Thursday, April 04, 2019

Yazidis Demands for Help 2019. Letter to Secretary of State Pompeo. Lives and Property are in Grave Danger!

Bsd

Letter to Secretary of State Michael Pompeo March 15, 2019 by Shiekh Mirza Ismail leader of Yazidis.

See list of his urgent demands towards end of letter that are essential for their survival. 

See Mirza Ismail's letter to Rabbi Cooper of Simon Weisenthal Center in 2015 with urgent demands.   Many of  these demands were never met or insufficient.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B86sGl9yfinjREZkeUdVMTZfbm0xdnJLbFl2LWxjWhttp://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/261370GFNUjA0/view?usp=drivesdk

Yezidis were betrayed by the Kurds in 2007 and 2014  who were to defend them as they knowingly gave the Yezidis defenseless into the hands of ISIS.

 Often aid, allocated to Yezidis and other endangered  ethnic minorities never reach the intended recipients.

Yazidis have many enemies who want the Yazidi Land for themselves as it sits on precious oil fields and therefore don't have the Yazidi best interest in mind.

ISIS wasn't stopped or neutralized following the Yezidi massacre of the men and enslavement of the women  and children in Summer 2014. They conquered more and more Land  with more and more atrocities and victims from 2015 on, till Trump  and the Coalition intervened and supposedly defeated them.

 Had we tried to  find the Yazidi slaves and bring the slavemasters to justice maybe we could have stemmed  the horrific terror on more victims years ago.

But it turns out ISIS is really not defeated as much as we hope they would be. The continuing suffering of Yezidi women and children still in the clutches of their ISIS slavemasters can attest to that. There are very credible reports from Yazidi slaves that ISIS terrorists  regrouped and realligned with other terror elements in the region who often release ISIS members after capturing them!

The job is not over until the radical Islamic terrorists who have terrorized the Yazidis and other Ethnic minorities are brought to justice.

Secretary of State Pompeo should heed closely to these justified demands

The Trump Administration who prides itself in fighting evil,  can gather valuable intelligence working with  the Yezidis and persecuted Ethnic  minorities as they liberate and protect them,  and find and pursue the evildoers and bring them to justice before ISIS fighters resurface at a vengeance to victimize others..

Fwd: Hamodia: EXCLUSIVE: Eitan and Pollard - Who is the Real Rafi Eitan?


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <imra@imra.org.il>
Date: Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 11:34 PM
Subject: Hamodia: EXCLUSIVE: Eitan and Pollard - Who is the Real Rafi Eitan?
To: <imra@imra.org.il>


EXCLUSIVE: Who is the Real Rafi Eitan?
By Avraham Weissman Hamodia Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 5:49 pm
https://hamodia.com/features/exclusive-real-rafi-eitan/

When Rafi Eitan died on March 23 at the age of 92, the obituaries told about
his role in the founding of the Mossad and the capture of Adolf Eichmann,
and described him as a hero of Israeli intelligence — the ultimate
spymaster.

What was glossed over was his role in the story of Jonathan Pollard. Hamodia
has been covering the Pollard saga since it first began thirty-three years
ago. This exclusive investigative report, based on declassified CIA
documents, court records and previously unpublished conversations the
Pollards had with Hamodia more than a decade ago, as well as interviews
Eitan gave to media outlets over the years, reveals a very different Rafi
Eitan.

November, 1984, Paris, France

The air of the safehouse was thick with cigarette smoke. Among those in the
room were Rafael Eitan, who served as both the head of Lakam — which was an
intelligence agency under the auspices of the Israeli Defense Ministry — and
advisor on counterterrorism to then-Prime Minister Yitzchak Shamir; Joseph
Yagur, the Counselor for Scientific Affairs at the Israeli Consulate in New
York; and a young civilian American naval intelligence analyst named
Jonathan Pollard.

