Anti Trump cartoons. Retired FBI agent blasts Comey

Bsd

Most cartoons are very telling but viewer discretion advised.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <lenmar89@aol.com>
Date: Nov 7, 2016 8:49 AM
Subject:
To:
Cc:

 

 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ᐧ

*****************************

Don't miss reading this very well crafted letter---and pass it on.

  Well done letter to FBI director Comey.  What sticks in mind is that the law didn't require "intent" all she had to do was do it; she did it and nothing is happening to her or her staff.

 

          October 2, 2016

Mr. James Comey, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation

J. Edgar Hoover Building

935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

 

Sir, I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court. However, you personally re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as "extremely careless" in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job.

 

As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions, which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be silent.

 

Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her. Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have set a precedent that can never be rectified and certainly not justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world. for entirely political reasons.

 

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation. NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU

(unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S. but, instead, personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself. Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence , or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling? What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?

 

Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents) took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased manner regardless of the subject's position or standing in the community. All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir, decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization. This is a RICO case if there ever was one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business. It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted. You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

 

I will conclude with this: Following my retirement from the FBI, I volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations. For most of that year I operated outside the wire patrolling with the troops, interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the bad guys. The results of my work would then be reported through secure channels to the Commanding Officer. All reports and communications were required to be transmitted via secure and encrypted devices. Occasionally my remote location in the mountains of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the battle space. It would have been convenient if I could have just called the Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal laptop. But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to Secretary of State communications, low level classifications of Secret. Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so. That is how serious this violation is considered.

 

Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO activities and is running for President of the United States, the most powerful position in the world. You have trampled on the Rule of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and in unbiased enforcement of the law. How do you sleep at night? It is time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.

  Sincerely,

 

Hugh W. Galyean

(FBI Agent, Retired)

*****************************************

 

 

 

Fwd: The Clinton Foundation is still under scrutiny another Gem by Mike Huckabee

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mike Huckabee" <newsletter@mikehuckabee.com>
Date: Nov 7, 2016 8:42 AM
Subject: The Clinton Foundation is still under scrutiny
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>
Cc:

The message you have just received was delivered by Mike Huckabee and includes a message from Huck PAC, his political action committee.  Robin, The news media and Democratic Party operatives (but I repeat myself) are trumpeting James Comey's latest 180 as having "exonerated" Hillary Clinton. No, it hasn't. Even if you swallow the idea that mountains more evidence of lawbreaking and deliberate obstruction don't bolster the case against her, that's just the emails. The Clinton Foundation is still under scrutiny, and if Comey can't find anything fishy there, then he'll have a worse track record than a blind pig hunting for acorns. If the FBI is looking for a place to start, somebody already did it for them. WikiLeaks revealed that a lawyer wrote a report back in 2008, blasting the Foundation for operating more like a political organization than a charity. Her 19-page report criticized the Clinton Foundation for everything from its substandard sexual harassment policies (there's a surprise!) to intertwining charity business and the business of Bill Clinton, creating confusion "at virtually every level." At that point, it had already been operating for 10 years. The attorney demanded that reforms be made immediately to bring it into compliance with rules and laws governing non-profit charitable institutions. Needless to say, eight years later, none of those reforms have been instituted, and the lies, corruption and rule-breaking have only gotten worse. But then, you could say that about any institution that's entrusted to the Clintons for eight years. So why would anyone do that? Sincerely, Mike Huckabee ------ Message from Huck PAC:   HUCK PAC NEEDS FINANCIAL HELP: Chip in to help support Huck PAC endorsed candidates such as Tim Scott, Marco Rubio and Trent Franks. We rely on small donations from supporters to help fund our efforts, not big money donors from Wall Street . CONTRIBUTE HERE

