Wednesday, March 04, 2020

WZC Progressive Lovefest with Terror Supporters that Want to Destroy Israel by Avi Abelow. Please Watch Herut's (Slate 10) Video against HATIKVA

Bsd

Please watch this excellent video produced by the Herut Slate exposing the illegitimacy of J Street and the HATiKVA slate in the WZO. 

Jews who align with those intent on the destruction of Israel and with forces that glorify terror attacks against Israeli civilians, should be marginalized and excluded from WZO. This is a red line that should not be crossed.

 Hatikvah's platform is deceptively Zionistic.  Like Taqiya.   

They in fact are anti-Zionism and their agenda is a contradiction of the Jerusalem Program https://azm.org/wzo/jerusalem-program and Israel's Declaration of Independence. https://g.co/kgs/u6JxpH


WZC Progressive Lovefest with Terror Supporters that Want to Destroy Israel by Avi Abelow. 
https://israelunwired.com/progressive-lovefest-with-terror-supporters-that-want-to-destroy-israel/ 

Fwd: Transcription Interview Jamie Glazov and Daniel Greenfield. How being an Orthodox Jew and being a leftist is ideologically impossible and is a contradiction in terms

Bsd

Thank you Myriam Gabay for sharing this with me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=41&v=Mdr23jLkFC4&feature=emb_title

Glazov Gang: Can a Devout Jew Be a Leftist?

The Glazov Gang

6/19/18


5:53 Jamie: In terms of your identity, in terms of your faith why are they [Orthodox Jews] so opposed to the leftist vision of the world and why does the leftist viewpoint so much hate the Judeo-Christian tradition and also the Jewish people and Israel etc?

Daniel: At the most basic level, the left is a secular religion. It worships man rather than God. It's powered by the idea that we can actually take government and replace God with government and then build an entire cultic personality, an entire religion around people, or monsters really, such as Stalin, or Hitler or Castro or ____, all other ones such as Mao and with that cultic personality we can justify human sacrifice such as the sacrifice of millions of people to show the power of government. Anti God is the most fundamental level (of leftist ideology) and it invariably comes after the Jews because if you're building an ideology that's hostile to God as opposed to the very idea of God and of spirituality in the world then you have to trust the very people who introduced this into the world. If you believe that there's nothing in this world but material reality, that there's nothing meaningful but force and power then the best way to demonstrate that is, again,to destroy the Jews. 

Jamie: Yes, and I've read a lot on this. Jews are hated very much by many in the world because they created conscience.

Daniel: Yes, that's the fundamental reality of it because conscience comes from the recognition that there's a higher moral authority; that there's something outside ourselves.If there's nothing outside ourselves then conscience is meaningless. It's just how you're just accountable to yourself. It's something like honor. If you recognize that there is a God then you recognize that there's something higher than you that you have to be accountable to. There's somebody who knows what you did and [to whom] you can't lie to,and that's a very powerful idea. 

Jamie: And when you are a self appointed social redeemer and you make yourself a God,then you hate the idea of God and of a God's hierarchy (?).

Daniel: There's no room for it at all because the left seeks (?) salvation and damnation  from within man so man is destroying the world through global warming, or whatever they'recall it now; climate change and then man can save the world by recycling. There's the whole drama of salvation and damnation and redemption; you can transform the world; you can change the world. There's sin. Sin goes against anything that the left believes in; against any of its social policies. And of course there are the good deeds. There is redemption through social justice. And all this is meant to displace the actual religion and any idea of God so you have to destroy those things in order to make the ideology of the left completely triumphant in the world and that's why every leftist regime is invariably militantly socialist,anti religious and it persecutes religious people. 

Jamie: Daniel, how can a person that considers himself a Jew, possibly be a leftist? [Yet] there are so many leftist Jews.

Daniel: Well they can't. When we're talking about Jews we're talking about a race, an ethnic group and we're also talking about a religion. Now there are of course plenty of people with Jewish last names who are ethnically..., [who were] originally were Jewish but that's___ meaningless. Jewish is an identity and it's also a religious practice of something that you bring down from your parents and something that you pass down to your children. If your not part of this continuous chain then you're not part of the Jewish people; you're just a person with a Jewish last name. Now, the process of leftist  ___tation has created a weird very reality that, for example, the majority of American Jews rate having a sense of humor as being more important to being Jewish then actually believing in religion of attending synagogue anytime on a regular basis. Having a sense of humor is very nice and I think I have a little bit of a sense of humor but if you think that your identity and the identity of the Jewish people is defined by having a sense of humor than you're kind of out to lunch. 

Jamie: And it could be legitimately said that leftist Jews are ultimately Jews that are trying to shed themselves of their own Judaism.

