Nobody sincerely Jewish really wants to see innocent people die in a tragic fire. Nobody here gloated about these Jihad moments of glory for the honor of Israel as typically do the Mothers of Palestinian terrorists. Palestinian Mothers in contrast are so proud of their Jihadist children who are willing to sacrifice their lives for Allah and for Palestine. They are promised great rewards in heaven for this supreme sacrifice. They have been educated to be Jihadists from a very young age. Their heroes whom their schools and streets are named after, are so greatly admired and honored for their Jihadist acts of heroism. Those who succeed in murdering the greatest number of innocent Jews are the ones most admired and the ones to emulate.
The Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, the Chief of the General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, the Inspector-General of the Israel Police and the Coordinator of Operations for Judea, Samaria and Gaza. In accordance the proposal of the Prime Minister and Defense Minister and in conformity with the opinion presented by the Attorney-General, defense and police officials, the Government decided as follows:
"In accordance with its authority under Clause 8 of the Order for the Prevention of Terrorism, (1948), and supplementing the announcement published in the Official Gazette (No. 3305, Page 1436), the Government declares that the groups designated hereunder are terrorist organizations:
(a) The Kach Movement, whose central activists are today Baruch Marzel, No'am Federman and Tiran Pollak;
(b) The Kahane Chai Movement, whose central activists today are Binyamin Kahane, David Axelrod and Yekutiel Ben-Yaakov.
In many non-democratic countries, administrative detention is used by the ruling regime to suppress dissent and sanction opponents of the government. In Asia in particular, administrative detention was first introduced by the British and French colonial authorities prior to and during World War II. Created as a mechanism to control political dissent, it has ironically survived and made its way into the law books of the now-independent former colonies, who legitimized its use against their own political opponents in their constitutions.[6] In many cases, they were and codified as "emergency measures" or "internal security" acts.
After E spent three months under house arrest, with no break in the case, the Shin Bet requested approval from then-attorney general Yehuda Weinstein to use coercive interrogation techniques. That kind of permission is normally granted only when authorities believe the suspect is a "ticking time bomb," someone who has direct knowledge of an imminent terror attack. http://www.mishpacha.com/Browse/Article/9880/Rose-Report-Parents-of-Duma-Suspect-Speak-Out
Torture of Duma Boys. Article in Arutz Sheva: Torture of a Jewish Child by Boaz Shapira
I would like to focus on the harsh tortures suffered by several Jewish youths, the vast majority of whom were released without charge, while two others were prosecuted in a mini court for the admissibility of "confessions" given after severe torture of the Jewish youths.
One of those interrogated testified that they had placed him on a low chair with no backrest, shackled to a chair, and his legs were bent back under the chair and tied to a chair. In this situation, the interrogators forcibly bent his back until his head touched the floor and his back formed an "opposite arc" and held it for long periods of time for a whole night, and for three nights. The pain caused by torture to him was unbearable. The interrogators screamed at him that he must confess to the murder and crimes that the interrogators dictated (and he had nothing to do with them) in order to stop the torture.
The interrogated was willing to admit to everything in order to stop the inferno pain of the torture.
Court to determine admissibility of Duma arson defendants' confessions. Meanwhile these kids have been sitting in jail waiting for a trial. This alone is outrage and against Rabbinic Law according to Rabbi Mordechai Tendler[Robin]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B86sGl9yfinjNGtTdzY1VTBpOEgxc2NYa21KUnJvSFE3X1VJ/view
Court to determine admissibility of Duma arson defendants' confessions
"To show that torture is not so terrible, the prosecution dares to write to the court that while torturing, they stuck to the rules, used judgment, and the most outrageous thing—they write that everything has been done while 'maintaining the defendants' dignity as much as possible.'
רות איזיקוביץ ה' ניסן תשע"ח March 21, 2018
Read the articles in the link above, published in
Robin Ticker
Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com