Jewish Media Headlines sanitizing  a Palestinian State and reporting widespread approval polls of Obama and his policies instead of emphasizing critics of Obama and of the 2 State Solution and  Netanyahu's statements.  Why do we need to have Huckabee, a non Jew but a Lover of Israel,  to get our message straight?  Why pay and use non Kosher news sources rather than  Kosher news sources reporting the same event.  Why print posts about Mary Robinson from JTA and not Arutz7? Why describe polls putting Obama in the best light 92% approval among Americans on the front page as did the Jewish Press and then blast him in your editorial pages later on.  It confuses the reader.    Why not use Arutz7 as a news source for polls in Israel and put articles to strengthen our position on the front page like the the  Five Towns Jewish Times.

Publishers and Journalists have a tremendous responsibility and the bottom line ($), trying to impress more readers or advertisers or trying to impress a Rabbinic Leadership that is sleeping should not determine what you print! We are on the verge of a nuclear disaster Chas Veshalom. Caroline Glick is definitely newsworthy.  Why don't I see more of her in your papers.  Not everyone reads the Jerusalem Post.
The news influences peoples mindset big time to the point of brainwashing.  This in turn changes facts on the ground to benefit our enemies.

For Kosher News Sources: :.http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2009/08/fwd-hamodia-kosher-and-treif-press.html



Stop the Presses: Blood Libel Goes Mainstream:
Swedish Newspaper Proves Antisemitism Is Anti-Zionism Is Now Acceptable
By Barry Rubin
August 19, 2009

We are not talking about a Saudi newspaper or Hamas radio station but a Swedish newspaper. We are not talking about a neo-Nazi rag but a daily closely tied to the Swedish Social Democratic Party. And we are not just talking about an obscure item but an article that received top billing.

On August 18, Aftonbladet, Sweden's largest newspaper which claims 1.5 million readers, published an article by a man named Donald Bostrom. The editor responsible is named Asa Linderborg. She is the newspaper's cultural affairs' editor.

This was no random decision for her. When asked once: "What do you wish for most in life right now?" She answered: "What a simple question. What I want is a free Palestine."

And what did this article say? That Israel's army deliberately kidnaps Palestinian civilians and then murders them so it can cut out and sell their organs to sick people needing transplants.

The story is based on the arrest of a Jewish man in Brooklyn for selling organs but the news coverage has no hint of any Israeli connection.

The Swedish story is based on Palestinian sources (though the author also claims he has UN sources for it)--like so many slanders of Israel which are widely purveyed. It is easy to forget that the false claim of a Jenin massacre--which received massive coverage in the Western media--was based on an interview with a single Palestinian who nobody even knew.

Palestinians simply told him that the bodies of terrorists or others killed came back with organs missing. Any photos, medical records, documented complaints? Of course not.

[Ironically, the Beirut Daily Star has a very responsible article, with no claim of Israeli involvement, on the issue of organ sales.]

At this point you are no doubt thinking: This is some kind of sick joke.

Yes, it is. But the newspaper published it any way.

Apparently, the author is a left-wing activist for Palestinian causes, though the newspaper calls him a journalist.

[By the way, this is not the first time such accusations have been made. In the Turkish film, "Valley of the Wolves," Gary Busey played an American Jewish doctor who was stealing the organs of Iraqis for the United States and Israel. Note that the Turkish prime minister praised the film, that it was shown to large Muslim audiences in Holland and elsewhere in Europe, and that a friend who saw it in Syria noticed people crying in the theatre at the sight of such evil behavior. Have no doubt: many thousands of people who saw the film believe this accusation to be true.]

To show how typical this is, Radio Sweden has just broadcast once again the claim that Israel murdered Muhammad Dura, a little boy who may or may not have been killed in the Gaza Strip by Israeli or Fatah bullets. The only proof of these claims was a very suspicious video (other parts of which show Palestinians rehearsing for the show) which a French court has determined to be a fraud. That court decision went unmentioned by Swedish radio.

As Ralph Haglund points out, a Swedish radio Middle East correspondent said he is always ready to take the word of Hamas over that of Israel.

And just to "balance things out," Sweden, at the moment EU president is sending its ambassador to Iran to grace next month's inauguration of recently "reelected" President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whose ideas are starting to seem triumphant in key sections of the European mass media. This is at the very moment when Stalinist-style show trials of opposition leaders are being held by his regime.

To paraphrase Shakespeare, Something is rotten in the state of Sweden.

Will Swedish politicians, intellectuals, and others rise up, pronounce this defamatory article and other things going on in that country to be a national disgrace, and demonstrate? Will the editor be fired? Will there be serious reconsideration of how the hatred of Israel which has so obsessed this supposedly enlightened country has gone over the edge? Will this irrational hatred be re-examined and repudiated? Will the forgotten lessons of how such attitudes produced the Holocaust be learned once again?

I wish so but I don't believe there will be a powerful reaction.

At least, though, the competing newspaper, Svenska Dagbladet, has blasted the article which it says is an antisemitic blood libel without a shred of evidence. For other brave people who are objecting in Sweden--albeit there are very few of them--go here.