And in case you missed these:   Vote Trump By Mike Huckabee Despite what we've learned from WikiLeaks (that Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified documents was as well-known and worrisome to her own staff as the beyond-shady Clinton Foundation was; that it was even more egregious and damaging than we imagined; and that a concerted effort was undertaken to hide it, which clears the unnecessary bar of proving "intent" to deceive investigators)… And despite the impossibility of reviewing over 650,000 emails in one week… And despite the fact that we now know that at least five foreign intelligence agencies likely hacked into Hillary's server, and that Hillary allowed even her foreign-born maid access to classified information and to go into a room forbidden to all but those with the highest security clearances… And despite Comey's earlier claim that no prosecutor would pursue this case being blown to bits by many prosecutors such as Rudy Giuliani, who would have gladly gone to court with what they had in July, much less the mountain of new evidence that's emerged since… FBI Director James Comey has once again yanked the football away from his outraged and dedicated law enforcement agents, and doubled down on his staggering "never mind, nothing to see here" claim from July. If Mr. Comey has even a speck of the integrity we were led to believe that he possesses, then the only explanation I can think of is that he realized the Obama Justice Department, which has been rotted away from within by corruption and partisanship, was going to block every attempt to enforce the rule of law against Hillary Clinton. If it is true that the NYPD has devastating information taken from Anthony Weiner's computer and was threatening to make it public if Washington failed to act, then maybe this is Comey's way of flipping the fail-safe switch to signal state level authorities that the feds refuse to do their duty, so they have to take over. If not, then the only explanation I can see for Comey's decision not to pursue Hillary Clinton is that the foundational American principles of equal justice and the rule of law are dead. In that case, there is only one way to revive them. When the system is irreparably broken by the people who were put in charge of it, the last line of defense is the voters. We Americans have to do the job of replacing those who have corrupted and destroyed our system of equal justice ourselves. We now know that if we don't drain the swamp, no one else will. My fellow Americans: turn out in record numbers Tuesday. Stand in line all day in the rain if you have to. Cast so many votes that any attempts at fraud and rigging can't overcome them. Do not reward unbridled lawlessness and corruption with a promotion to the most powerful office on Earth. Do your duty to save this great nation and the rights and freedoms its Founders bequeathed to us for yourself, your children and your grandchildren. Vote for Trump and throw the bums out.

Trump Rally Scare By Mike Huckabee By now, you've probably seen the frightening footage of Donald Trump being hustled off stage in Reno by the Secret Service when someone in the audience who was thought to have a weapon rushed the stage. He's fine, and it turned out the man was not armed. I just wanted to share a few observations: I've been on the campaign trail with Donald, and I've been amazed at his energy and stamina. He can do one rally after another until aides forty years younger than him are exhausted, but he keeps going strong. He loves being among his supporters. I know that after a scary incident like that, the Secret Service would never advise him to return to the stage, but he did, just five minutes later. It showed amazing courage. Trump also showed a lot of class in thanking the Secret Service, local law enforcement officers and his supporters, who spotted the threatening spectator and dived on him. Trump supporters proved that they have his back the way he's promising to have theirs. I also know from experience that his Secret Service detail and the cops working his rallies like and respect Trump because he shows tremendous gratitude and respect for him. There are some presidential candidates I could name who talk a lot about respect but show very little of it to their Secret Service people. But I won't name her. I'm glad Donald Trump is safe and sound. I hope that the shocking footage of the scare will make the people who've been using violent rhetoric over political differences reassess what they've let their overheated passions do to them. And I hope it will make voters think very hard before they fill out their ballots on Tuesday. Do you really want your children to grow up in a nation run by those who would resort to brute strength - whether personal or government - to silence non-politically-correct speech? And whose devotion to tolerance extends only to tolerating those who think exactly the way they do? ------ Message from Huck PAC:   HUCK PAC NEEDS FINANCIAL HELP: Chip in to help support Huck PAC endorsed candidates such as Tim Scott, Marco Rubio and Trent Franks. We rely on small donations from supporters to help fund our efforts, not big money donors from Wall Street . We urgently need your financial support so please respond today! CONTRIBUTE HERE

Home | Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe

Very Strong Letter to Orthodox Jews by Linda Cohn if They Vote for Hillary or a Write In Candidate.

bs"d

My comments:  First let me preface by saying that this letter is not easy reading.  It is accusatory and does not put us Orthodox Jews in a positive light.  Calling us "prostitutes" is not exactly complementary. 

So why would I put such a strong accusatory letter on my blog?

Perhaps because I have been listening some of Alon Anava's videos on youtube. Please google him. Here is one video clip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee3UTF4pOlE I recommend them highly and they have changed my entire outlook about things.  Alon Anava experience a NDE, Near Death Experience. His youtubes are fascinating and I am convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt authentic. He could not have made it up.  As for me, so many truths that I had second guessed, thinking....perhaps my perceptions were off, perhaps others know more than I, ....were in fact strengthened.  

