Monday, February 18, 2019
Sunday, February 17, 2019
The spy who never loved me: A mother of 7 says her marriage was a Shin Bet cover | The Times of Israel
Bsd
Please note that the Times of Israel, even in this article pushes the Libelous Narrative of "Jewish Terrorists."
I personally knew Dr. Baruch Goldstein a compassionate doctor who saw first hand too many terror attacks of his friends and neighbors.. I still can't believe this drove him crazy to murder 29 innocent Arabs. I knew his family. His mother was President of Emunah Women, living in Kiryat Arba, an Anglo, having made Aliya with her husband and was friend with his sister who married a Chabad Chosid way before the 29 Arabs were killed in Maarat Hamachpela.
I heard there were bullets on the ceiling of the Maara. I don't know what happened except that it was totally out character.
It makes no sense that Baruch Goldstein would enter the Maara and for absolutely no good reason use a heavy machine gun against innocent Arabs who were praying.
The Truth is in known in a Heavenly Court. I hope and pray it will be revealed.
Shabak has a history of inciting and framing Jews for the purpose of pushing the "Jewish Terrorist" Narrative on Jews who want a Torah State. This Torah ideology is consistent with the Marienbad resolution of the Moetzet Gedolei in Marienbad in 1937 and no different than the Torah ideology recited in our daily prayers 3times a day, in our Bentching, part of the passages in Tefillin, repeated again and again in Torah Shebichtav and Tanach, fundamental to People of the Book, shared by all People of Faith, not only religious Jews, be it Chasidish, Yeshivish Litvush, Religious Zionist Modern Orthodox and nonJews as well ...in our daily, Shabbat and Holiday Prayers...
Restore our Judges as of Days of Yore.
Rabbi Meir Kahane was not a Terrorist nor did he ever advocate killing innocent Arabs. Listen to him on YouTube.
He advocated Jewish Rights of Self Defense and the transfer of hostile Arabs of a Jewish State, to 22 neighboring Muslim Arab countries. He advocated for civil rights of nonJews living in Israel if they support a Jewish State but was against giving them the right to vote ( Democracy can vote itself out as well he said).
"Jewish Terrorism" Narrative feeds the 2 State Solution Peace Process.
It is not to protect Arabs from Jewish Terror.
Shabak claim lots of success in preventing acts Jewish Terror against Terror.
Too bad they have a dismal record in preventing real Arab terror attacks occurring daily in Judea and Samaria with too many miraculous Hashgacha Pratis stories of misses and every one in 40 or so hitting a Jewish target with another Jewish victim.
They don't do DNA on stones thrwn by Arabs. They even ignore photos of the Arab Stone throwers.
Why are the focused on nonexistent "Jewish Terror" in spite if all their Herculean efforts to produce them while turning a blind Eye to Arab Terror and the Culture of Terror in UNRWA schools?
Jewish Division of Terror of Shabak wants to manufacture the narrative of "Jewish Terror" via moles and informants picking on the weak and vulnerable when possible.
...Using all their resources to neutralize any narrative that sounds too connected to the Torah and targeting it's leaders.
The Machteret were not Jewish Terrorists. They were religious Zionists as was Rabbi Meir Kahane. Their Torah ideology was threatening to a Secular State and threatening to powerful polical forces.
The story of this woman is sadly very true.
Fwd: Pollard's treatment: A Betrayal That Must End
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <imra@imra.org.il>
Date: Sat, Feb 16, 2019, 3:47 PM
Subject: Pollard's treatment: A Betrayal That Must End
To: <imra@imra.org.il>
From: <imra@imra.org.il>
Date: Sat, Feb 16, 2019, 3:47 PM
Subject: Pollard's treatment: A Betrayal That Must End
To: <imra@imra.org.il>
A Betrayal That Must End
Hamodia Editorial
Tuesday, February 12, 2019 at 6:17 pm
https://hamodia.com/2019/02/12/betrayal-must-end/
Betrayal is a very harsh term to use in any context. How much more so when
it is used to describe the treatment of a government towards its own
bona-fide agent.
Yet, betrayal describes precisely the way the government of Israel has
treated Jonathan Pollard for the past 33 years.
It is time for that betrayal to end.
As readers of these pages are no doubt aware, Pollard was a civilian
American naval intelligence analyst who, in the mid-1980s, passed classified
information to Israel. The information wasn't about America; it was
information about Israel's sworn enemies that America was supposed to — but
didn't want to — share with Israel.
Motivated by a genuine concern for the safety of the Jews in Eretz Yisrael,
Pollard gave over crucial material relating to grave threats against
Israel — information that helped save Jewish lives. Subsequently
declassified documents show that while Pollard's activities may have ruffled
some Arab feathers in the Middle East, there was no material impact on U.S.
national security.
(Though he acted out of a well-placed concern for the safety of his
brethren, on numerous occasions Pollard has expressed his sincere regret for
breaking the law and not finding a legal way to help Israel.)
In 1985, his actions were discovered by the U.S. government. The Israeli
government first used him to hold off the FBI while it evacuated all the
rest of the team to Israel.
Yet when he followed his instructions to seek refuge in the Israeli embassy
in Washington, he and his former wife were at first received and then
summarily thrown out — into the waiting arms of the FBI.
The Israeli government then proceeded to hand over all the documents that
they received from Pollard — with his fingerprints still on them. At the
request of both the U.S. and Israeli governments, he entered into a plea
agreement, which spared both governments a long, difficult, expensive and
potentially embarrassing trial.
The median sentence for the crime he committed — passing classified
information to an ally — was 2 to 4 years.