.What does this incident tell us? One thing is that there is no limit to the insanity of how Israel is treated nowadays in so many supposedly responsible, left-wing, and intellectual circles.

It also tells us that anyone of decency and good intentions should start re-examining right now their credulity in accepting anti-Israel slanders, nonsensical media or academic claims, or irresponsibly inaccurate "human rights" group reports.

It also tells us that Jews who criticize Israel based on what they are being taught at universities and what they see in the media need to think about what they are doing. And, yes, all this bashing and chipping away at Israel's reputation; this unfair blaming; this blindness toward the goals, behavior, and ideology of radical Islamist forces and Palestinian intransigence is promoting an antisemitism beyond anything seen in the Western world since 1945.

The time has come to realize that antisemitism, anti-Zionism, absurd misrepresentation of Israel and the effort to wipe it off the map are all tightly intertwined.

We have seen the rise of a systematic industry in wild anti-Israel claims by Palestinians which are repeated without evidence by the Western news media and others.

Yet this type of story about ghoulish Israeli monsters is actually rather typical nowadays. The basic methodology in the Swedish case is like that of dozens of others, only in this case the specific accusation was too lurid to win wide acceptance in the West (though not in much of the Arabic-speaking and Muslim majority world).

The recipe is simple: Palestinians make up charges, tell them to sympathetic reporters or academics or "human rights'" officials who don't demand evidence, and then are widely spread through other willing executioners of truth whose low degree of professionalism and high level of politicization make them conducive to becoming collaborators in the enterprise.

Before Israeli officials can investigate and present a detailed response--largely ignored by the media--they are all off to the next lurid accusation.

The fact that none of these accusations is ever ultimately proven correct seems to have no effect on the industry.

In a variation of this theme, a few days ago, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly denounced, as if it was some sort of ethnic cleansing, the eviction of two Palestinian families from an apartment building in Jerusalem. Apparently, Palestinians had presented it as such to U.S. diplomats in Jerusalem.

In fact, as the public record clearly showed, this was merely the result of an Israeli court decision following a long, detailed case lasting years, for non-payment of rent. Palestinian families who paid rent in the building had no problem at all.

The British newspaper of intellectuals and beautiful people, the Guardian, carries an article which uses this incident, among other things, to claim that Israel is a Nazi country. That's two families evicted for non-payment of rent, not quite equivalent to seizing Austria and Czechoslovakia, invading all of Europe, and murdering 12 million or so Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, Poles, Russians, etc., etc.

In fact, when the Iraqi government of Saddam Hussein murdered tens of thousands of Kurdish citizens in the 1990s or when the Syrian regime murdered 10,000 to 15,000 of its own citizens in Hamas in 1982, there was no outrage at all in the West. There still isn't today.

In his Cairo speech, President Barack Obama urged Arabs and Muslims to reject antisemitism. Guess he needs to make that speech to Europeans now.

After all, the hysterical misrepresentation of Israel increasingly seems to parallel the tales of well-poisonings, ritual murders, and Zionist conspiracies to seize world power of past eras.

Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition) and The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley). To read and subscribe to MERIA, GLORIA articles, or to order books, go to http://www.gloria-center.org. To see or subscribe to his blog, http://www.rubinreports.blogspot.com/.

http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2009/08/stop-presses-blood-libel-goes.html


=============================================
Women For Israel's Tomorrow  (Women in Green)
POB 7352, Jerusalem 91072, Israel
Tel: 972-2-624-9887 Fax: 972-2-624-5380
mailto:wfit2@womeningreen.org
http://www.womeningreen.org

To subscribe to the Women in Green list,
please send a blank email message to:
list4-subscribe@womeningreen.org
Check your spam filter for confirmation to reply to

To unsubscribe from the Women in Green list,
please send a blank email message to:
list4-unsubscribe@womeningreen.org

Fwd: FColumn One: Netanyahu's perilous statecraft by Caroline Glick

bs"d

Brilliantly written as usual.  I just disagree with Caroline that we must stick with Netanyahu.  Netanyahu has betrayed too often and has caved in under pressure. Our only option is emphasizing our Biblical entitlement and that this is G-d's Land and we are not entitled to give it away. 

Mordechai from the Purim story shows an example of leadership. Mordechai did not bow down or prostrate himself even at the risk to his life and the life of his fellow Jew.

 

Column One: Netanyahu's perilous statecraft

Aug. 20, 2009
Caroline Glick , THE JERUSALEM POST

This week we discovered that we have been deceived. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's principled rejection of US President Barack Obama's bigoted demand that Israel bar Jews from building new homes and expanding existing ones in Judea and Samaria does not reflect his actual policy.

Construction and Housing Minister Ariel Attias let the cat out of the bag.

Attias said that the government has been barring Jews from building in the areas since it took office four months ago, in the hopes that by preemptively capitulating to US demands, the US will treat Israel better.

And that's not all. Today Netanyahu is reportedly working in earnest to reach a deal with the Obama administration that would formalize the government's effective construction ban through 2010. Netanyahu is set to finalize such a deal at his meeting with Obama's Middle East envoy George Mitchell in London on Wednesday.