Listening to him makes one really understand that up in heaven we can not hide behind the truth.  We will be judged according to what is the truth and we will not be able to hide.  Our deepest suffering will come from understanding the long reaching consequences of our actions and we will be terribly embarrassed by our choices because we disappointed G-d, we disappointed our fellow Jews and we disappointed G-d's great expectation of us.  No words were able to describe the deep emotional pain our Neshomas experience in a heavenly court when the ramifications of our deeds are shown in a blinding light and we realize that we messed up.  

He explained that any suffering in this world is so much more worth any suffering in the world to come.  Better we correct our sins now then later in spite of our temporary discomfort or embarrassment.  The tremendous spiritual pleasures we can earn in the world to come is also not comparable to anything down on this earth.  

Rabbosai.... We have 2 days to see and share the truth.  We have 2 days to put our vote for Judea and Samaria and our rights to settle all of Eretz Yisroel our Biblical Homeland, for Jerusalem and for the Torah which is consistent with the platform of the Republican party.

Or we can vote for the party that is intimate with the Muslim Brotherhood, with a candidate and party that funded ISIS and made ISIS great and powerful.  with a Candidate that has empowered a nuclear Iran. With a candidate who speaks of rights for women and children and means Planned parenthood and Population control via abortion and any other means. 

Our Sages say that in the Desert the women refused to give of their Jewelry to the Golden Calf.  I see Linda Cohn from the Levite tribe acting as did her ancestors, full of pain, watching the men, leaders in the desert prostituting to the Golden calf .  She is begging the Rabbinic Leaders not to follow in the footsteps of the Miraglim, the Spies who spoke poorly of our precious Land.

If she wakes up our generation, she will have done the greatest eternal kindness to any man or Rabbi she might have offended.  Robin

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To the orthodox Jews who would vote for Hillary, Chaya M. or any third
party candidate:  

Are you going to prostrate yourselves on the altar
of Mammon/money and forget Jerusalem one more time?  

That's what you did when you voted for Obama twice.  Don't pretend otherwise.  Don't
pretend Hillary will be different.  You are putting your social
welfare benefits (i.e. money) above the safety and security of Israel
and the lives of its citizens.

There is no comparison between the support Israel will get from Trump
vs. the grief it will get from Hillary.

Hillary who
•       as Secretary of State harangued Netanyahu for 45 minutes at 3 am in
the morning because Joe Biden was furious that while he was visiting
Israel, Israel approved building new apartments in north Jerusalem,

•       chooses as her closest advisor and friend, Huma Abedin, whose family
has been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.  (Huma Abedin's mother sits
on the Presidency Staff Council of the International Islamic Council
for Da'wa and Relief, a group that is chaired by the leader of the
Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. and she founded an aid
organization called the International Islamic Committee for Woman and
Child, which at one point was said to be affiliated with International
Islamic Council for Da'wa and Relief. IICDR was banned in Israel years
later for allegedly supporting Hamas, a Palestinian offshoot of the
Muslim Brotherhood, under the auspices of yet another group, the Union
of Good. The Union of Good was designated by Treasury in 2008 for
aiding a terrorist organization.

•       .again shows her propensities by hugging Arafat's wife, Suha, after
Arafat claimed Israel was poisoning Palestinian children,

•       supported the overthrow of Mubarek and the ascension to power of the
Muslim Brotherhood,

•       supports the Iran agreement which paves the way for Iran to acquire
nuclear weapons.

•       is $25 million in debt to Saudia Arabia for their contributions to
the Clinton Foundation

Trump, on the other hand is supported by known friends of Israel
including Rudy Guilianni, Mike Huckabee, and his orthodox Jewish
son-in-law, Jared Kushner.  Trump opposed the Iran agreement, the Iraq
war, and the Republican Party platform calls for moving the US Embassy
to Jerusalem.  (We've heard that before, but the Democrats aren't even
citing that as a goal.)

The fact  that I have to spend my time explaining that Trump has
Israel's back, while Hillary supports Arab regimes bent on Israel's
destruction to you - 

You who pray three times a day facing Jerusalem,

You who pray three times a day for the peace of Jerusalem -  is
absolutely abominable. 