Daniel: That's very much so. So there's kind of a historical basis for this. Once the left took over it provided opportunities to assimilate, to integrate into society in exchange for abandonment of religion and     this was a very explicit bargain and in the Society Union it was far more explicitly, basically... For example my grandfather was never able to get a higher education because his father was actually considered a religious worker which meant that in Soviet terms he was one of the followers of a cult which meant that he could never have proper civil rights. So the Soviet Union did everything it could to stamp out Judaism,to stamp out the practice of religion because it's goal was to wipe [religion] out. Now the people of the Soviet Union refusing to do this dirty, at least initially,  were known as the Yevsektsiya, or The Jewish Section, so they would take these leftist Jews; and these people [leftist Jews] would very willingly and very enthusiastically would shut down synagogues, they would inform on people, they would attack worshipers during services,they would attack rabbis, they wound denounce people and make sure they were sent to the Gulag where they were executed because it was this kind of civil war between those Jews who actually believed in the religion and those [Jews] who believed in the left and that civil war is still going on today. 

Jamie: Right, because when the left creates its Utopian paradise where everybody holds hands and is equal the Jew that hates himself or is somewhere trying to shed himself of his Judaism or is maybe so frightened by anti-Semitism, he doesn't have to be a Jew anymore in that Utopian paradise. Right?

Daniel: That's exactly so. And this is something that Lenin wrote about, it's something that Cherwells (?) and others wrote about. Their sales pitch was that there are actually no Jews and that these people were just being singled out and were a bit confused and [that they]were going to integrate with the rest of society and their Jewishness will banish and those that refuse to are reactionaries and they're going to have to be cracked down on and this was their general approach to religion. 

Fwd: Daniel Greenfield's article: How the Administrative State Defied Trump to Cause a Coronvirus Crisis. (The Evils of Bureaucracy)!!

Bsd

There needs to be an indeoendent control group beholden to no one, to evaluate the process, send recommendations to help identify and hopefully eliminate the bureaucracy that is  focused on following protocol and procedure but leaves out common sense. 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Sultan Knish <noreply+feedproxy@google.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 4, 2020, 8:42 AM
Subject: Daniel Greenfield's article: How the Administrative State Defied Trump to Cause a Coronvirus Crisis
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>


Daniel Greenfield's article: How the Administrative State Defied Trump to Cause a Coronvirus Crisis

Link to Sultan Knish

How the Administrative State Defied Trump to Cause a Coronvirus Crisis

Posted: 03 Mar 2020 11:15 AM PST

Two months after the outbreak of the coronavirus, #TrumpVirus began trending on Twitter. Why? Because it's the only chance that the Democrats have of winning back the White House in 2020.

Saddled with broken primaries whose nominee, after a possible brokered convention, will either be a Socialist who admires Communists, a senile lecher who admires young girls, or a billionaire who admires power, the coronavirus is a much more effective candidate than Sanders, Biden, or Bloomberg.

#TrumpVirus follows in the footsteps of #TrumpHurricane which attempted to blame a natural disaster and local corruption in Puerto Rico on President Trump. And that just dusted off the smears and slanders of Hurricane Katrina and substituted Puerto Ricans for black people and Trump for Bush.

Not to mention the CDC for FEMA.

The truth about disaster relief and pandemic management is that it hasn't changed much between administrations. The Bush administration dealt with SARS in much the same way that the Obama administration addressed swine flu. And the Trump administration is doing most of the same things.

That's because the actual decisions are being made by bureaucrats based on existing protocols.

The best example of this was the decision to fly back infected American passengers from the Diamond Princess. This fateful decision helped spread the virus inside the United States.

President Trump had been told that nobody with the coronavirus would be flown to America.

The State Department decided to do it anyway without telling him and only made the announcement shortly after the planes landed in the United States.

According to the Washington Post, as unfriendly an outlet to the administration as there is, "Trump has since had several calls with top White House officials to say he should have been told, that it should have been his decision and that he did not agree with the decision that was made."

Who in the State Department actually made the decision? That's a very good question.

According to a State Department briefing, the missions were carried out by the Directorate of Operational Medicine within the Bureau of Medical Services. You might think that sounds like it would be part of HHS or NIH, but the Bureau of Medical Services is actually an arm of the State Department.

The Directorate of Operational Medicine is a part of the Bureau assigned to deal with crisis response with a $250 million portfolio and a lot of employees that almost no one outside D.C. ever heard of. At least unless you remember an event at which Barack Obama honored Dr. William Walters, the head of the Directorate, for evacuating Ebola patients to the United States.

"Now, remember, the decision to move Kent back to the United States was controversial. Some worried about bringing the disease to our shores. But what folks like William knew was that we had to make the decisions based not on fear, but on science," Obama said.

By "some", Obama meant, among others, Trump, who had been a strong critic of the move.

Despite Obama's end-zone dance, the State Department had badly botched the Ebola evacuations.

Under Bush, the CDC had prepped an evacuation aircraft for flying out contagious Americans. The Obama administration shelved the gear because of the cost, and then failed to make use of it. The evacuation process led to the same infighting between the State Department and the CDC as now.