A few months earlier, Pollard, deeply concerned about the fact that
information vital to Israel's security was being deliberately withheld by
certain elements within the U.S. national security establishment, had begun
sharing with Israel classified material concerning military developments in
several Arab countries. Now he was meeting, for the first time, Eitan, in
his capacity as the head of the intelligence agency Pollard was working for.

Cognizant of what Pollard's motives were, Eitan presented at that meeting a
formal briefing to Pollard on the Middle East situation, which described how
Israel could be quickly overrun by a Syrian attack. He emphasized that
Israel faced a "technological Pearl Harbor" and badly needed access to the
material Pollard could provide.

According to a declassified CIA report, Eitan then shocked Pollard by asking
for "dirt" America had on Israeli political figures, as well as information
that would be politically useful to his patron, then-cabinet minister Ariel
Sharon, and other political figures.

The others in the room, standing behind Eitan, silently implored Pollard to
refuse. Yagur, for his part, "violently" shook his head no, and later
privately told Pollard that procuring such information would be grounds for
immediate termination of the operation.

Pollard made it clear to Eitan that he had no intention to provide any such
material. His sole motivation was Israel's security needs, and aiding Eitan's
political cravings was not on his agenda.

Then Eitan made another startling request. He wanted Pollard to obtain the
names of Americans spying on Israel, as well any information that would
identify Israeli officials who were providing information to the United
States.

This time, some of those behind Eitan shook their heads in the affirmative,
urging Pollard to agree.

But the young agent would have no part in compromising others, whether they
were American or Israeli, and flatly turned Eitan down.

"If you don't share with us who they are, one of these Americans will end up
killing you," Eitan warned him.

"So be it," Pollard defiantly declared.

(In contrast, Joseph Yagur, who at this meeting was named as Pollard's new
handler, emphasized that Pollard should seek military and scientific
intelligence on Arab states, Pakistan, and the Soviet Union in regard to its
role as the military patron of the Arabs.)

During the seventeen months in which Pollard handed over material to Israel,
he repeatedly voiced concern to his handlers about what would happen to him
if he were to be caught.

The orders were straightforward: In case something goes wrong, Pollard was
to stall the investigators as long as possible to give time for the Israelis
on the team to get out of the country. They instructed Pollard that, if
questioned, he should claim that he was passing information to Pakistan,
thus diverting attention from Israel. Most importantly, Eitan pledged that
Pollard himself would be exfiltrated and taken to Israel.

According to the CIA report, Eitan repeatedly promised that Israel would
take care of Pollard.

The last time the two men met, in a meeting that lasted only 15 to 20
minutes, Pollard once again told Eitan of his concern about detection.
Eitan, who appeared very angry, once again told Pollard that he had nothing
to worry about insofar as his personal security was concerned.

November 21, 1985, Washington, D.C.

When it became clear that the Americans had become aware of the operation,
Pollard followed the instructions he had been given. After he stalled the
FBI long enough for the entire Israeli team to flee the country, Pollard
called his contact number for his own instructions.

It was only then that he found out — to his utter shock — that there was no
escape plan in place for him. Instead, he was told to come to the Israeli
embassy in Washington.

While being followed by the FBI, Pollard and his former wife made their way
to the embassy.

The guards were awaiting him, and after he identified himself, the gates
opened and he was allowed to drive into the embassy compound — an
extraterritorial jurisdiction into which the FBI could not follow him.

For the first few moments it appeared that all was well, that the Israelis
would keep their word and offer refuge to their agent.

Then someone came out of the embassy building and whispered something into
the ear of the chief of security. He glanced at Pollard and then avoided his
gaze.

What Pollard did not know at the time was that embassy officials had
contacted Eitan and asked him what to do.

In a 2014 interview with Ha'aretz newspaper, Eitan recounted his response.

"I immediately said — throw him out," he recalled. "I don't regret it,"
Eitan added.

"Do you know who I am?" Pollard asked the guards who had been tasked with
throwing out their own agent.

They nodded.

"Do you know what they are going to do to me?" he queried.

They nodded again.