Give me a break, you are making excuses to sell Jerusalem out for money.

Do not forget Jerusalem; do not forsake Jerusalem.  

What happens to the Jews of Israel will happen to you next - beyond a shadow of a
doubt. The Jews of New York and Florida alone can go a long way
towards electing Trump.  

Choose between prostituting yourselves for money/welfare benefits or Jerusalem. 

 

The choice is yours.

Related Posts:

Friday, November 04, 2016

In Response to Rabbi Billet's endorsement of Hillary Giving her Higher Grades Than Trump when it comes to the treatment of women. Rabbi Algaze's response to the Rabbi's.....

http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2016/11/fwd-for-rabbi-billet-in-response-to.html

Related Posts:

Rabbi Shmuel Kamenetsky When Asked, Says That He is Voting for Trump.... "A man is known by the company he keeps" Aesop

http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2016/11/rabbi-shmuel-kamenetsky-when-asked-he.html

Sunday, November 06, 2016

ON THIS ELECTION AND THE ORTHODOX RABBIS' RESPONSE (to Rabbi Kenneth Hain and Rabbi Hershel Billet endorsement of Hillary) by Rabbi David Algaze 

 http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2016/11/on-this-election-and-orthodox-rabbis.html

Monday, November 07, 2016

Julian Assange's Most Incendiary Interview: "Hillary Clinton Is The Central Cog Of The Establishment" - Tyler Durden . Comments. Today's news Pardoning Felons to rig the Election

http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2016/11/julian-assanges-most-incendiary.html

--

Sincerely,

Robin Ticker

Israel Advocacy Calendar (www.IsraelAdvocacyCalendar.com).

Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan) and Howard Chaim Grief great activists and lovers of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichronum Baruch.  May their memories serve as a blessing. 

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Julian Assange's Most Incendiary Interview: "Hillary Clinton Is The Central Cog Of The Establishment" - Tyler Durden . Comments. Today's news Pardoning Felons to rig the Election

Bsd

My comments.  Why did the FBI declare that there is no criminal evidence against Hillary after they received 650,000 emails and barely had any time to examine them?  Can they honestly examine all these emails in just a few days and conclusively say she is clear. No one actually believes this is the case. But they want to clear her name so the election can proceed.  So there is good reason to expect that indeed the FBI will at a future date find reason to indict her based on some conclusive disclosure of wrongdoing possibly coming from the New York Police who probably have a backup of Wiener's laptop with conclusive evidence.
The problem is that if the Democrats win now, then another politician of similar caliber will be taking over.
There seems to be a pattern as to how the Democrats operate.  Here is a similar story of 2015  and we can learn how this scandal is hoping to unfold from the establishment. 

Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber resigns amid criminal investigation, growing scandal.  http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/02/gov_john_kitzhaber_resigns_ami.html Secretary of State Kate Brown, a fellow Democrat,  succeeded Kitzhaber

. 

In 2015, in Oregon there was a Democratic politician elected when he was under criminal investigation. He won but was encouraged to resign.  I checked the internet and do not see that there was a criminal investigation or any conviction following his resignation.  Probably he agreed to step down in return for no criminal investigation. Probably the justification was that doing so would ensure a peaceful transition...
.
If this happens with Clinton what do we gain?  The same corrupt and treasonous Democratic Party run gov't , with a substitute Cog that will continue Obama's and the Clinton's legacy that has literally endangered the world !!! See Assange interview below!

