Friday, August 14, 2015

Fwd: [nashimbyarok-WIG] Outrageous administrative detention-מעצר מינהלי שערורייתי and my comments

bs'd

The facts have still to surface but my gut feeling is that there is a witch hunt against Jewish Settlers in order to portray them as "Jewish Terrorists".  Even when no one is actually convicted, the process itself libels and discredits the Settler communities in Judea and Samaria and makes it much easier in the future to destroy their homes and communities. It is was these psychological weapons used in the Gush Katif Expulsion that eventually enabled the operation to be successful.

Why the Government of Israel, sanctioned by a right wing gov't, is engaging in such acts of hostility against the Settlers is surprising and very disturbing!  Obviously there are pressures to which I am not privy to but surely, apologies or condemnations on behalf of the Settler community for acts that are not verifiable as being committed by Settlers is extremely damaging since it serves to further strengthen the idea that indeed there exists "Jewish Terrorists" within the Torah observant Settler community.

Let me clarify that the most right wing Settler, even if they quote the Torah on portions that seem to be incitement towards committing acts of violence are not different than speaking about "Ayin Tachath Ayin", Eye for an Eye.  Settlers with a Torah education that is based on Torah Shebichtav and Torah Shebaal Peh, the written and oral law,  understand that one needs a Rabbinical Court to implement the Burning of Idolatrous places of worship.  It is never advocated as an option for  individuals. It first must be determined by a Rabbinical Court like a Sanhedrin whether or not the Place of Worship is indeed Idolatrous.  There is a legal process before any actual military action is actualized according to the Torah. Yes it is conceivable that if a Sanhedrin  determines that a Place of Worship that promotes Child Sacrifice is idol worship (like sacrificing to the Molech) it might warrant it's destruction. Let me add that we have yet to establish a working Sanhedrin and that is one of the fears perhaps of those accusing the settlers...  

To accuse the Settlers of Price Tag Revenge is probably the work of implanted provocateurs of those who wish to discredit the Settlers. IF indeed they will find someone guilty of such a crime it would  probably be someone who do not have a strong Torah upbringing such as the Soccar fan thugs. While individuals might have their own private opinion of what constitute Idol worship or worthy of burning according to Torah, just like individuals might carry opinions as per whether someone like OJ Simpson was guilty and worthy of a death sentence, are according to the American  Constitution allowed to be free to have such opinions and even voice them. However, they are not allowed to in any way actualize them or engage in any violent way that will take the law into their own hands. 

If one wishes to accuse another of violence in order to discredit them without any evidence, taking kids into Administrative Detention is the only way.  

 . 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <eli7@womeningreen.org.il>
Date: Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:34 AM
Subject: [nashimbyarok-WIG] Outrageous administrative detention-מעצר מינהלי שערורייתי
To: eli7@womeningreen.org.il


 

 

חברים יקרים

אסור לנו לשתוק על המעצרים המינהליים השערוריתיים של שלושת היהודים  שנזרקו לכלא לחצי שנה, ללא כתב אישום.

מצורף בזה מכתבו של ח"כ בצלאל סמוטריץ הנותן הסבר ורקע לדברים.

הציבור מתבקש  ליצור קשר עם נבחרי הציבור בממשלה ובכנסת ולהבהיר להם חד-משמעית את התנגדותוו למעצרים המינהליים האלו.

 

לרשימת השרים וחברי הכנסת: http://www.knesset.gov.il/mk/heb/mkindex_current.asp

 

שבת שלום

יהודית קצובר ונדיה מטר

 

 

 

בס"ד

Dear Friends

 

We cannot stay quiet as 3 Jews have been put in administrative detention for half a year without any accusation against them

We call upon all to call the ministers and Knesset members and pass on a strong message of opposition to this scandal

Below is the translation of MK Bezalel Smotrich's letter.that explains what is happening

Here is a link to Michael Freund's article:Administrative detention and the assault on civil liberties

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Fundamentally-Freund-Administrative-detention-and-the-assault-on-civil-liberties-411823

Government offices: http://www.pmo.gov.il/English/IsraelGov/Pages/GovMinistries.aspx

Knesset Members: http://knesset.gov.il/mk/eng/mkindex_current_eng.asp?view=1

Shabbat shalom

 

Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar

www.womeningreen.org

 

 

[LOGO]

The Knesset

MK Bezalel Smotrich

                                                                                                                        27 Menahem Av 5775

                                                                                                                        12 August 2015

 

To

Justice Minister

MK Ayelet Shaked

To

Defense Minister

MK Moshe Ya'alon

To

Minister of Internal Security

MK Gilad Erdan

To

Attorney General

Atty. Yehuda Weinstein

 

 

Distinguished Sirs and Madam,

 

Subject: The security services' lack of restraint in the manner that they deal with crime in Judea and Samaria

 

Unfortunately it seems that in recent days the Israel Police and General Security Services have lost all restraint in an attempt, which is important of itself, to locate the perpetrators of the severe incident in Kfar Duma.

