Thursday, December 28, 2017
Re: Asara B'Tevet. What the Chatham Sofer wrote.
Wednesday, December 27, 2017
Asara B'Tevet עריכת נר לבן ישי משיחך and Preparation of a Lamp for the son of Yishai Your Annointed One Speedily in our days
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/102698/jewish/Asarah-BTevet-Tevet-10.htmOn Asarah B'Tevet, the 10th day of the Jewish month of Tevet, in the year 3336 from Creation (425 BCE), the armies of the Babylonian emperor Nebuchadnezzar laid siege to Jerusalem. Thirty months later—on 9 Tammuz 3338—the city walls were breached, and on 9 Av of that year the Holy Temple was destroyed. The Jewish people were exiled to Babylonia for 70 years.
Israeli Interior Minister Aryeh Deri and Sephardic Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef were among the people who attended the funeral.
"When the Temple existed the public would bring sacrifices, but the public paid for these sacrifices and some were made for their people," said Deri, according to Ynetnews. "For our sins, when there is no Temple, God takes pure souls as a public sacrifice. … There are no words that can console the family. God chose you to make a public sacrifice. We don't understand the ways of the Almighty."
Analysis of Rabbi Sorotzkin Teshuva - Tikun of ending the Golus - yearn for recognition of G-d's Kingdom, yearn for Davidic Kingdom and yearn for return of Temple Service a Drasha given following Har Nof Massacre
Even the students of Rabbi Akiva had this trait. We all are guilty to some degree. That is why we fast...to do Cheshbon Nefesh. take responsibility, to be honest and true to ourselves, Do we really deserve to get the Beit Hamikdash?
- Let us openly declare and proclaim with Unity, the Covenant that G-d made to our forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob that the Land of Israel is our Eternal Inheritance
- DOCUMENTATION AND BIBLICAL REFERENCES: Defending the Covenant! Israel is the Promised Land to the Nation of Israel EXCLUSIVELY. https://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2017/06/documentation-and-references-israel-is.html
- Declaring that the 2 State Solution, what is known as the Peace Process is null and void and not viable and can never bring Peace.
- Return the Judges as of Days of Old.
US envoy: Stop calling Judea and Samaria 'occupied' December 27, 2017https://worldisraelnews.com/us-envoy-stop-calling-judea- samaria-occupied/
- Watch Hakafot Shniyot in T.A. שמחה לארצך, ובנה, ולירושלים עירך - מועדון הבארבי 2015 ת"א https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdRm2Iyd3gg
- "שמחה לארצך וששון לעירך הקפות שניות הר המור התשע''ח Watch! https://youtu.be/FQXmeXwTJyo
- Simcha Leartzecha Part II שמחה לארצך חלק ב https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs4F_kr-LgY
נרות חנוכה, דוד המלך ובית המקדש
Robin Ticker
Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.
US envoy, US Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman to State Dept. : Stop calling Judea and Samaria ‘occupied’
Robin Ticker
Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com
Tuesday, December 26, 2017
Monday, December 25, 2017
Fwd: Trump Chose the Jews
Rabbi Sorotzkin Teshuva - Tikun of ending the Golus - yearn for recognition of G-d's Kingdom, yearn for Davidic Kingdom and yearn for return of Temple Service. Msg following Har Nof Massacre
From: "Jews Choose Trump" <info@jewschoosetrump.org>
Date: Dec 23, 2017 8:05 PM
Subject: Trump Chose the Jews
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>
Cc:
Trump Chose the Jews At the UN General Assembly on Dec. 21, President Trump courageously had the US stand with Israel against virtually the entire wo
Trump Chose the Jews
At the UN General Assembly on Dec. 21, President Trump courageously had the US stand with Israel against virtually the entire world. President Trump chose to stand with Israel and to chastise America's other allies for their hypocrisy. He did more than that; he said that actions have consequences and that America would financially penalize those nations who opposed the US recognition of Israel's capital and the US moving its embassy to Jerusalem.
The US media did not focus on the fact that a record 65 states abstained from voting in favor of the resolution. Instead the media highlighted that our European allies voted against the US, without pointing out how these nations have become hostages to their growing Muslim populations and threats of terrorism.
Jewish critics of President Trump love to heap praise on Ambassador Nikki Haley as if her clear voice in support of Israel at the UN reflected anything other than the policies of the president of the US. Ambassador Haley is President Trump's representative; she is not a free agent. It is Trump's policies she expounded when she said at the UN:
" America will put our embassy in Jerusalem. That is what the American people want us to do, and it is the right thing to do. No vote in the United Nations will make any difference on that.