Dr. William Walters is still on duty. In 2017, Walters was boasting of prepping more Ebola evacuations even over President Trump's opposition to the practice. And he was once again at the wheel now.

"The question was simply this: Are these evacuees?" Walters explained the decision to evacuate coronavirus patients to the United States. "And do we follow our protocol? And the answer to that was yes on both accounts."

Consulting President Trump was not part of the protocol even on a major national security issue.

In a Congressional briefing, Walters boasted that, "the Department executed the largest non-military evacuation of U.S. citizens in its history. The safe and efficient evacuation of 1,174 people from Wuhan, China and people onboard the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan is a testament to the agility, proficiency, and dedication of our workforce to accomplishing our core mission – advancing the interests of the American people."

And the triumph of the administrative state and its bureaucratic protocols over the President.

At a State Department briefing, Walters stated that, "The chief of mission, right, through the U.S. embassy, is ultimately the head of all executive branch activities."

That is the problem. Right there.

Walters got his job in 2011. He's a relic of the Obama era. That doesn't mean that his politics are those of his former boss. But this is not about him. It's about the reality that the White House doesn't make many of the most vital decisions and doesn't even know that they're being made until it's too late.

And what that means, beyond the politics of the moment, is that the people don't decide.

You can vote one way or another and the real decisions that matter will still be made by the head of a directorate that is a subsection of a bureau that you never heard of, but that has a budget in the hundreds of millions, a small army as its disposal, and will follow whatever the protocol is.

This is how the country is really run. And that's the problem.

The underlying problem with our government is that it's too big to control. Voting in an election or even sitting in the Oval Office doesn't mean you're in charge. The problem goes beyond the current obsession with the Deep State. The real issue has always been the Deep Industry or the administrative state.

If the coronavirus becomes a critical problem in this country, the blame will go back to an obscure arm of the State Department, but it will never be placed there. Whatever happens a year from now, no one outside a small professional class will have ever heard of the Directorate of Operational Medicine.

The media will spend all its time bashing President Trump, Pence, assorted cabinet members, and perhaps the CDC, without ever drilling down to the facts, even though it has them at hand. The media's rule of thumb is that natural disasters and disease outbreaks are always successfully managed by Democrats and mismanaged by Republicans. Katrina and Maria were disasters, but Sandy was a success story. The coronavirus is a catastrophe, but the Ebola virus was brilliantly handed by smart people who are handling the coronavirus response. But it's different because the guy in the White House is.

The truth is that all of these were mismanaged by the same agencies, many of the same people, and by a government infrastructure that excels at drawing up big budget proposals, but is inept at solving problems when they actually emerge, and just follow whatever protocols will cover its collective asses.

All the rest is a matter of the uncontrollable, the innate qualities of the storm or the disease, and the story that the media chooses to tell about the disaster in the service of its political agenda.

Even during the dying days of impeachment, the media was forced to realize that there was more interest in the coronavirus than there was in its attacks on Trump. The unfortunate decision to evacuate infected people to this country, against President Trump's explicit wishes, provided the media with the opportunity to combine its attacks on Trump with the coverage of the coronavirus for ratings gold.

And if the stock market goes on falling, and the economy declines, it can even pull off a narrative coup.

Just as after Katrina and Maria, watch for the outpouring of lies, the claims that New Orleans had reverted to cannibalism and that everyone in Puerto Rico was dead, will be matched and exceeded.

There will be a cure for the coronavirus. But there's no cure for the spread of viral fake news.

There is however a cure for the decisions that led to a coronavirus problem in the United States.

It's called the Constitution.

America was meant to have a small government under the control of the people, not the bureaucrats. The real disease is bigger than the coronavirus. It's a fatal illness called big government. Unlike the coronavirus, it has a total mortality rate. No society that has succumbed to it has ever survived.





Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.

Thank you for reading.

You are subscribed to email updates from Sultan Knish .
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States

Tuesday, March 03, 2020

Re: 'The Deal of The Century" and it's about our Sovereignty 30 sec YouTube by Ezra Ridley

Bsd

Beautiful!

it's 30 seconds.  takes place: Gush Eztion tunnel!


Posted on Shemittahrediscovered

From Igud HaRabonim: Emergency Meeting for Rabbonim re Voting for WZC, tomorrow Wed March 4 6:45-7:30 YI KGH

Bsd

Please fwd to Rabbonim. TYSM!
IGUD HaRABONIM Queens Jewish Link and Bukahrian Jewish Link is inviting the Rabbonim to an EMERGENCY MEETING!! 
When:   Wed March 4, 2020
Where.   Young Israel of Kew Garden Hills
Time:     6:45 - 7:30 pm
For more information and to rsvp:Rabbi@igud.us. or call 347 580-2243

Flier to a meeting for the General public 7:30-8:45pm

HaTikvah Platform. Fyi OY!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LdYyeNNrpU3nkosP9jksOkQ7vHMix9YI/view?usp=drivesdk