 

The public noise, not to say, call for attack, and the resounding professional failure of the enforcement authorities until now in the prevention of such crimes and the identification of those who have carried them out, has deteriorated into what seems like actual hysteria, to the extent of a loss of control and the crossing of red lines that is difficult to accept in a democratic state of law.

 

Here are just a few examples of this hysterical and non-professional behavior:

1.       In recent days the Israel Police has gone to many heads of security in communities of Benyamin and demanded, without a warrant, to take recordings from all of the security cameras in the communities. Thus, across the board, resulting in a great intrusion of privacy and lack of respect to the residents of the communities in general, whose every step in recent days, no matter how personal or intimate, is exposed. It is inconceivable thus to harm the rights of so many people in so sweeping an action, in order to find a few perpetrators.

2.       Sunday, before sunrise, the police force descended upon the homes of seven families in the community of Adei Ad, awakened them and carried out a brutal search and ultimately, two people were arrested – one, a resident of Hevron who was required to attend an investigation and did not appear, and the other is a resident of the area and a member of the emergency unit of the community, and while a search was carried out in his house, an illegally owned bullet-proof vest was found… (the weapon that was found in his possession was legally owned). What is this if not hysteria?! What good does it do for the children of the seven families, after their traumatic meeting with the police, who will hate policemen for the rest of their lives?! What dangerous wanted criminals did they have to arrest there in such haste that justified waking up the children of a family before sunrise and causing them such a trauma as this search?!

3.       The outrageous administrative detentions, lacking specific connection to the incident at Duma (for example – the family of Eviatar Slonim told me that he was actually staying with his family on vacation when the incident occurred). About such things it is said, "Since the destroyer has the authority to destroy, he does not distinguish between the righteous and the sinner". Administrative detentions are a necessary evil to be used sparingly and when there is no other option. It is difficult to free ourselves of the feeling that the present wave of arrests is intended to compensate for past failures in investigating similar incidents and to appease impassioned public opinion. Have administrative detentions ever been used against organized crime in the State of Israel?! How is it that this tool is reserved only for the residents of Judea and Samaria?!

The three examples described above teach us about what seems like hysterical, unprofessional and unethical behavior, that serves no purpose other than to "check off" something on a list and to indulge the public and media hunger to see the system "do something". This behavior does great harm to the residents' rights and harms the public's faith in the law enforcement agencies no less.

 

I wish to take this opportunity to entirely reject any possible comparison that anyone might try to make in recent days between the treatment of Arab terror and the tools at the security system's disposal to deal with it and the treatment of very severe (!) actions that Jews have done against Arabs (assuming that it is Jews who did it).

 

The most common way to deal with crime and criminals in a democratic state is according to a criminal process and procedure, the balance between the need to defend society, to bring offenders to trial and to bring them to justice, and the need to maintain the rest of society's values, which, in general, are the rights of suspects and the accused within the framework of the process.

 

In the reality of battling against an enemy there is sometimes the necessity to use tools that are not normally used, among them the death sentence, demolition of houses as a deterrent to such deeds in the future, administrative detentions and so forth. We do not allow ourselves, and rightly so, to do this when faced with other severe social and criminal phenomena in society, including organized crime, which exacts a high price in blood, quite literally, and still does not justify the use of extra-ordinary tools for ordinary crime.

 

We are not engaged in a war against Jews! Crime is crime and it is the duty of law enforcement agencies to eradicate it. However, crime is not terror and crime perpetrated by citizens of a state does not make them enemies and does not justify acting outside the norm, as we must do in a war against enemies.

 

The various belligerent calls of "Jewish terror" and the intentions to give law enforcement agencies the tools at their disposal in the war against terror as well as against perpetrators who are citizens of the state, are populist and superficial and reflect an inability to make even a minimal distinction between complex situations. Your role as those responsible for the law enforcement agencies is to be able to deal with this complexity and navigate carefully between the delicate boundaries and this should dictate your policy.