Unfortunately, far from treating Israel better as a result of Netanyahu's willingness to capitulate on the fundamental right of Jews to live and build homes in the land of Israel, the Obama administration is planning to pocket Israel's concession and then up the ante. Administration officials have stated that their next move will be to set a date for a new international Middle East peace conference that Obama will chair. There, Israel will be isolated and relentlessly attacked as the US, the Arabs, the Europeans, the UN and the Russians all gang up on our representatives and demand that Israel accept the so-called "Arab peace plan."

That deceptively named plan, which Obama has all but adopted as his own, involves Israel committing national suicide in exchange for nothing. The Arab plan - formerly the "Saudi Plan," and before that, the Tom Friedman "stick it to Israel 'peace' plan" - calls for Israel to retreat to the indefensible 1949 armistice lines and expel hundreds of thousands of Jews from their homes in Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. It also involves Israel agreeing to cease being a Jewish state by accepting millions of foreign, hostile Arabs as citizens within its truncated borders.

The day an Israeli government accepts the plan - which again will form the basis of the Obama "peace conference" - is the day that the State of Israel signs its own death warrant.

Then there is the other Obama plan in the works. Obama also intends to host an international summit on nuclear security in March 2010. Arab states are already pushing for Israel's nuclear program to be placed on the agenda.

Together with Obama administration officials' calls for Israel to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - which would compel Israel to relinquish its purported nuclear arsenal - and their stated interest in having Israel sign the Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty - which would arguably force Israel to allow international inspections of its nuclear facility in Dimona - Obama's planned nuclear conclave will place Israel in an untenable position.

Recognizing the Obama administration's inherent and unprecedented hostility to Israel, Netanyahu sought to deflect its pressure by giving his speech at Bar-Ilan University in June. There he gave his conditional acceptance of Obama's most cherished foreign policy goal - the establishment of a Palestinian state in Israel's heartland.

Netanyahu's conditions - that the Arabs generally and the Palestinians specifically recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state; that they relinquish their demand that Israel accept millions of hostile Arabs as citizens under the so-called "right of return"; that the Palestinian state be a "demilitarized" state; and that Arab states normalize their relations with Israel were supposed to put a monkey wrench in Obama's policy of pressuring Israel.

Since it is obvious that the Arabs do not accept these eminently reasonable conditions, Netanyahu presumed that Obama would be forced to stand down.

What the prime minister failed to take into consideration was the notion that Obama and the Arabs would not act in good faith - that they would pretend to accept at least some of his demands in order to force him to accept all of their's, and so keep US pressure relentlessly focused on Israel.

Unfortunately, this is precisely what has happened.

Ahead of Obama's meeting on Tuesday with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, Al-Quds al-Arabi reported that Obama has accepted Netanyahu's call for a demilitarized Palestinian state. Although Netanyahu is touting Obama's new position as evidence of his own diplomatic prowess, the fact is that Obama's new position is both disingenuous and meaningless.

Obama's supposed support for a demilitarized Palestinian state is mendacious on two counts. First, Palestinian society is already one of the most militarized societies in the world. According to the World Bank, 43 percent of wages paid by the Palestinian Authority go to Palestinian militias. Since Obama has never called for any fundamental reordering of Palestinian society or for a reform of the PA's budgetary priorities, it is obvious that he doesn't have a problem with a militarized Palestinian state.

The second reason his statements in support of a demilitarized Palestinian state are not credible is because one of the central pillars of the Obama administration's Palestinian policy is its involvement in training of the Fatah-led Palestinian army. US Lt.-Gen. Keith Dayton is overseeing the training of this army in Jordan and pressuring Israel to expand its deployment in Judea and Samaria.

The US claims that the forces it is training will be responsible for counterterror operations and regular police work, and therefore, it is wrong to say that Dayton is raising a Palestinian army. But even if this is true today, there is no reason not to assume that these forces will form the backbone of a future Palestinian army. After all, the Palestinian militias trained by the CIA in the 1990s were trained in counterterror tactics. This then enabled them to serve as the commanders of the Palestinian terror apparatus from 2000 until 2004, when Israel finally defeated them. It is the uncertainty about these forces that renders Obama's statement meaningless.

And that gets to the heart of the problem with Netanyahu's conditional support for Palestinian statehood. Far from deflecting pressure on Israel to make further concessions, it trapped Israel into a position that serves none of its vital interests.

For Israel to secure its long-term vital national interests vis-a-vis the Palestinians, it doesn't need for the US and the Palestinians to declare they agree to a demilitarized state or for a Palestinian leader to announce that he recognizes Israel's right to exist or even agrees that Israel doesn't have to commit national suicide by accepting millions of Arab immigrants. For Israel to secure its national interests, Palestinian society needs to be fundamentally reorganized.