"I have an instruction to ask for your last report," the chief of security
told Pollard.

For a moment, Pollard didn't know whether the man was joking. He shrugged
and gave in his last report.

The guard then pointed to the gate and told him, "You have to leave the
embassy and walk in through the front door." Dozens of FBI agents had now
massed outside the embassy, awaiting their prey. Pollard pleaded with the
guards, but to no avail. He was forced to leave the compound and was
immediately taken into custody by the FBI.

In the days and weeks after his arrest, FBI and CIA agents who interrogated
Pollard told him repeatedly that they were shocked by his handler's
"callousness" and "lack of tradecraft." His interrogators expressed disgust
for a handler who would leave an agent without emergency training or
instructions and then abandon him to his fate.

* * *

Eitan didn't stop with having Pollard thrown out of the embassy. In a 2012
interview with Yediot Acharonot, Eitan revealed how he personally handed
over incriminating evidence to the Americans, knowing full well it would be
used to seal the fate of his own agent, Jonathan Pollard.

"It was not an easy moment," Eitan told the newspaper, "The government made
the decision, and I cooperated with the Americans against my agent."

* * *

Following his arrest, Pollard initially remained silent.

When the investigators showed Pollard the box of material that Eitan had
handed to the Americans — with Pollard's fingerprints still on it — they
told him, "Here is your reward for your silence, a present from your friend
Rafi Eitan."

In spite of this incriminating evidence, Pollard would only implicate
himself and refused to testify against anyone else.

Eitan was well aware of the crucial importance of Pollard's activities.

In a 2006 interview with Ronen Bergman of Yediot Acharonot, Eitan said, "We're
talking about information that was of such high quality, so accurate, so
good and so important to the country's security … After first looking
through the information, and following a thorough examination of the
materials by security experts, we realized the information was of critical
significance to the country's security.

"I would certainly say that, had a war broken out, the material Pollard
relayed would have greatly boosted the IDF and had a fundamental impact on
the battlefield," Eitan added.

Nor did he have any doubts about Pollard's motives.

"The man made an exceptional impression on me with his intellectual ability,
the detailed memory, the understanding of what was going on in the Middle
East, and his attachment and desire to help Israel," Eitan told Bergman.
"There's no doubt he placed himself in huge risk, and he fully realized
that, even without our explanations.

"Despite this, his motivation to help us, the State of Israel, was above and
beyond … I had great appreciation for an American Jew willing to risk
everything — his position in the U.S. Navy and in American society, and even
his freedom, in order to help Israel and save the lives of Israelis."

1998, Somewhere in Israel

For years, whenever Jonathan's wife Esther, who for decades led an
international effort to gain her husband's freedom, asked to meet with
Eitan, the latter refused.

Finally in 1998, Eitan consented and met with Mrs. Pollard, joined by their
pro bono Israeli lawyer Larry Dub and Israeli prisoner rights advocate Herut
Lapid.

As they began the conversation, which was described to Hamodia by Mrs.
Pollard in a previously unpublished conversation a decade ago, Eitan told
them the only thing he was sorry about was that he did not "finish the job"
before leaving the United States.

When asked what he meant by this, Eitan bluntly replied, "If I had been at
the embassy when Pollard came to seek asylum, I would have put a bullet
through his head. There would have been no Pollard affair."

Stunned, Mrs. Pollard and the others stared at Eitan as he continued:

"The next day, I would have seen to it that the news reports stated that an
American intruder had attacked a guard at the Israeli embassy — no mention
of any spy affair — and that in the scuffle a gun went off and the American
was killed. There would have been no Pollard case. That is the only thing I
am sorry about."

It is telling that, according to the Washington Post, "All intelligence work
is a partnership with crime," Eitan once told an Israeli media interviewer.
"Morals are put aside."

"That statement symbolizes the way Eitan looked at life and the way he
treated Jonathan Pollard," a close friend of the Pollards, who spoke on
condition of anonymity, told Hamodia on Sunday. "Such an attitude towards
Israel's enemies is understandable, but toward one's own agent is
unconscionable.