 

Law enforcement agencies must display more professionalism and apparently also work harder in order to cope successfully with those few residents of the communities of Judea and Samaria who are suspected of criminal activity, but they must not be allowed to excuse a lack of professionalism and a lack of success by applying drastic tools from another world, including a grave blow to human rights, often regarding all the residents of Judea and Samaria (for example, the severe demand to take the recorded video from all of the security cameras in the communities of Binyamin).

 

As someone who has trust in the law enforcement agencies, I call on you not to be drawn into cheap and inflammatory populism and urgently to impose the necessary restraints on the law enforcement agencies.

 

Former president of the Supreme Court, Prof. Aharon Barak, often says that democracy is required to fight with one hand tied behind its back. If these words are correct in the Arab enemy's murderous war against terror, they are ten times as correct in dealing with brothers.

 

It is important to note, not incidentally, that regarding the incident in Duma, nothing has yet been proven to indicate that Jews are behind it. To the best of my knowledge, internal-Arab lines of inquiry, touching on internal conflicts between residents of the village, are also being investigated.

Sincerely

MK Bezalel Smotrich

 

 

 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nashimbyarok" group. This group is owned and operated by Women In Green For Israel's Tomorrow.
 
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nashimbyarok-womeningreen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
 
Visit our website at http://www.womeningreen.org
---
‏קיבלת את ההודעה הזו מפני שאתה רשום לקבוצה 'nashimbyarok' של קבוצות Google.
כדי לבטל את הרישום לקבוצה הזו ולהפסיק לקבל ממנה דוא"ל, שלח אימייל אל nashimbyarok-womeningreen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
לאפשרויות נוספות, בקר ב-https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker

Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan) and Howard Chaim Grief great activists and lovers of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichronum Baruch.  May their memories serve as a blessing. 

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

RE: Iran Deal. 2nd Town Meeting with Hakeem Jeffries and Listening Session in Brighton Beach


Bsd

אל המקום אשר...

Updated Nov 30, 2022

Now years later I have come to the conclusion that Hakeem has the characteristics of Amalek.


UPDATE:  Wednesday Sep. 2, 2015

Terribly Disappointed in Hakeem Jeffries!! 

I have something important to say to Hakeem Jeffries and each and every elected official and each and every one of us fighting this Iran deal that when we vote our conscience, when we stand up to fight evil,  it is good for our soul.  And whoever is a believer, knows that G-d is the King over all Leaders, good and bad.

Do not trust in princes, in the son of men, who has no salvation.  His spirit leaves, he returns to his soil; on that day, his thoughts are lost. Psalm 146:3
http://biblehub.com/psalms/146-3.htm 


Yes Hakeem, I thought you were made of something more everlasting...


See how I was deceived!

And again this post here shows that after this meeting, I was impressed with Jeffries....

 Guess I was wrong.  You clearly deceived. Too bad on you. Sincerely, 

========================================================================

I went to the 2nd meeting and I was sincerely impressed with Jeffries.  This time it was an open meeting and people really had a chance to voice their opinion. This time it truly was a listening session as their flier suggested. 

My conclusion is that we need to raise the bar on our demands.  Nuclear Iran is not an option since we are dealing with terrorists.  We must insist that we dismantle their capabilities! Israel can not accept anything less than that.  While Jeffries is not there yet, this time I sincerely felt he was open to listening.

Jeffries himself repeatedly stated that Israel lives in a tough neighborhood and he knows that the only language these guys respect is coming from a position of strength. I think that we need to do a more convincing job in presenting the military option coupled with crippling Banking sanctions by the US as the only option to stop IRAN. It was Jeffries himself over the course of the evening who actually spoke of these options.  Jeffries said that America has the capability to surgically take out the weapons buried deep in the mountains via MOP and Satellite GPS Technology. Capabilities that America did not have previously.  I googled MOP and came up with this interview with Defense Secretary Ashton Carter .  http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/10/politics/ash-carter-iran-north-korea-isis-al-qaeda/ 

Is the military option still on the table?
Carter said that the current framework for a deal with Iran does not take the military option off the table but added that it will currently not be used.
"We have the capability to shut down, set back and destroy the Iranian nuclear program and I believe the Iranians know that and understand that," he said, referencing the military's most powerful ground-penetrating bomb, the Massive Ordinance Penetrator (MOP).
The MOP -- which can explode 200 feet underground and is designed to destroy deeply buried and fortified targets -- is ready for use, Carter said.