As we saw at the Fatah conclave in Bethlehem last week, even if Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas were to accept Netanyahu's conditions, he wouldn't be speaking for anyone but himself. Fatah's conclave - like Hamas's terror state in Gaza - gave Israel every reason to believe that the Palestinians will continue their war against Israel after pocketing their state in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. There is no Palestinian leader with any following that accepts Israel. Consequently, negotiating the establishment of a Palestinian state before Palestinian society is fundamentally changed is a recipe for disaster.

Furthermore, even if Netanyahu is right to seek an agreement with Mitchell next week, he showed poor negotiating skill by preemptively freezing Jewish construction. Domestically, Netanyahu has lost credibility now that the public knows that he misled it. And by preemptively capitulating, the prime minister showed Obama that he is not a serious opponent. Why should Obama take Netanyahu's positions seriously if Netanyahu abandons before them before Obama even begins to seriously challenge him?

Beyond the damage Netanyahu's actions have inflicted on his domestic and international credibility is the damage they have caused to Netanyahu's ability to refocus US attention and resolve where it belongs.

As the prime minister has repeatedly stated, the Palestinian issue is a side issue.

The greatest impediment to Middle East peace and the greatest threat to international security today is Iran's nuclear weapons program. A nuclear-armed Iran will all but guarantee that the region will at best be plagued by continuous war, and at worst be destroyed in a nuclear conflagration.

Netanyahu had hoped that his conditional support for Palestinian statehood, and his current willingness to bar Jews from building homes in Judea and Samaria would neutralize US pressure on Israel and facilitate his efforts to convince Obama to recognize and deal rationally with the issue of Iran's nuclear weapons program. But as Ambassador Michael Oren made clear on Sunday, the opposite has occurred.

In an interview with CNN, Oren said that Israel is "far from even contemplating" a military strike against the Islamic republic's nuclear installations. He also said, "The government of Israel has supported President Obama in his approach to Iran, initially the engagement, the outreach to Iran."

From this it appears that Israel has not only made no headway in convincing the administration to take Iran seriously. It appears that Jerusalem has joined the administration in accepting a nuclear-armed Iran.

It is possible that Oren purposely misrepresented Israel's position. But this too would be a disturbing turn of events. Israel gains nothing from lying. Oren's statement neutralizes domestic pressure on the administration to get serious about Iran. And if Israel attacks Iran's nuclear installations in the coming months, Oren's statement will undoubtedly be used by Israel's detractors to attack the government.

Some critics of Netanyahu from the Right like Ariel Mayor Ron Nachman claim that it may well be time to begin bringing down Netanyahu's government. They are wrong. We have been down this road before. In 1992, the Right brought down Yitzhak Shamir's government and brought the Rabin-Peres government to power and Yassir Arafat to the gates of Jerusalem. In 1999, the Right brought down the first Netanyahu government and gave Israel Camp David and the Palestinian terror war.

There is another way. It is being forged by the likes of Vice Premier Moshe Ya'alon on the one hand and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee on the other.

Ya'alon argues that not capitulating to American pressure is a viable policy option for Israel. There is no reason to reach an agreement with Mitchell on the administration's bigoted demand that Jews not build in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem. If the US wants to have a fight with Israel, a fight against American anti-Jewish discrimination is not a bad one for Israel to have.

Ya'alon's argument was borne out by Huckabee's visit this week to Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Huckabee's trip showed that the administration is not operating in a policy vacuum. There is plenty of strong American support for an Israeli government that would stand up to the administration on the Palestinian issue and Iran alike.

Netanyahu's policies have taken a wrong turn. But Netanyahu is not Tzipi Livni or Ehud Olmert. He is neither an ideologue nor an opportunist. He understands why what he is doing is wrong. He just needs to be convinced that he has another option.

caroline@carolineglick.com




check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows Live™ goes way beyond your inbox. More than messages



Friday, August 21, 2009

Yaalon! - Partners with Feiglin - Ketzele Opens Office in Shdema!

bs"d

What do Yaalon, Feiglin and Ketzele all have in common?  They want Judea and Samaria safe in Jewish Hands!

Yaalon vice premier and strategic affairs minister of Israel and Feiglin seems to have forged a political partnership..reports Jpost.com  

 "Yaalon was upset with recent change in the law -- pushed through by Netanyahu -- regarding the Israel Land Authority
." 

One need not be a general to come to the same conclusions based on Torah.
Selling Land to a Non Jew is against the Torah.http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2009/08/selling-land-to-non-jew-against-torah.html

When will a strong Torah Voice with Feiglin, Yaalon and  Yakov Katz of National Union and other Knesset members from faith based parties become a  political reality?Acheka Lo (Let us be patient and wait...)

 Yaakov Katz (Ketzaleh), head of the National Union party, has written a sharp letter to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu in light of the ongoing decrees against the Jews of Judea and Samaria,Ketzale has joined Women In Green,  at Shdema!   Ideologically thay are all on the same page!  National Union: Katz vs. Netanyahu, Ben-Ari vs.Ministers

The Torah unites and is the common denominator for all  Jews, both the Chilonim and the Chareidim. 

As Rav Amnon Yitzchok of Shofar says he would rather be a chiloni that observes the Mitzvoth than a chareidi that doesn't. 