"Eitan had many opportunities to try to make amends for his evil deeds, but
in keeping with the words of Chazal (Eruvin 19a), which teaches that that
the wicked do not repent even at the gate of Gehinnom, he chose not to do
so," the friend added.

2019, New York, N.Y.

After serving 30 years in prison, Jonathan Pollard was granted parole in
November of 2015.

Yet he is far from a free man. His very harsh parole restrictions include
wearing a GPS monitoring system that consists of a bulky non-removable
transmitter installed on his wrist, and two box receivers that are plugged
into outlets in his cramped Manhattan studio apartment, which he shares with
his wife. Whenever he moves outside the range of the receiver, the
transmitter — which is three inches long and two inches wide — acts as a GPS
tracker and monitors his location. Were Mr. Pollard to step out of his
apartment to daven with a minyan or get some fresh air on Shabbos or Yom
Tov, the battery would quickly drain, forcing him to choose between
violating Shabbos or facing rearrest.

The parole restrictions also include a "curfew" that puts him under house
arrest between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. During the daytime, he is only
permitted to be in specific parts of southern Manhattan, and is even
prohibited from visiting Brooklyn. The restrictions also include the
unfettered monitoring and inspection of any computer he touches, including
those of any employer who might choose to hire him, which has prevented him
from being able to gain employment.

Since his release on parole, the Pollards have declined all requests for
media interviews.

However, the family friend told Hamodia that the media coverage of Eitan's
death brought back a flood of memories for the Pollards, who have been shown
many of the obituaries that have appeared in various newspapers. This
includes Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu eulogizing him as one of "the
heroes of the intelligence services of the State of Israel," and Mossad
Director Yossi Cohen saying that Eitan's "work and his actions will be
etched in gold letters in the annals of the state."

"Jonathan has probably read twenty such obituaries in the last few days,"
the family friend says. "He feels that the way the media is handling Eitan's
death symbolizes the way he was treated all these years by the government of
Israel.

"This is the man most responsible for Israel's betrayal of its own agent,
and he is the one who had Jonathan thrown out of the embassy. Now Jonathan
says he is 'being thrown out of these obituaries like roadkill …'"

In a series of painful conversations with his friend in recent days, Pollard
told him, "This is tragically typical of the government of Israel. Not only
how it treats its bona fide agent, but how it treats its soldiers and
citizens as a whole. They willingly accept our commitment and devotion, our
sacrificing everything we have for the sake of Israel, and then throw us to
the wolves when problems arise that threaten their political standing …"

A legal observer who has been closely following the Pollard case for many
years, but who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the
issue, says he found the media coverage troubling.

"They turned Eitan into a hero and continued to bury Jonathan Pollard," he
said.

A week after Rafi Eitan died, Ronen Bergman published in Yediot Acharonot
the last chapters of thirteen years of interviews with him, including an
interview Eitan gave him on the condition that it not be published until
after his death.

Bergman writes that Eitan expressed a deep regret over what happened to
Pollard and claimed, "We did everything in order to save him."

Eitan denied that he was the one who told Pollard to come to the embassy,
and ended the interview by saying, "Sometimes in quiet moments when I think
to myself, I think of the moment when I am going to meet with Jonathan."

"What are you going to tell him?" Bergman asked.

"I will ask for his forgiveness. I will ask forgiveness for the gehinnom
that he went through in jail. I apologize from the depth of my heart."

When Pollard's friend asked him about Eitan's statements to Bergman,
Jonathan described them as crocodile tears.

"There are two elements to teshuvah," Pollard told him. "One is expressing
regret. The other is making amends to correct the evil done to another.
Eitan had 33 years to do both and he did neither. Over the years, people
asked him about what he told my wife at that meeting in 1998 about his
regretting not putting a bullet in my head. He would just smile …

"What he supposedly told Bergman is contrary to everything he did all these
years," Pollard flatly stated, saying that not only did Eitan refuse to help
Pollard, he willfully interfered with efforts that his lawyers in Israel
undertook on his behalf.