digression....back to Bill Clinton days.  if that isn't enough here is some additional evidence from the past, that the Clinton's are committed to reducing world population ("Possibly one of the most heinous of Bill Clinton’s foreign policies dealt with population control."   http://www.clintonmemoriallibrary.com/policies/population-control/)A Special Report EIR (Executive Intelligence Review) March 10, 1981, reported a Club of Rome planning apparatus operating outside the control of the White House whose sole purpose is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. By the way they will blame it all on the Jews especially Rothschild https://nwoobserver.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/a-rothschild-plan-for-world-government/ The Clinton administration nearly doubled U.S. spending on world population control programs (from about $300 million in 1992 to $585 million in 1995) and, in keeping with the United Nations action plan, sought to double population control spending again in the next five years (up to $1.2 billion for fiscal year 2000). The stated goal of the action plan is to provide birth control and family planning services by the end of the decade to all 600 million women of childbearing age in developing countries....Bill Clinton promised to make abortions “safe, legal and rare,” so why did he promote abortion across America and around the world? Abortion is now the most widely practiced form of birth control in the world and is legal in 172 countries.There were approximately 50 million abortions in the world in 1994.. This is the Clinton's idea of women's rights and Health Care... The real initiators of Obama’s GHI (Global Health Initiative) are Bill Gates, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, David Rockefeller, the World Economic Forum, the Clinton Global Initiative, the United Nations Foundation, and the International Planned Parenthood Federation.  (thank you Linda Cohn for the tips)

going back to our original discussion about Hillary winning the election and resigning due to criminal evidence...The VP, Caine in this case, in turn will probably use his Presidential pardon to let the Clinton's off with a minor slap on the wrist if that at all! Dejas vu...

Now here is another example of today's news of convenient pardons of felons for the sake of rigging an election. Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe has granted voting rights to as many as 60,000 convicted felons just in time for them to register to vote, nearly five times more than previously reported and enough to win the state for his long-time friend, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.   http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/06/exclusive-virginia-gov-pardons-60000-felons-enough-to-swing-election/

------------------------------

Julian Assange: Saudi Arabia and Qatar Funding Clinton Foundation And Isis, Podesta Says 'Shut Up http://www.inquisitr.com/3686367/julian-assange-saudi-arabia-and-qatar-funding-clinton-foundation-and-isis/

Read this interview in its entirety if you can.  See below. Here is a small excerpt. Jon Pilger (JP) is interviewing Julian Assange (JA) at the Equador Embassy in London where he is seeking refuge.......

...JP: The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation while Hilary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia.

JA: Under Hillary Clinton, the world's largest ever arms deal was made with Saudi Arabia, [worth] more than $80 billion.  In fact, during her tenure as Secretary of State, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value, doubled.

JP: Of course the consequence of that is that the notorious terrorist group called ISIl or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation.

JA: Yes.

JP:That's extraordinary.

My comments.

Hillary, Secy of State operates on quid pro quo.

Clinton Foundation gets $12 million from Morocco

Clinton Foundation gets $1-5 million from Qatar

Clinton Foundation gets between $10-$25 million from Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia gets 80billion arms deal and helps to arm terror groups including Isil.
Hillary Clinton was directly responsible for the overthrow of Qaddafi that led to Isis  moving in,  and the migrant crisis.
Even if Clinton herself is elected, and then she is found guilty and indicted then she can be encouraged to step down and another puppet of this corrupt establishment takes her place with no real upset to the establishment apple cart. 

http://israelagainstterror.blogspot.com/2016/11/julian-assanges-most-incendiary.html?m=1

Monday, November 7, 2016

Julian Assange's Most Incendiary Interview: "Hillary Clinton Is The Central Cog Of The Establishment" - Tyler Durden

by Tyler Durden

Hat tip: Dr. Jean-Charles Bensoussan 

She's the centraliser that inter-connects all these different cogs.  She's the smooth central representation of all that, and 'all that' is more or less what is in power now in the United States. It's what we call the establishment or the DC consensus.

In what may be his most provocative and incendiary interview ever given, Wikileaks founder and whistleblower Julian Assange - who realizes that if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency his prospects turn even more bleak - spoke to Australian journalist and documentary maker John Pilger, and summaraized what he has gleaned from the tens of thousands of Clinton emails released by WikiLeaks this year in the following interview courtesy of RT and Dartmouth films. 

John Pilger, another Australian émigré, conducted the 25-minute interview at the Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has been trapped since 2012 for fear of extradition to the US. Last month, Assange had his internet access cut off for alleged "interference" in the American presidential election through the work of his website. 

Full interview transcript below:



'Clinton made FBI look weak, now there is anger' 

John Pilger: What's the significance of the FBI's intervention in these last days of the U.S. election campaign, in the case against Hillary Clinton? 