Arlene Kushner:

see my website www.ArlenefromIsrael.info

August 20, 2009

 

"Yaalon!"

 

Moshe "Bogie" Yaalon has been demonstrating courage and clarity of purpose of late.  He has spoken out on a number of issues and is to be applauded for doing so. 

 

So often it happens: those who at one time seemed to support certain issues begin to view things differently  once they become ministers. Or else they become strangely mute.  After all, there is party allegiance to consider -- all-important for one's political future.  And there is status, and the need to protect the perks of office.

 

We all know what I'm talking about.  We've all felt the disappointment of hoping that a particular member of the government would take principled stands, only to find that he or she ultimately does not.

 

~~~~~~~~~~

 

But now it is becoming clear that we may have in Strategic Affairs Minister and Vice Premier Moshe Yaalon someone who actually cares more about his nation and his principles than he does about his political future.  

 

This is not something that should go unnoticed or unsupported.  In fact, Yaalon needs our support big time.

 

~~~~~~~~~~

 

For Zionist reasons, Yaalon was upset by the recent change in the law -- pushed through by Netanyahu -- regarding the Israel Land Authority, so that now private purchases are permitted of what has to date been Israel-owned land.  He threatened to resign, and, in a deal with Netanyahu, was appointed head of a committee to decide on limits to that law.

~~~~~~~~~~

On Sunday, he spoke at a rally for Moshe Feiglin -- Netanyahu's ideological/political opponent and head of the Manhigut Yehudit faction within the Likud.  In his speech, was which reported by Channel 2, Yaalon said:

 

"There are certain things we need to say – up to here. When you do things you don't believe in, you enter a slippery slope because they put pressure on you, and you keep rolling downwards."

"I, for one, am not afraid of the Americans.  I believe that Jews have the right to live anywhere in the land of Israel forever."

He also criticized the far left.  And it seems he singled out Peace Now, which he referred to as a "virus."

~~~~~~~~~~

Then on Monday, in the company of other ministers, Yaalon visited some "unauthorized" outposts in Samaria.  Following the visit, he gave an interview explaining that so called "illegal" outposts are not actually "illegal," as they have approval from many sources already (as I've explained here), but just need a final approval that can still be provided -- making them fully legal.

 

~~~~~~~~~~

 

Well!  Our prime minister is not responding positively to his minister of security.  In fact, he summoned Yaalon to his office yesterday to register his discontents, which are numerous.

 

The prime minister's office then issued a statement:

 

"...the remarks made by Minister Ya'alon are unacceptable, neither in their essence nor in their style, and do not represent the government's stance.

"In the face of the pluralism of opinions in the Israeli public, the prime minister believes mutual respect and unity must be maintained. This is right for any time, and especially for these times."

And tonight Netanyahu is meeting with him again -- cutting his vacation short to do so.  Reportedly he didn't like the implicit criticism of Obama and the support for the unauthorized outposts -- a position that flies in the face of Obama's demands that we take them down.  (It should be mentioned -- it is surely not unrelated -- that Netanyahu is scheduled to meet with Mitchell soon.)  There was also, as has been made clear, distress over Yaalon's politically incorrect position with regard to the far left.

 

~~~~~~~~~~

 

I say bravo to Yaalon for being forthright in his positions. Wonderful indeed to know that someone high up in government is not being obsequious in his approach to the US (which is how I yesterday described Netanyahu's decision to refrain from issuing building tenders in Judea and Samaria).  A relief to hear someone say out loud that we have a right to live anywhere in the land we wish.  

 

Yaalon should be cloned several times over.  Particularly is this important as it turns out we have a prime minister who is not as attentive to the right flank of his coalition as he should be -- considering that he argued that it was because of the mandates achieved by the right that he should be given the first opportunity to try to form the coalition.  Netanyahu's been slip-sliding leftward.  

 

~~~~~~~~~~

 

Feiglin called the prime minister's summons of Yaalon an "overreaction," and I would agree. 

"Ninety percent of the public agrees with what Ya'alon said, and the fact that Netanyahu is trying to scare him after saying it proves that he is acting not on behalf of the public but on behalf of the elites that control him," Feiglin said.

~~~~~~~~~~

Yaalon's spokesman said he knew the radio show was being taped, but that his views are clear and well known.  Yaalon stands by what he said.  (What? No backtracking?  No hedging or double-talk?  Also a pleasant state of affairs.)

~~~~~~~~~~

Peace Now called Yaalon "paranoid" and a "danger to Israeli democracy."  This is an attempt to stifle him and read him out of the fold.  In fact, this organization that legally does not exist has demanded that Netanyahu fire him.

Our self-serving, ever-political and ever-politically correct defense minister praised Peace Now (save us from this!) as "an integral part of the discourse in Israeli society."

~~~~~~~~~~

There is an essential "rightness" (double entendre intended) about Yaalon's positions. He must be praised for defending our prerogative in settling our land.  As well, his readiness to stand independent of Obama is much welcome.  How wearisome and ultimately destructive it becomes to try to please and second guess a US president who is essentially anti-Israel.