"Not once did he express regret to me, my wife or anyone close to us,"
Pollard insisted.



Avraham Weissman: Some readers may wonder about the purpose of exposing the
shady past of a man only days after his death. The answer is simple: When an
intelligence chief who betrayed his own agent is depicted as paragon of
courage, not only are justice and historical accuracy victimized, but a
dangerous message is sent to the world about who deserves to be revered and
who deserves to be remembered in infamy.

It is vital that the truth be told so that all can know who are our villains
and who are our heroes.
________________________________________
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis

Since 1992 providing news and analysis on the Middle East with a focus on Arab-Israeli relations

Website: www.imra.org.il

For free regular subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe:            imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il

For free daily digest subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe-digest@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe:            imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il

IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES

עלילת דומא | Facebook. Phony Plea Bargain

Where exactly is your ‘Palestine,’ Mayor de Blasio? - Israel National News

Wednesday, April 03, 2019

Duma Plea Bargain. A Terrible Deal not for the sake of Truth! The Public Wants to Know! What Really Happened at Duma? With Real Facts and Evidence!


Bsd

Will we rely on testimony of a kid that is threatened with years of imprisonment for crimes he never committed unless he plea bargains??  

What value is Elisha's confessions at this point?  He admitted he would confess to anything to stop the ongoing torture! This charade of justice is psychological torture at it's best. 

These confessions only benefit the prosecution who advocates for those who prematurely slandered the Settler youth with the Duma arson.  This confession like the others was coerced and is worthless if it's the truth you are seeking. Who indeed were the perpetrators of the Duma arson?  Did anyone check out the Dawabshe family for clan infighting? Apparently not, as they don't fit the Given, the predetermined fact of the investigation, the Duma Blood Libel that they must be Jewish terrorist arsonists who murdered the Arab parents and their baby 

Facts and search for truth is the only evidence that should be permitted. Not self incrimination by someone whose freedom is being threatened if he doesn't comply.

Confessions by the tortured Duma suspects,  even in a plea bargain, are low life attempts to conceal the real guilty parties.

J'Accuse!  
The Prime Minister
 The President of Israel, 
The Defense Minister
The Justice Minister
Shabak, Jewish Division of Terror
Israel Supreme Court,
Knesset Members
Rabbanei Yesha
The Media 

who rushed to condemn acts of terror by Jewish Settler Youth. 

They are desperate for Elisha to plead guilty because if Elisha and or Amiram aren't guilty, and there are no Jewish Terrorists connected to this arson, then they are the guilty ones. 

They, using their positions of authority, speaking with confidence from positions of authority, generated a hoax narrative of an arson terror attack in Duma allegedly perpetrated by Jewish Settler Youth within 24 hours of it happening without seriously examining the evidence before rushing to conclusions and condemnations. 

Tens of Hilltop Youth among them Meir Ettinger and followers of the late Rabbi Meir Kahane were detained, interrogated, traumatized.  They came up empty handed! This was going on for a few months.  In December they were desperate. 

 Elisha and Amiram were their next scapegoats.   
Elisha and Amiram were separated from other religious youths, placed in isolation and in conditions that befit a ticking time bomb terrorist, denied habeas corpus, denied rights to see a lawyer. Elisha was placed in a staged prison with actors who acted like terrorists, terrified and traumatized to get him to confess. Duma happened in 2015. That is 3 years of harsh incarceration and trauma for a crime this minor never committed!

Elisha's lawyer does not represent Elisha.  Elisha's lawyer represents Netanyahu and all the above mentioned authorities in positions of power that put Elisha in prison for no reason. 

They were responsible of taking away his innocent youthful years....  They were responsible for torturing him physically and emotionally, he and his family,  on and off, these past three years. 

They smeared and slandered the name of innocent  Jewish Kids in order to produce a narrative that show that there are Jewish Terrorists just like there are Palestinian Terrorists.