Julian Assange: If you look at the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America's political police. The FBI demonstrated this by taking down the former head of the CIA [General David Petraeus] over classified information given to his mistress. Almost no-one is untouchable.  The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that no-one can resist us.  But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI's investigation, so there's anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.  We've published about 33,000 of Clinton's emails when she was Secretary of State.  They come from a batch of just over 60,000 emails, [of which] Clinton has kept about half – 30,000 -- to herself, and we've published about half.
Then there are the Podesta emails we've been publishing.  [John] Podesta is Hillary Clinton's primary campaign manager, so there's a thread that runs through all these emails; there are quite a lot of pay-for-play, as they call it, giving access in exchange for money to states, individuals and corporations. [These emails are] combined with the cover up of the Hillary Clinton emails when she was Secretary of State, [which] has led to an environment where the pressure on the FBI increases. 

* * * 
'Russian government not the source of Clinton leaks'

JP: The Clinton campaign has said that Russia is behind all of this, that Russia has manipulated the campaign and is the source for WikiLeaks and its emails. 

JA: The Clinton camp has been able to project that kind of neo-McCarthy hysteria: that Russia is responsible for everything.  Hilary Clinton stated multiple times, falsely, that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That is false; we can say that the Russian government is not the source. 

WikiLeaks has been publishing for ten years, and in those ten years, we have published ten million documents, several thousand individual publications, several thousand different sources, and we have never got it wrong. 

* * * 

'Saudi Arabia & Qatar funding ISIS and Clinton'

JP: The emails that give evidence of access for money and how Hillary Clinton herself benefited from this and how she is benefitting politically, are quite extraordinary. I'm thinking of  when the Qatari representative was given five minutes with Bill Clinton for a million dollar cheque.

JA: And twelve million dollars from Morocco …

JP: Twelve million from Morocco yeah.

JA: For Hillary Clinton to attend [a party].

JP: In terms of the foreign policy of the United States, that's where the emails are most revealing, where they show the direct connection between Hillary Clinton and the foundation of jihadism, of ISIL, in the Middle East.  Can you talk about how the emails demonstrate the connection between those who are meant to be fighting the jihadists of ISIL, are actually those who have helped create it.

JA: There's an early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, not so long after she left the State Department, to her campaign manager John Podesta that states ISIL is funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar.  Now this is the most significant email in the whole collection, and perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the Clinton Foundation.  Even the U.S. government agrees that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIL, or ISIS. But the dodge has always been that, well it's just some rogue Princes, using their cut of the oil money to do whatever they like, but actually the government disapproves.
But that email says that no, it is the governments of Saudi and  Qatar that have been funding ISIS.

JP: The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation while Hilary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia.

JA: Under Hillary Clinton, the world's largest ever arms deal was made with Saudi Arabia, [worth] more than $80 billion.  In fact, during her tenure as Secretary of State, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value, doubled.

JP: Of course the consequence of that is that the notorious terrorist group called ISIl or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation.

JA: Yes.

JP:That's extraordinary. 

* * * 

'Clinton has been eaten alive by her ambition'

JA: I actually feel quite sorry for Hillary Clinton as a person because I see someone who is eaten alive by their ambitions,  tormented literally to the point where they become sick; they faint as a result of [the reaction] to their ambitions. She represents a whole network of people and a network of relationships with particular states.  The question is how does Hilary Clinton fit in this broader network?  She's a centralising cog. You've got a lot of different gears in operation from the big banks like Goldman Sachs and major elements of Wall Street, and Intelligence and people in the State Department and the Saudis.

She's the centraliser that inter-connects all these different cogs.  She's the smooth central representation of all that, and 'all that' is more or less what is in power now in the United States. It's what we call the establishment or the DC consensus. One of the more significant Podesta emails that we released was about how the Obama cabinet was formed and how half the Obama cabinet was basically nominated by a representative from Citi Bank. This is quite amazing. 

JP: Didn't Citibank supply a list …. ?

JA: Yes.


JP: … which turned out to be most of the Obama cabinet.

JA: Yes.



JP: So Wall Street decides the cabinet of the President of the United States?

JA: If you were following the Obama campaign back then, closely, you could see it had become very close to banking interests. So I think you can't properly understand Hillary Clinton's foreign policy without understanding Saudi Arabia.  The connections with Saudi Arabia are so intimate.