And, I would add, there is an issue of free speech in a democracy implicit in what's going on here.  It is attempts to muzzle Yaalon that are properly labeled a "danger to Israeli democracy," not his speaking out.  Those attempts need to be fought. Those of us who are on the right must not tolerate being relegated to the category of "kook" or "danger."  It's a convenient corner into which too many of our adversaries have sought to push us.

As to the organizations on the far left, I can only concur most wholeheartedly with what Yaalon has said.  I have done sufficient research to understand the ways in which these groups seek to undermine all that we stand for as a sovereign Jewish state.  I will return to this issue, which is far too extensive too take on here.  But you might like to take a look at my report on Adalah, for insight into what's going on: 

http://www.israelbehindthenews.com/library/pdfs/InsideAdalah.pdf

Now I simply share my frequent distress at seeing far left organizations being given extraordinary latitude within our society to damage our society, all allegedly in the name of democracy.  Thus, is Yaalon's forthrightness -- his readiness to take on the threat from within -- to be praised.  He may have made it permissible at last to ask publicly, "What the hell is going on here?".

~~~~~~~~~~

And so, PLEASE!  Let Bogie Yaalon know that you are grateful that he has said publicly what so many of us think, that he stands behind his principles and is willing to incur political costs to do so:

Minister for Strategic Affairs Moshe Ya'alon

Fax: 02-6667516                                                                                                                             Phone: 02-6408891                                                                                                                               E-mail: myaalon@knesset.gov.il

Additionally, let Binyamin Netanyahu know that you are grateful for the principled and forthright statements of Yaalon and that you stand behind his right to espouse the positions he does without penalty:

 

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu 

 

Fax: 02-670-5369

 

Phone: 03-610-9898 

E-mail:  pm_eng2@it.pmo.gov.il (underscore after pm)

 

~~~~~~~~~~

 

This is a beginning.  It's clear, it's simple.  It is important in fighting a fight that must be fought.