But this vote will make a difference on how Americans look at the UN and on how we look at countries who disrespect us in the UN. And this vote will be remembered."American Jewish communal organizations were quick to denounce the UN vote; but they could not bring themselves to praise President Trump for his courageous stand. By their partisan actions, they forfeit their right to speak for the communal interests of American Jews.
Their failure makes it crucially important that we coalesce in grassroots organizations to speak out.
Over the opposition of the rest of the world, President Trump Chose the Jews. Thank you, Mr. President.
JewsChooseTrump.org is a nationwide grassroots organization
©2017 Jews Choose Trump | 62 William St, New York, NY 10005
Web Version Forward Unsubscribe
Powered by
GoDaddy Email Marketing ®
Sunday, December 24, 2017
Friday, December 22, 2017
Canada Obsessed with Islamophobia
Fwd: article and tour by Shalom Pollack. IDF Soldiers act Gentlemanly and with Restraint.... or Humiliated?
From: "Shalom Pollack" <shalompollack613@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 22, 2017 6:25 AM
Subject: article and tour
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>
Cc:
|
|
Thursday, December 21, 2017
Wednesday, December 20, 2017
Fwd: Behind “Disengagement”: The Ugly Truth NY Prof. Paul Eidelberg
From: "Paul Eidelberg" <foundation612.12@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 19, 2017 11:58 PM
Subject: Behind "Disengagement": The Ugly Truth
To: "danostg@gmail.com>" <danostg@gmail.com>
Cc:
Behind "Disengagement": The Ugly Truth
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Fourteen years ago, those who gave the Likud a stunning victory over Labor in the January 2003 election never expected they would be ruled by a party responsible for Oslo and rejected by an overwhelmingly majority of the electorate. They never expected a government whose parliamentary approval would depend on the support of Arab MKs, as well as on a far-left party like Meretz that wants to transform the Jewish state into "a state of its citizens." The 2003 election was an affirmation of Zionism. Ariel Sharon nullified that election and made nonsense of democracy!
The central issue of that election was "disengagement" – a euphemism for the expulsion of Jews from Gaza and other parts of Israel. The only reason why the Likud trashed Labor in that election is because Mr. Sharon campaigned against Labor's disengagement/expulsion policy. Whereas Labor won only 19 seats, the Likud won 38 – a disparity unprecedented in Israel's history. Yet the new Sharon government, with Labor chairman Shimon Peres as Sharon's viceroy, was hell-bent on creating an Arab state by expelling Jews from Judea and Samaria!
To appreciate the extent of Sharon's betrayal of the nation, let us tally the number of seats won by parties that opposed disengagement/expulsion on security and Zionist or religious grounds:
Likud — 38 seats
Israel B'Aliya — 2 seats (which subsequently joined the Likud)
National Union — 7 seats
National Religious Party — 6 seats
Shas — 11 seats
United Torah Judaism — 5 seats
The above electoral results produced a Knesset with 69 of its 120 members opposed to disengagement/expulsion! But there is more to be said about Sharon's betrayal of the nation. In that 2003 election, Shinui, which won 15 seats, spoke against unilateral disengagement (but subsequently yielded to Israel's Machiavellian prime minister).
And so, thanks to Sharon, Israel obtained an ostensibly democratically elected government committed to a policy that was decisively rejected by the electorate! But how can one rightly attribute this undemocratic state of affairs to the treachery of one man?
Such treachery could only occur in a country lacking institutional checks and balances, a country whose system of government is intrinsically susceptible to dictatorship. Yet there is not a single party or faction in the Knesset that exposed this despotic state of affairs; and none called for systemic institutional reform to reverse the disastrous course of this nation. Why not? Because every party has a vested interest in preserving the existing system! No less than the illustrious Alexis de Tocqueville defines this system as "democratic despotism" – a system that enables a democratically government to ignore public opinion with IMPUNITY!
What perpetuates this despotic system is a simple fact: In Israel the entire country constitutes a single electoral district in which fixed party lists compete on the basis of proportional representation. The result is party dictatorship on the hand, and, on the other hand, a Knesset whose members are not individually accountable to the voters in constituency elections. This renders the Legislature, the Knesset, subservient to the Executive. i.e., the Government, above all, its Prime Minister. And now, the Prime Minister, instead of being primus inter pares, can dismiss cabinet ministers as if he were a President of the United States. (In America, however, the late Mr. Sharon would have been impeached long ago for malfeasance of office.)