* * * 

'Libya is Hillary Clinton's war'

JP: Why was she so demonstrably enthusiastic about the destruction of Libya? Can you talk a little about just what the emails have told us – told you – about what happened there? Because Libya is such a source for so much of the mayhem now in Syria: the ISIL, jihadism, and so on. And it was almost Hillary Clinton's invasion. What do the emails tell us about that?

JA: Libya, more than anyone else's war, was Hillary Clinton's war. Barak Obama initially opposed it. Who was the person championing it?  Hillary Clinton.  That's documented throughout her emails. She had put her favoured agent, Sidney Blumenthal, on to that; there's more than 1700 emails out of the thirty three thousand Hillary Clinton emails that we've published, just about Libya. It's not that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state -- something that she would use in her run-up to the general election for President. 

So in late 2011 there is an internal document called the Libya Tick Tock that was produced for Hillary Clinton, and it's the chronological description of how she was the central figure in the destruction of the Libyan state, which resulted in around 40,000 deaths within Libya; jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in, leading to the European refugee and migrant crisis.

Not only did you have people fleeing Libya, people fleeing Syria, the destabilisation of other African countries as a result of arms flows, but the Libyan state itself err was no longer able to control the movement of people through it. Libya faces along to the Mediterranean and had been effectively the cork in the bottle of Africa. So all problems, economic problems and civil war in Africa -- previously people fleeing those problems didn't end up in Europe because Libya policed the Mediterranean. That was said explicitly at the time, back in early 2011 by Gaddafi:  'What do these Europeans think they're doing, trying to bomb and destroy the Libyan State? There's going to be floods of migrants out of Africa and jihadists into Europe, and this is exactly what happened.

* * * 

'Trump won't be permitted to win'

JP: You get complaints from people saying, 'What is WikiLeaks doing?  Are they trying to put Trump in the Whitehouse?'

JA: My answer is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that?  Because he's had every establishment off side; Trump doesn't have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment, but banks, intelligence [agencies], arms companies... big foreign money … are all united behind Hillary Clinton, and the media as well, media owners and even journalists themselves.

JP: There is the accusation that WikiLeaks is in league with the Russians. Some people say, 'Well, why doesn't WikiLeaks investigate and publish emails on Russia?'

JA: We have published about 800,000 documents of various kinds that relate to Russia. Most of those are critical; and a great many books have come out of our publications about Russia, most of which are critical. Our [Russia]documents have gone on to be used in quite a number of court cases: refugee cases of people fleeing some kind of claimed political persecution in Russia, which they use our documents to back up.



JP: Do you yourself take a view of the U.S. election?  Do you have a preference for Clinton or Trump?

JA: [Let's talk about] Donald Trump. What does he represent in the American mind and in the European mind?  He represents American white trash, [which Hillary Clinton called] 'deplorable and irredeemable'.  It means from an establishment or educated cosmopolitan, urbane perspective, these people are like the red necks, and you can never deal with them.  Because he so clearly -- through his words and actions and the type of people that turn up at his rallies -- represents people who are not the middle, not the upper middle educated class, there is a fear of seeming to be associated in any way with them, a social fear that lowers the class status of anyone who can be accused of somehow assisting Trump in any way, including any criticism of Hillary Clinton. If you look at how the middle class gains its economic and social power, that makes absolute sense.

* * * 

'US attempting to squeeze WikiLeaks through my refugee status'

JP: I'd like to talk about Ecuador, the small country that has given you refuge and [political asylum] in this embassy in London.  Now Ecuador has cut off the internet from here where we're doing this interview, in the Embassy, for the clearly obvious reason that they are concerned about appearing to intervene in the U.S. election campaign.  Can you talk about why they would take that action and your own views on Ecuador's support for you?

JA: Let's let go back four years.  I made an asylum application to Ecuador in this embassy, because of the U.S. extradition case, and the result was that after a month, I was successful in my asylum application. The embassy since then has been surrounded by police: quite an expensive police operation which the British government admits to spending more than £12.6 million. They admitted that over a year ago.  Now there's undercover police and there are robot surveillance cameras of various kinds -- so that there has been quite a serious conflict right here in the heart of London between Ecuador, a country of sixteen million people, and the United Kingdom, and the Americans who have been helping on the side.  So that was a brave and principled thing for Ecuador to do. Now we have the U.S. election [campaign], the Ecuadorian election is in February next year, and you have the White House feeling the political heat as a result of the true information that we have been publishing. 