Someone who would really represent Elisha would sue all the guilty ones for slander, physical and emotional trauma to last a lifetime and would win hundreds of millions of Shekalim.  They wouldn't plea bargain 5 years instead of 15 years with time off for good behavior. . 

Translated from Duma Whatsapp post Administrator Michael Puah. See original in Hebrew below.

Shameful and Dirty Deal !!
Dear Friends,

 For a long time, you have not been informed of what is happening in the Duma trial. The reason for this is that in recent months there has been a process that we could not report in which a minor deal was offered to the minor in the trial, which was secretly conducted behind the scenes. Tonight we reveal the main points of the deal that will be discussed in court tomorrow.

Let us recall that in the trial, the court rejected all the confessions linking the minor to the deceased. At the same time with regard to Amiram Ben Uliel, the court prepared the confessions and the recovery despite the presence and intervention of Miguel, head of the investigation team, the GSS response.
 Now, during the investigation of the prosecution witnesses, it turns out that Amiram's confession does not hold water. It is inconsistent with reality on the ground and not with the testimonies from the incident.

What to do???

Here comes an amazing initiative in its depravity !!
Proposal for a plea bargain with the minor. The minor, who apparently has indeed become entangled in several other cases, will admit that he planned to carry out a terror attack with someone without mentioning the name Amiram. He would admit that he was a member of a terrorist organization, without mentioning any other members. In return, we will lower the charges for 15 years to five years, and in fact we will remove him almost without punishment because the whole period of detention can be considered part of the punishment.
In this proceeding, the State Attorney's Office continues the line outlined by the court in advance. We'll get the boy out of the story in exchange of Amiram's head. The removal of Amiram's name from the minor's agreed-upon letter of complaint is throwing sand in the eyes. The minor who in internal conversations continues to claim that he is not connected to the story of Duma nor Amiram, can not resist the temptation to leave this story with this proposal which in reality amounts to nothing. The bitter truth is that the State Prosecutor's Office has no evidence or even half an evidence that links Amiram to the event in Duma. The minor's admission of guilt in the plea bargain is the gold on which the entire tower of proof will be built against Amiram.

 No judge will accept Amiram's sweeping denial of any connection to an event,  that it has not been proven it was committed by Jews, and the high probability is that it was carried out in the context of the local arson incitements there, when there is an admission of a Jewish terrorist organization that planned Duma.At the expense of extracting from the minor such nonsense that he has confessed without any connection to Duma, the prosecution will be able to incriminate those who, in our opinion, are innocent and have no evidence against him.

We can not replace the minor and his family in this attempt. Indeed, the fear of seeing your child spend about 15 years in prison can drive everyone crazy.
If the minor was really a partner in the Duma event and he is religious, we would not say anything. But when the clear statement is that the confession is part of a plea bargain that has nothing to do with truth, we believe that the public must know and understand that this is the most despicable conduct imaginable by the State Prosecutor's Office. It is simply a bribe to incriminate an innocent person in exchange for a lighter sentence.
We expect the minor and his family to understand the tremendous damage they are going to do in submission to the State Attorney's Office pressure.

And again in order to be clear whether this is a true confession we are silent and say that the offenders will be punished. But if the confession is only for the purpose of a plea bargain, we expect you not to be swayed by the threats directed against you by the prosecution. Azzur Kach said no to the shameful deal !!


עסקה מלוכלכת ובזויה!! 
חברים וחברות יקרים,

 כבר זמן רב לא עדכנו אתכם מה קורה במשפט דומא. הסיבה לכך היא שבחודשים האחרונים התרחש תהליך שלא יכולנו לדווח עליו במסגרתו הוצעה לקטין במשפט עסקה מלוכלכת, שהתנהלה בחשאי מאחורי הקלעים. הערב אנו חושפים את עקרי העסקה שמחר תידון בבית המשפט.