 

~~~~~~~~~~


womeningreen.org

From: Nadia and David Matar [mailto:nmatar@netvision.net.il]
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 6:07 AM
Subject: Ketzele opens office in Shdema- כצלה פותח לשכה בשדמה

 

בס"ד   יום שישי ראש חודש אלול תשס"ט

 

ENOUGH SHAME!  SHDEMA IS JEWISH!

 

Tens of people showed up in SHDEMA today Friday August 21st,2009 to protest the latest wave of vandalism by the Arabs and international anti_israeli activists who had come over the past two weeks to Shdema, besmirched the Israeli flag and destroyed part of our storage room.

 

The morning started with a shiur by Rabbi Shimon Ben Zion from kiryat Arba Hevron, teacher in Machon Meir, great fighter for Erets Israel (in Chomesh, on hill 26 in Kiryat Arba, Hazon David,  and many other places).

 

After the shiur, the tens of activists who had come from all over Israel to strengthen the Jewish presence in Shdema, marched from the top of the hill to the illegal Arab construction, funded by US and European money, at the bottom of the hill.

 

At the head of the march was member of Knesset Yaakov Katz (Ketzele) from the National Union who promised to open an office in Shdema and to work from Shdema.

 

Among the tens of participants, we had the pleasure and honor to have with us a AFSI delegation: Helen Freedman, executive director of AFSI and Bill and Sylvia Mehlman, aFSI Jerusalem who saw from close the discrimination against the Jews:

While Arabs are allowed to build an entire campus on land that is Israeli controlled (!) . the government does not allow any Jewish building or construction!!

 

After the march the participants returned to Shdema to clean and paint the walls that had been vandalized.

 

We would like to thank Arutz 7 for being there in Shdema faithfully and constantly.

 

The Committee for a Jewish Shdema has decided to increase its presence in shdema by coming almost every day for a few hours where we will work on fixing up the buildings. Volunteers who want to join and professional workers (kablanim, installators, electricians etc..) are asked to contact us and tell us how they can help. Donations of building materials will be welcomed too. (So will financial donations )

 

The daily shifts in Shdema will start please G-d this coming Sunday, August 23rd, at 4:00pm.

 

Please contact Nadia Matar 0505500834

Or Yehudit Katzover 0507161818

 

Shabbat shalom,

The Committee for a Jewish Shdema and Women in Green

 

For the link to the arutz 7 newsreport on Shdema with a video report

http://www.inn.co.il/News/News.aspx/193378

For pictures by Rivka Ryback and Yossef Hartuv

http://www.yeshabulletin.com/FIGHT%20BACK/FightBack.htm

 

Rachel is crying for her children - Prayer Elul!

bs"d

Yasher Koach to Evelyn Haies and the RCRF for a living presence in Kever Rochel.  Thank you Chana for sending.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: chana sokol <chanatovasokol2000@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:12 AM
Subject: from Chana Tova my Kever Rochel trip with lunch and Rabbi Leff & Prayer Elul
To: Robin Ticker <faigerayzel@gmail.com>




--- On Fri, 8/21/09, chana sokol <chanatovasokol2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: chana sokol <chanatovasokol2000@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Ched: my Kever Rochel trip with lunch and Rabbi Leff and prayer Elul Rosh Chodesh
> To: "Chedva Katz" <chedkatz@yahoo.com>
> Date: Friday, August 21, 2009, 3:54 AM
> to Chedva
> with Love
> enjoy photos
> holy and some shocking--since Kever Rochel is a fort hidden ( see photo 134)
> under three story stone fences and gunproof glass and metal
> window coverings.  This is what the Israeli government
> builds so Arabs can have rule 3 three miles outside of
> Jerusalem.  Shocking.  Thank G-d ladies have
> pushed to keep Kever Rochel opened for 12 years, including
> Evelyn Hayes.  Rabbi Leff spoke in the Bas Mitzvah room
> of the building next door to Kever Rochel.  Bonnie
>  and I are in one photo.  Lee was
> there,too. 
>      Thursday we went with a group and
> had pre-ordered lunch brought in from Israel Center caterer. 
 There is no place to buy water,
> fruit, anything--the area once had many Bethlehem Arab
> stores with flourishing businesses from Jewish praying
> people.  Then Arafat lead the Arabs to new politics
> that Arabs should not deal with Jews.  The Arabs with
> these politics became unemployed and blamed the Jews, when
> Arafat was the leading source only.
>      What was stores is now high walls
> to keep gunshots by Arabs in Bethlehem from Jews visiting
> Kever Rochel.  the three story walls protect nothing,
> because outside the walls are new Arab 5 story buildings including a hotel above the fenced in walls of cement.  So the Arabs can
> and do shoot from that new height.  Good question: why
> didn't the Israeli government stop the new buildings going
> above the protective expensive wall?
>     Better question: why do police harrass Jews
> who want Jerusalem to be a holy city sanctifying the
> Sabbath?  Wouldn't it be just the point that Sabbath be
> protected and not Arabs and anti-Sabbath observers.
>     This is the cry of Rochel.  She cries
> over these injustices.
>     see photos!  and email and put on
> facebook these above important messages, if you can.
>
>
>      


     

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Selling Land to Non Jew against Torah! : Fw: Foreign Arab tycoons bought land in Galilee

bs"d

Selling Land to Non Jew against Torah!

How come there isn't an outcry about this in the Torah World? Heter Mechirah brings an outcry and it's just a symbolic selling. Yet actual selling Eretz Yisroel is met  with SILENCE??????

http://torahmitzion.myhsphere.biz/eng/resources/show.asp?id=185

ParshaOnline
Back to Parsha List 
Parshat Behar
"And the Land Will Not Be Sold Forever"
Rav Yisrael Shachor, Former Rosh Kollel, Chicago Kollel, 2003
 "And the Land will not be sold for ever, for the Land is mine since you are aliens and residents with me." (VaYikra 25:23) Here the Torah explains the principle of the returning of land to its owner during Yovel/the Jubilee Year. We do not have absolute ownership of our properties in Israel for the Land of Israel is the inheritance of G-d. We live in the land as aliens and transients. Therefore we do not have the right to sell a field of our inheritance for more than the Yovel.
The Baal Halachot Gedolot explains that there is no Scriptural prohibition in our verse and therefore he does not count it in his enumeration of the Taryag mitzvot since this verse only describes a negation and not a prohibition. That is to say that the Torah is elucidating the impossibility of selling the land for perpetuity. However there is no action that is prohibited by this verse. Even if someone attempts to sell his field forever, the sale is nullified at Yovel and the field returns to its owner.
Many Rishonim disagree. Rashi explains that the Torah is admonishing the buyer not to retain the field by force upon the arrival of Yovel.
The Rambam (Shmitta v'yovel 11,1) wrote that if a man sold his field for perpetuity, the sale is invalid. However, both the buyer and the seller have transgressed a negative commandment. It appears that this is similar to interest in that even though both parties agree, they are doing something that is in opposition to the will of G-d. (The Ramban in Sefer HaMitzvot quotes the Rambam who posits that it is possible to make a sale on condition that the buyer does not return the property at the Yovel, just as one may make a loan on condition the Shmitta  does not cancel the debt. However, in our text of the Rambam it is not found.)