Pollard honored his side of the agreement, but in an astonishing travesty of
justice, the U.S. government proceeded to break its promise not to seek a
life sentence. Based on a last-minute affidavit by then-Defense Secretary
Caspar Weinberger, the Judge sentenced him to life in prison. According to
Professor Lawrence J. Korb, who served as Assistant Secretary of Defense at
the time, Weinberger was motivated by "an almost visceral dislike of Israel
and the special place it occupies in our foreign policy."
There are ample indications that the reason Pollard was treated so
differently than the others who gave classified information to an ally was
not because of what he did, but because of who he was — an American Jew —
and because the country he was helping was Israel.
Yet from the very beginning of this terrible saga, the Israeli government
not only abandoned Pollard, but actually betrayed him.
His first lawyer, Richard Hibey, was a Lebanese-American hired by the
Israeli government.
After the sentencing hearing, Hibey had 10 days to file a document to
protect Jonathan's right to appeal his life sentence. He did not file the
document. As a result, Pollard was never able to appeal his life sentence.
Ever since it found and paid for the lawyer who secured a life sentence for
Pollard, the government of Israel never again gave even a minimal sum
towards Pollard's legal bills or personal expenses.
For more than a decade, Israel even denied that he was a bona-fide agent,
claiming that his actions were the result of an "unauthorized rogue
operation."
Only under pressure of lawsuits in the Israeli High Court did Israel finally
grant him citizenship in 1995, and in May of 1998 — more than 12 years after
he was first arrested — the Israeli government finally acknowledged that
Jonathan Pollard was in fact an Israeli agent. While, on paper, they took
responsibility for him, in reality, successive Israeli governments failed
miserably in their obligation to bring him home.
Again and again, Pollard has been used as a pawn in the "peace process."
Former President Clinton actually promised to release Pollard (at the
suggestion of the Palestinians) as a way to get the Israeli government to
free hundreds of terrorists. After the deal was struck, America once again
broke its promise. The terrorists were released; Pollard remained in prison.
In November of 2015, after serving 30 years in prison, Pollard was released
on parole and permitted to join his wife, Mrs. Esther Pollard, who has
dedicated her life with enormous mesirus nefesh on his behalf. But he is
still far from free, as he languishes under illogical, oppressive parole
restrictions. While the very concept that after 33 years Pollard still has
any secret information in his head is in itself absurd, the details of the
restrictions illustrate that the intent is to harass, rather than to protect
any secrets.
At all times he is required to wear a GPS monitoring system which tracks his
location. He is permitted to speak with anyone and walk the streets near his
Manhattan residence — during the daytime. A trip to nearby Brooklyn — or a
different part of Manhattan — is off-limits as, for some unexplainable
reason, that would be a national security risk.
As soon as the clock strikes 7:00 p.m., he must stay inside his apartment
until morning. He is permitted to freely receive guests in his apartment at
night. It is only being on the street at night that is considered a threat
to America's security interests…
The restrictions also include the unfettered monitoring and inspection of
his computers, as well as those of any employer who chooses to hire him,
which has prevented him from being able to gain employment.
Some advocates on his behalf have been brushed off with the assertion that
by November 2020 — five years after his release from prison— the
restrictions will be lifted.
It is true that, as the government stated in a footnote to one of their
legal briefs in this case, "There is a statutory presumption that five years
after a parolee's release, the Commission shall terminate supervision over
such parolee unless the Parole Commission makes a showing that there is a
likelihood that the parolee will engage in conduct violating any criminal
law."
However, history has shown that when it comes to Jonathan Pollard,
presumptions simply don't apply. The "visceral dislike" towards Israel and
American Jews that caused him to receive a life sentence in the first place
has not disappeared. The same government officials who have insisted on
these irrational, oppressive restrictions will be the ones making the
decision whether or not to lift them in 2020, and they have the legal
(though not the moral) ability to keep them in place until 2030.
In the meantime, Pollard sits and waits for the Israeli government to
fulfill its obligations. Last March, Prime Minister Netanyahu reportedly met
with President Trump and proposed a bureaucratic solution to the problem via
the U.S. Department of Justice, known as "Treaty Transfer," whereby Pollard
would be granted permission to return to Israel, to live there and finish
his parole there. The president and virtually all of his cabinet are said to
have agreed.
However, the Department of Justice is still populated by Obama holdovers.
They dragged out the process for months, and then turned down the
application for Treaty Transfer on the basis of spurious and false
assertions.
As an essential part of his reelection campaign, Netanyahu is touting his
close, personal relationship with President Trump. Massive billboards
featuring an image of the two have sprung up on highways in Israel.
Relative to some of his predecessors, who made it clear that they had no
interest in Pollard ever obtaining his freedom, Netanyahu has done the bare
minimum on Pollard's behalf. But after so many years of betrayal, the least
that Jonathan deserves is a concerted, comprehensive effort by Netanyahu and
all members of his government to bring Pollard back to Israel.
President Trump has proven to be a devoted friend of Israel and an
individual who is prepared to make courageous decisions. All it should take
is a message from Israel that this is of the highest priority, and the facts
of the case will already speak for themselves.
It is perhaps unrealistic to ask a politician to act on moral grounds,
especially in the heat of an election campaign. However, the fact that there
is broad public support for the Pollard cause among the Israeli public
should suffice to convince Mr. Netanyahu that Jonathan Pollard deserves more
than lip service and empty promises. It is time for concrete actions and
real-time hishtadlus.
________________________________________
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Since 1992 providing news and analysis on the Middle East with a focus on Arab-Israeli relations
Website: www.imra.org.il
For free regular subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe: imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il
For free daily digest subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe-digest@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe: imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il
IMRA is now also on Twitter
http://twitter.com/IMRA_UPDATES
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