Jeffries said that the reason the military option is not an option according to the Administration is because they believe if America goes that route it will trigger rockets raining over Israel, Tel Aviv and Haifa.  

My thoughts at the time was,  surely that is something Israel would wish to avoid as well.  According to Congressman Jeffries, there is still a very strong working relationship with American and Israeli Intelligence. Surely they can work together and figure out how to counteract this potential threat that comes coupled with a military option of striking Iran's nuclear facilities.  What came to mind was that surely those who were being taken to Auschwitz crematoria in the Cattle Cars would  have supported American air strikes bombing the train tracks to Auschwitz even if they were in direct line of fire.  One needs to look at the bigger picture!

Jeffries also, over the course of the evening said that from talking to banking experts, there are clearly  ways via the American banking system to also "attack" countries who are presently trying to do business with Iran.  Now that there are billions of released assets due to sanctions relief we need to somehow stop the flow of business deals which serve to empower and resupply Iran and terrorists with conventional weapons. But he also mentioned that since America has a high debt to countries like China and Japan, that limits us.  

My thoughts were:  Let us explore these options to the fullest and Make America Great Again (to coin Donald Trump). The fact that Jeffries has been looking into these options talks tons of the fact that indeed he is doing a thorough job investigating this deal and in keeping an open mind in exploring all options. 

Obviously, it was a very anti Iran deal crowd. The Russian community. This was a very educated and passionate group.  They allowed questions in Russian with a translator. The translator also translated the response into Russian.  Out of around a little less than 200 people, (as per the number of attendees according to Jeffries staff), I would say there were less then 10 who supported the deal. btw almost everyone signed in, so this count is pretty accurate. I happened to sit next to a women who was for the Deal.  She said "Let's give Peace a Chance".  I told her that actually the word "peace" is really "terror".  I told her that she is advocating for "Let's give Terror a Chance". She kept on insisting so I had no other choice to "Bless" her that indeed that she herself personally experiences the actualization of what she is advocating.  Actually I told her that in my opinion I was cursing her but if that was what she was advocating she should get what she is asking for. I think she was a bit confused after that. 

 It was very important to Jeffries to know how many people attended. Let me note that this meeting was organized within approx 2 days.  I'd say they got an excellent turnout.  They also had an accurate count of people who attended/signed in at  Jeffries Town Hall meeting in Mill Basin. http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2015/08/op-ed-brooklyn-event-hakeem-jeffries.html At the last meeting I had come in time for the question and answer period and as you can tell from my post, walked away with a very discouraging message from that meeting. I have asked friends who attended that meeting to also report on it so hopefully you will get different perspectives in forthcoming posts. However, my friends as well did seem to concur that the tone was one of fait acccompli.  Iran will eventually get a nuclear bomb and the goal is to monitor with inspections that are verifiable and to make sure that violations are detected but that the military option is not an option for now.

I felt that this meeting in Brighton Beach was much improved from the side of the Anti Iran position. 

 Since I came on time I did hear good points regarding why to reject this deal even choosing the diplomatic route (still the assumption was that a military option was not an option....)

Jeffries brought 2 people other than himself for the panel, one pro and the other con to present a balanced discussion.   Zachary K. Goldman, Executive Director of the Center on Law and Security at NYU School of Law gave good points but was nuanced.  He started off with the assumption that Diplomacy is the only way to go and from there built his case why the deal is bad. 

My guess is that his objective was to convince Jeffries on points that Jeffries can be convinced to vote against this deal. Probably the same held true with Omri Ceren of TIP who spoke at the last meeting in Mill Basin representing the anti Deal side also nuanced.

Some Points of Zachary Goldman:

  • Purpose of deal is to pave the way for economic and diplomatic normalization of Iran. 
  • If America votes for the deal there is a fear that US will lose leverage that will prevent US to do anything in the case that Iran violates the agreement. 
  • Snap Back. When violations to the deal are detected, the ability to reimpose sanctions won't really happen when the violations are a little at a time.  Over time however the violations will accumulate and snap back will not have happened.. 
  • Timing of Deal - Not permanent.  Some clauses expire after 8 years, some after 10 some after 15 and some after 25 years but after a given time frame, Iran is no longer constrained. 
Points in favor of deal as told by the White House according to Jeffries:
  • the purpose of this deal is primarily to stop a Nuclear Iran (In order for the Iranians to agree we must then offer them something in return which is sanction relief which unfortunately helps them with conventional weapons and gives money to increase terror)
  • Sanctions are only effective when there was a consensus of all the countries. Germany, France, Russia, England,China, USA etc. 
  • The Iranian people are Pro American even while the Regime itself is anti American
Jeffries was leaning towards rejecting this deal but advocated for continued Diplomacy.