The Ramban writes at length regarding this mitzva. In his commentary on the Torah he poses the following challenge to Rashi: If the prohibition is essentially on the buyer, the Torah should have written, "You shall not buy the land in perpetuity."?!  He attempts to reconcile this by saying that if the prohibition was on the seller, the Torah should have written "You shall not sell…" However,  "Shall not be sold" can apply to the buyer as well. In conclusion the Ramban agrees with the Rambam that there is a prohibition to execute any sale forever and the prohibition is either on the seller or on both parties.
In his gloss on the Sefer HaMitzvot (lavim, 227) the Ramban adds that if a person sells without any stipulation of time he will certainly not violate this prohibition. Only if one states explicitly that the sale is for perpetuity does he contravene this negative commandment. Nevertheless, the Ramban goes on to quote from the Sages that bring this verse in the context of the halacha that a non-Jew has no right of acquisition in the Land of Israel (Gittin 47a). Acc0rding to this the Ramban offers a new and surprising interpretation: The verse prohibits the sale of the Land of Israel to gentiles because they are not commanded to observe the mitzvot of Shmita and Yovel and, as such, the sale to a gentile would be forever!
The Ramban establishes a parallel between this mitzva and the prohibition of selling a Jew as a slave to a non-Jew in a way that he will not be released during Yovel that appears in our Parsha. The reason is "For unto me the people of Israel are servants." The Ramban concludes, "…but, we must be careful that our sale of the Land should be in such a way that it return to us no matter what, and we should not leave it in their hands forever. And the Torah gave a similar reason as the reason mentioned in regards to (selling) people… For in his Land, may His Name be exalted and blessed, we are all aliens and transients with Him and He does not desire to settle anyone else in the Land but us. It shall remain and return to us."
We can see from the Ramban that the essence of the Passukis to prohibit the transfer of the Land to "strange" hands. This corresponds perfectly with the words of the Ramban in his commentary on the Sefer HaMitzvot (Mitzva 4) that there is a positive commandment to inherit the Land and that we should not leave it in the hands of any of the nations of the world. (There the Ramban is addressing the national aspect of the mitzva and here the individual one. Accordingly, one should explain the necessity of this verse in spite of the existence of a different prohibition  "You shall not give the non-Jew any encampment in the Land.")
Another surprising explanation is found in the Netziv's HaaMek Davar. He, too, connects this verse to the prohibition of selling to a non-Jew, but in a completely different manner. By introduction, the Netziv lived in the period of the first glimmer of the redemption and the settlement of Israel. One of the questions that engaged the new settlers and the great rabbis of that time and stirred tremendous controversy was the issue of how to deal with Shmita. There were those who backed theHetter Mechira/"Sale of the Land" because of the extenuating circumstances and dire economic conditions in order to support the fledgling settlement. However, the Netziv was opposed specifically because of his great love  for the Land of Israel and his belief in the return to Zion only through meticulous performance of the mitzvot, especially the mitzvot of the Land. More over, the mitzva of Shmita was especially critical in his eyes since it is identified as a cause of Exile. He, therefore saw it as a holy responsibility to observe the Sabbatical year in all of its details and was among the great rabbis who contested the Hetter Mechira
In his commentary on this verse the Netziv saw the command to refrain from selling any part of the Land of Israel to a non-Jew at any time, not just during Shmita. According to his understanding the word, "Tzmitut",  is not about selling the land in perpetuity. Rather it connotes an "absolute" sale. The Torah already "divined" that there would be Jews who would attempt to circumscribe the laws of Shmita by selling their land to a gentile for the year of Shmitah. Therefore, the Torah comes and admonishes us that we do not have ownership of the Land during the Sabbatical year. How can we sell it to a gentile!?
We conclude with the words of the Sforno that the Land of Israel is the "Land of G-d" and is not included in  "And the land he gave to men."


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: joe <hannajaffa@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Fw: Foreign Arab tycoons bought land in Galilee
To: Robin Ticker <faigerayzel@gmail.com>



----- Original Message ----- From: "joe" <hannajaffa@rogers.com>
To: "Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center" <info@israellawcenter.org>
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 10:25 AM
Subject: Fw: Foreign Arab tycoons bought land in Galilee


You have to do something to prevent this from happening.

Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 2:37 PM
Subject: Foreign Arab tycoons bought land in Galilee
[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA:  Supporters of Netanyahu's initiative note that
the sale of publicly owned land to foreign elements via third parties would
be prevented under the program by the recording of a permanent  warning note
in the Lands Registry records for each parcel in the program requiring the
approval of a Government authority for the transfer of ownership of the
parcel to a foreigner.]

'Arab tycoons bought land in Galilee'
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST Aug. 15, 2009
http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=45207

Wealthy individuals from Arab states that do not have diplomatic relations
with Israel have recently procured hundreds of dunams of private
agricultural land in the Galilee, Israel Radio reported on Saturday.
Farmers in the Galilee tried to unite in an effort to thwart the sale, which
was reportedly funded by tycoons from the Persian Gulf, but did not succeed
in raising sufficient funds to buy the land from its owners, who were forced
to sell after suffering from financial problems.

The Israel Lands Administration (ILA) told the radio station that it could
not interfere with the transaction since the lands are privately-owned and
not state property.

Agriculture Minister Shalom Simhon (Labor) said in response to the report
that the issue was not his responsibility.

Meretz party head and former agriculture minister Haim Oron said that the
incident proves that the supporters of the Israel Lands Administration
reform plan were misguided.

Kadima MK Nachman Shai issued a press release saying that what everyone has
feared finally happened, and "Israeli lands are being sold to the highest
bidder."

"The Israel Land Authorities reform is a loophole calling out to the robber,
and it will attract, as expected, Arab investors from abroad, who will
eventually gain control over significant pieces of land in Israel," Shai
wrote in a statement.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has argued that the fact that 93% of land
in Israel is public-owned abets obstructionist bureaucracy and that
unsnarling red-tape is in everyone's interest.

Rebecca Anna Stoil contributed to this report

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il

--------------------------------------------