נזכיר, במשפט הזוטא בית המשפט פסל את כל ההודאות שקושרות את הקטין לדומא. במקביל ביחס לעמירם הכשיר בית המשפט את ההודאות והשחזור על אף הנוכחות וההתערבות של מיגל ראש צוות החקירה, המענה בשב"כ.
 עתה, במהלך חקירת עדי התביעה מתברר שההודאה של עמירם לא מחזיקה מים. היא לא מתיישבת עם המציאות בשטח ולא עם העדויות מהאירוע. 

מה עושים??? 

כאן באה יוזמה מדהימה בשפלותה !!
הצעה לעסקת טיעון עם הקטין. הקטין שכפי הנראה אכן הסתבך בכמה פרשות אחרות, יודה שהוא תכנן לעשות פיגוע בדומא עם מישהו בלי להזכיר את השם המפורש 'עמירם'. הוא יודה שהיה חבר בארגון טרור בלי להזכיר כמובן אף חבר אחר. בתמורה נוריד את הטענות לעונש מ-15 שנה לחמש שנים ובעצם נוציא אותו כמעט בלי עונש כי אפשר להחשיב את כל תקופת המעצר כחלק מהעונש. 
בהליך זה ממשיכה הפרקליטות את הקו שהתווה בית המשפט מראש. נוציא את הקטין מהסיפור תמורת ראשו של עמירם. הוצאת שמו של עמירם מכתב התביעה המוסכם של הקטין היא זריית חול בעיניים. הקטין שבשיחות פנימיות ממשיך לטעון שהוא לא קשור לסיפור דומא ולעמירם, לא מסוגל לעמוד מול הפיתוי לצאת מהסיפור בהצעה זו שלכאורה אין בה דבר. אבל האמת המרה היא שלפרקליטות אין ראייה וחצי ראייה הקושרת את עמירם לאירוע בדומא. הודאתו של הקטין במסגרת עסקת הטיעון היא ראיית הזהב שעליה ייבנה כל מגדל ההוכחות כנגד עמירם. שום שופט לא יקבל את ההכחשה הגורפת של עמירם לגבי כל קשר לאירוע שאין הוכחה שנעשה על ידי יהודים, והסבירות הגבוהה היא שנעשה במסגרת קרב ההצתות במקום, כאשר   יש הודאה בקיום ארגון טרור שתכנן את דומא. במחיר הוצאת הקטין מהשטויות שהוא עשה בלי קשר לדומא, תרוויח הפרקליטות הרשעה למי שלדעתנו חף מפשע, ואין לה שום ראיה נגדו.  

איננו יכולים להיכנס במקומו של הקטין ומשפחתו בניסיון זה. אכן החשש לראות את ילדך מבלה כ-15 שנים בכלא יכול להטריף כל אחד. 
לו הקטין היה באמת שותף באירוע דומא והוא חוזר בתשובה לא היינו  אומרים דבר. אבל כשהאמירה הברורה היא שההודאה היא במסגרת עסקת טיעון שאין בה לבין האמת כלום, אנו סבורים שהציבור חייב לדעת ולהבין שמדובר בהתנהלות הכי בזוייה שניתן להעלות על הדעת על ידיי הפרקליטות. זו פשוט הצעת שוחד להפליל בן אדם חף מפשע תמורת הקלה בעונש. 
אנו מצפים מהקטין ומשפחתו להבין את הנזק העצום שהם הולכים לעשות בכניעה ללחץ הפרקליטות. 

ועוד פעם כדי להיות ברורים אם מדובר בהודאה אמתית אנחנו שותקים ואומרים העבריינים יענשו. אך אם מדובר בהודאה רק לצורך הסכם טיעון אנו מצפים מכם שלא תכנעו לסחיטה באיומים שמנהלת הפרקליטות כנגדכם. אזרו כח אמרו לא לעסקה המבישה!!


Report: Arrangement with defendant in Duma affair
According to TV report, minor accused of involvement in Dawabshe murder will confess to planning the murder but convicted of lesser offense.