Therefore, those who opposed the expulsion of Jews from their homes in Gaza, but who remained silent about the grotesque structure of a government that made Ariel Sharon the Labor's Party's surrogate prime minister, are not innocent. Lacking the guts to reveal that Israel is not a genuine democracy, hence, that Israel is in need of "regime change," those who opposed the crime of Gaza – called such by Benjamin Netanyahu's father (!) – will only perpetuate democratic despotism and thereby facilitate the policy of "disengagement" they rightly called evil.◙
Tuesday, December 19, 2017
Fwd: NO MORAL BACKBONE from truth provider on Barak Obama empowering Hezbollah. These revelations require the immediate appointment of Special Counselor and indictments of the perpetrators, including the 44th President, should the revelations prove true.
From: "Truth Provider" <yuval@truthprovider.com>
Date: Dec 19, 2017 11:14 AM
Subject: NO MORAL BACKBONE
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>
Cc:
Dear friends,
Professor Abraham Ben-Zvi is one of Israel's foremost authorities on US affairs. He is not "right" or "left" just a scholar. Here is his article published today about the latest Obama-Hezbollah revelations.
As I mentioned yesterday, these revelations require the immediate appointment of Special Counselor and indictments of the perpetrators, including the 44th President, should the revelations prove true.
Your Truth Provider,
Yuval.
http://www.israelhayom.com/
opinions/no-moral-backbone/ No moral backbone
By Professor Abraham Ben-Zvi
The 44th president of the United States, Barack Obama, who won the Nobel Peace Prize before he even managed to make an impression on the international reality, and who tirelessly repeated his commitment to promoting universal values and morality, is now being portrayed as someone who crossed all normative red lines by allowing Hezbollah and its satellites to carry out crimes undisturbed, even on U.S. soil.
Indeed, according to an expose by the news site Politico, it appears that the Obama administration knowingly thwarted the Drug Enforcement Agency's "Project Cassandra," which was designed to deal a fatal blow to Hezbollah's global logistics, finances and operations. The work was supposed to have exposed the corrupt channels through which enormous revenues from drug deals were funneled. The money was directed, via drug lords and business people with contacts - straight to Hezbollah, and allowed the organization to improve its military capabilities.
The Politico report also said that the regime of President Bashar Assad in Syria, a strategic partner of the Lebanese terrorist group, enjoyed the rotten fruits of this conduit in the form of shipments of conventional and chemical weapons to Damascus during the Syrian civil war. Despite the frightening picture revealed by those involved in Project Cassandra, it quickly became apparent that the upper echelon of the Obama administration, particularly the U.S. Justice and Treasury departments, consistently blocked the effort to eliminate the drugs and weapons axis, thus giving Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah and Assad the quiet and the room to maneuver that they needed.
If even a fraction of the facts detailed in the report by the reliable site are accurate, they would provide sufficient ground to rip off the drapes of righteousness that still cover the true nature of the Obama era. Specifically, if indeed "all the president's men" thwarted the operation to avoid spoiling the relations between Washington and Hezbollah's patron, Iran, in the period when Obama was working feverishly to set up the nuclear deal with Tehran, it expresses the unbearable cynicism of the White House that prided itself on a flawless "ethical code" of conduct in the international arena, including its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
This latest affair is like a tunnel that sends us back through time to the end of World War II and the start of the Cold War, when the administration of then-President Harry Truman stopped at nothing to enlist some 1,600 Nazi scientists, engineers and technicians, particularly in the field of missile development. That campaign, which was dubbed Operation Paperclip, is now considered the essence of immoral, inhumane conduct, which ignored the crimes against humanity the candidates had committed.
It is becoming clear that the liberal President Obama did not learn from history, and in complete contradiction of his saintly statements, effectively gave a green light to an entire web of ongoing crimes, based on his perception - ridiculous in itself - that it was in America's national interest to do so.
To sum up, Obama not only refrained from taking action against the ruler of Syria when he crossed all the red lines that had been drawn on chemical warfare but also contributed - if indirectly - to Assad building up his chemical arsenal and deploying it against his own civilian population. Obama deserved a Nobel Prize for his Machiavellian, opportunistic and immoral conduct, which also hurt the security of the U.S.'s partner, Israel.
If you no longer wish to receive messages from Truth Provider, please click here to unsubscribe.Please enter UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.