The pro Iran deal guy, Joel Rubin, President of Washington Strategy Group did a very poor job in my opinion. These were his points:
  • This deal will block Iran to nuclear weapons for 10 years
  • We cannot stop Iran from getting a bomb.  Only Iran can decide not to get a bomb
  • This deal is verifiable. The US Atomic Energy Commission will be visiting all nuclear sites and we will have rock solid verifiable knowledge of noncompliance.
  • The World is with us. All major powers are with us.  US acting alone with sanctions didn't work.
This time the question answer period was real.  People lined up to ask their questions. There was no middle man and no need to be escorted for disturbing. People actually were able to boo but it was kept to a minimum. Jeffries seemed genuine in  hearing and listening to  anyone who wished to speak and answered with respect and empathy and often with agreement. While he had told the audience that his decision will not be based on emotion but rather on facts he was extremely empathetic when an elderly gentlemen pleaded with him not to allow a Nuclear Iran and begged him to please stop it from happening.

I felt he genuinely listened to my points/questions.  (The aid who was in charge of the line looked at me and my papers and warned me to keep it under 30 secs.}  I thanked Jeffries for holding this meeting and told him I was very impressed with the breath of knowledge and honest evaluation of this deal.  My points were as follows though they might not have been said in this order.  
  • I rejected Joel Rubin's remark that only Iran will decide not to get a bomb.  I told him that's like saying only a murderer can decide whether to have weapons.  Is that rational?  Jeffries seemed to agree.  I told him that I come from Hebron since I made Aliya and lived there for several years and that the phrase "Yes We Can" actually comes from the Hebrew phrase "Aloh Naale Ki Yachol Nuchal"  Which means We will Conquer the Land Because Yes WE CAN.  There ARE ways to stop Iran for obtaining a Nuclear bomb.
  • As for Rubin's claim that the deal is verifiable, IT IS NOT VERIFIABLE.  The one to ask whether it is verifiable are the people in harms way like Israel.  Only Israel can be trusted to say whether or not it is Verifiable.  I told him that not only don't we trust Iran we don't trust Obama (I got a lot of applause on that one). How did Obama bring the deal to the Unite Nations without getting Congress Approval???? (He seemed to like that point as well) . I said even a die-hard Democrat like Schumer or a die-Hard Democrat like himself can agree and it's just a sad reality (since who wants to mistrust the President of the US)
  • As for the argument that we need the world with us,l I told him that according to Jewish Law, there is a concept "Acharei Rabim LeHatoth velo LeRaoth" that we  go after  the majority except in the situation where the majority is voting for evil.  Therefore even if 99 percent of the people vote a particular way, if it's evil we still need to go against the majority. 
The last question of the evening, (not mine) seemed to suggest that if Jeffries votes with the Deal he will not get reelected. Jeffries objected to the suggestion that his decision would be based on his political career and I felt he genuinely believed it. He said that this decision is weighing very heavily on him since he knows that the outcome can be catastrophic.

Many more town meeting are being scheduled. Jeffries wishes to visit all the communities in his District.  It is imperative that we show up and voice our concerns! I imagine that many other Elected officials will take Jeffries model and go to the people and listen to what they have to say.  Even if these troubling times it is a perfect example of How America is still a great country. The Spirit of Hebron must prevail for the benefit of both Israel and America and for Freedom and Democracy!





--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker

Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan) and Howard Chaim Grief great activists and lovers of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichronum Baruch.  May their memories serve as a blessing. 

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Tonight. VERY IMPORTANT MEETING WITH CONGRESSMAN HAKEEM JEFFRIES! RE: IRAN DEAL Thursday, August 13th - 6:30 PM at the Shorefront Y (3300 Coney Island Ave) in Brighton Beach.

bs"d

Updated Nov 30, 2022  as Hakeem Jeffries is elected as House Minority Leader:

Subsequent to this meeting in Brighton Beach it became apparent to me that Hakeem Jeffries has all the characteristics of Amalek and is not to be trusted. His deception was par excellence.

For additional reference on learning about the tactics of Amalek:


----------
Dear All: 

Please forward to all your friends, family email lists, contacts to attend this meeting. 