WikiLeaks does not publish from the jurisdiction of Ecuador, from this embassy or in the territory of Ecuador; we publish from France, we publish from, from Germany, we publish from The Netherlands and from a number of other countries, so that the attempted squeeze on WikiLeaks is through my refugee status; and this is, this is really intolerable. [It means] that [they] are trying to get at a publishing organisation; [they] try and prevent it from publishing true information that is of intense interest to the American people and others about an election.

JP: Tell us what would happen if you walked out of this embassy.

JA: I would be immediately arrested by the British police and I would then be extradited either immediately to the United States or to Sweden. In Sweden I am not charged, I have already been previously cleared [by the Senior Stockholm Prosecutor Eva Finne]. We were not certain exactly what would happen there, but then we know that the Swedish government has refused to say that they will not extradite me to the United States we know they have extradited 100 per cent of people whom the U.S. has requested since at least 2000.  So over the last fifteen years, every single person the U.S. has tried to extradite from Sweden has been extradited, and they refuse to provide a guarantee [that won't happen].

JP: People often ask me how you cope with the isolation in here. 

JA: Look, one of the best attributes of human beings is that they're adaptable; one of the worst attributes of human beings is they are adaptable.  They adapt and start to tolerate abuses, they adapt to being involved themselves in abuses, they adapt to adversity and they continue on. So in my situation, frankly, I'm a bit institutionalised -- this [the embassy] is the world .. it's visually the world [for me].


JP: It's the world without sunlight, for one thing, isn't it?

JA: It's the world without sunlight, but I haven't seen sunlight in so long, I don't remember it.

JP: Yes.

JA: So , yes, you adapt.  The one real irritant is that my young children -- they also adapt. They adapt to being without their father. That's a hard, hard adaption which they didn't ask for.



JP: Do you worry about them?

JA: Yes, I worry about them; I worry about their mother.
  
* * * 

'I am innocent and in arbitrary detention'

JP: Some people would say, 'Well, why don't you end it and simply walk out the door and allow yourself to be extradited to Sweden?'

JA: The U.N. [the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention] has looked into this whole situation. They spent eighteen months in formal, adversarial litigation. [So it's] me and the U.N. verses Sweden and the U.K.  Who's right?  The U.N. made a conclusion that I am being arbitrarily detained illegally, deprived of my freedom and that what has occurred has not occurred within the laws that the United Kingdom and Sweden, and that [those countries] must obey. It is an illegal abuse.  It is the United Nations formally asking, 'What's going on here?  What is your legal explanation for this? [Assange] says that you should recognise his asylum.' [And here is]

Sweden formally writing back to the United Nations to say, 'No, we're not going to [recognise the UN ruling], so leaving open their ability to extradite. 

I just find it absolutely amazing that the narrative about this situation is not put out publically in the press, because it doesn't suit the Western establishment narrative -- that yes, the West has political prisoners, it's a reality, it's not just me, there's a bunch of other people as well.  The West has political prisoners. Of course, no state accepts [that it should call] the people it is imprisoning or detaining for political reasons, political prisoners. They don't call them political prisoners in China, they don't call them political prisoners in Azerbaijan and they don't call them political prisoners in the United States, U.K. or Sweden; it is absolutely intolerable to have that kind of self-perception. 

JA: Here we have a case, the Swedish case, where I have never been charged with a crime, where I have already been cleared [by the Stockholm prosecutor] and found to be innocent, where the woman herself said that the police made it up, where the United Nations formally said the whole thing is illegal, where the State of Ecuador also investigated and found that I should be given asylum.  Those are the facts, but what is the rhetoric?  

JP: Yes, it's different.

JA: The rhetoric is pretending, constantly pretending that I have been charged with a crime, and never mentioning that I have been already previously cleared, never mentioning that the woman herself says that the police made it up. 

[The rhetoric] is trying to avoid [the truth that ] the U.N. formally found that the whole thing is illegal, never even mentioning that Ecuador made a formal assessment through its formal processes and found that yes, I am subject to persecution by the United States.

Tyler Durden

Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-05/julian-assanges-most-incendiary-interview-hillary-clinton-central-cog-establishment 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.