Hakeem Jeffries has been a strong outspoken supporter of Israel.   If he votes against this Obama Iran Deal, it will surely bring great momentum for others to follow suit and vote against this terrible deal.  Being that he is a Black Congressman no one can accuse him of being a black racist against OBAMA.  Jeffries is clearly trying to vote his conscience as Schumer advised. Schumer, a die-hard Democrat, took that courageous step for himself in spite of the expected horrendous backlash he is now receiving from the Obama Administration.  Jeffries, a die-hard Democrat,  can expect a similar angry response from the Administration.  Yet, when voting his conscience and doing the right thing he proves that he has great courage and leadership.  We wish him wisdom and fortitude to stand up to evil for the sake of his constituents and  the American People. 

Thank you David Kerner for sending the following: "Rep. Jeffries is a great friend of Israel.  See this video:Congressman Hakeem Jeffries speaks at a rally in support of Israel, in Dag Hammarskjold Plaza on July 28, 2014. https://vimeo.com/101967450"

This deal is bad for America, bad for the world and  in all likelihood, notwithstanding G-d's Protection over the Land of Israel and its people, will empower Iran to target Israel with it's newly acquired weapons from the windfall of this deal,  be it conventional or nuclear.  It will serve to destabilize a region where Israel is the rock and a beacon of light for Democracy and Freedom. 

Standing Strong with Israel means Standing Strong for America, a Nation Under G-d with Liberty and Justice for All.  Unfortunately, being true to the Democratic Party and it's founding ideals and being a supporter of Obama Policies and its current Administrations, especially support for this dangerous deal with Iran, are clearly in opposition one to the other as painful as it must be for any die-hard Democrat. 

From:Gennadiy Faybyshenko <gennadiy1981@yahoo.com>
date:Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:38 AM
subject:Reminder tonight town hall meeting with Congressman Jeffries

Hello everyone it was my pleasure seeing you all yesterday. However. We learned yesterday that Hakeem Jeffries again wants to make another town hall meeting based on the outcome of his constituents he is swinging towards going against the deal.
 
I need to make some points clear to everyone since this was mentioned many times. Our goal is not to educate ourselves or audience about the Iranian Issue, our goal is to convince congressman to vote against the deal and Hakeem mentioned yesterday to few individuals that he was impressed seeing such a turnout which he did not expected. Based on the witnesses who spoke to him, it seems now he is more on the against deal side.
 
To continue his efforts in involving voters in his decision making process, the congressman has scheduled another Town Hall meeting, this Thursday, August 13th - 6:30 PM at the Shorefront Y (3300 Coney Island Ave) in Brighton Beach.
 
This meeting is being organized on extremely short notice, but as  a result of the Congressman's heroic public statements at the first Town Hall, it is likely to be covered by the national media.
 
We must show our support for Congressman Jeffries in his independent and heroic decision making process and be there on Thursday night to make our voices heard
 
With less than a day to promote the event, we can only succeed if each of us will make plans to attend and takes immediate action to promote this event both by inviting our friends on Facebook and via emails/texts to our friends and family!  
 

--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker

Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan) and Howard Chaim Grief great activists and lovers of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichronum Baruch.  May their memories serve as a blessing. 

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Jewish Businessman, Steve Mamon, Rescuing Yazidi and Christian Women from ISIS

bs"d


--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker

Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan) and Howard Chaim Grief great activists and lovers of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichronum Baruch.  May their memories serve as a blessing. 

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Fwd: Ode to Senator Gillibrand

Bs"d

Senator Gillibrand
Take Schumer's Stand
Kill Iran Nukes
Before they destroy G-d's Land

Senator Gillibrand
Our Children Do Fear
The Threat of Iran
Is too much to bear

Senator Gillibrand
From this terrible deal
The suffering, the pain, the destruction
Maybe U 2 will feel

Senator Gillibrand will u be a Traitor?
And Trust Iran? America's Hater?

Senator Gillibrand
Don't stand with Obama
Iran Deal will lead to
Genocide and deep Trauma

Senator Gillibrand
You can still change your mind
Do you want on ur conscience
Death of Mankind?

Senator Gillibrand
What will you gain?
By joining with evil
As your claim to fame?

Senator Gillibrand
You surely will regret
Your vote for the Iran deal
Put us all under threat

Senator Gillibrand
We voted for u
Will u betray the trust
Of Both Gentile and Jew?

-