https://www.jewishpress.com/news/on-campus/source-accused-teens-yeshiva-dean-main-prosecution-witness/2019/01/24/
Bsd
Bsd
I don't trust Shabak. I also don't trust the Dean.
When examining a case in a Jewish Court of Law the judge must consider all sides as guilty at the onset until all the evidence is presented.
Shabak is under lots of heat and pressure to produce a Jewish Terrorist. They will stop at nothing, torture, lies, blackmail etc.
They probably changed the charges to manslaughter so that they can negotiate reduced charges because Shabak right now is losing credibility. They don't look so good in the media. Especially in social media which is harder to control.
They can save face from mounting allegations and negative public opinion against them of fabricating evidence to manufacture Jewish Terrorists by offering a plea bargain deal letting the kid go off easy with Manslaughter charges rather than murder charges by suggesting that they are saving Tzvi Nerya from a 25 year prison sentence.
Tzvi Nerya if innocent should never agree to a plea bargain but maintain his innocence.!
What would motivate Tzvi Neriah to stone an Arab car.
It is against Halacha. Neither his Parents or his Yeshiva would condone it.
He wasn't a rebel kid or kid at risk and why would he purposefully commit an act contrary to Halacha and contrary to what he was taught?
Why would Shabak assume these kids believe throwing rocks at random Arab cars is permissable Halachically. Indeed they don't brag about it or admit they did it and they deny vehemantly all allegations?
As soon as the heat is off Shabak, they probably won't care about sacrificing another kid on the alter if they can get away with it, and renege on the plea bargain like they did with Jonathan Pollard.
Sorry for being cynical.
Several questions come to mind.
Was the Rosh Yeshiva either entrapped or blackmailed to providing a refutation of the students Alibi. That was my first reaction.
Why didn't this Rosh Yeshiva help Meir Ettinger, Elisha Odess and Amiram Ben Uliel from trumped up Shabak charges and protest 3 and a half years these Duma suspects have been suffering with no credible evidence? Was he afraid that they would come after him and his Yeshiva? Even now they refuse to speak about the Duma suspects and connect the dots.
Why would a Rosh Yeshiva testify against his Talmid?
So if we are to judge the Rosh Yeshiva in a positive light he either lied to protect Tzvi Nerya and provide him with an Alibi but it was inconsistent or if we judge the Rosh Yeshiva in not such a positive light, he lied to protect himself.
The Rosh Yeshiva could have easily been blackmailed. This whole Parshah is a black stain on Shabak and they can blackmail almost anyone. What comes to mind several possibilities. He could have been blackmailed that he would lose all the stipends of each student declaring the yeshiva a hotbed of terrorism thereby effectively closing down the Yeshiva. This has happened in the past.
Or perhaps they caught him or a family member doing something illegal or immoral and exposing it would cause the Rosh Yeshiva terrible embarrassment. Netanyahu and Sharon and all politicians are not immune to such blackmail.
If he submitted a fake Alibi to save Tzvi Nerya from prosecution wouldn't he have colluded with the family and the lawyer so it would have been consistent?
In either case, we can conclude that if his story is inconsistent with the Alibi of the defendant than the Rosh Yeshivas story was suspect.
If it was a descrepant Alibi The Rosh Yeshiva must have made it up since if it was the truth and an Alibi it would have been consistent.
If it was the truth why would the lawyer suggest Tzvi Nerya give another Alibi other than the truth?
If the Rosh Yeshiva had no clue where Tzvi Nerya was, he should have been honest and said he really didn't know.
If the Rosh Yeshiva was present where Tzvi Neriah claimed to have been and didn't see him why would he agree to testify and be a key witness against his Talmid. Why didn't he just keep his mouth shut and judge his student favorably rather than help Shabak who have a history of torturing Hilltop youth. .
There is no explanation why Tzvi Neryas Alibi would differ than the Rosh Yeshivas.
Now either Tzvi Neryas Alibi is a lie, or the truth.
It seems to me that if Tzvi Nerya is innocent he would say the truth.
There are different possibilities.
Perhaps his lawyer advised him to lie because the lawyer thought the truth wasn't an Alibi enough.
Perhaps the Rosh Yeshiva lied for him because he thought the truth wasn't an Alibis enough.
Did the lawyer instruct the kid to give an Alibi that wasn't truthful?
Or perhaps the Alibi Tzvi Nerya submitted was accurate.
But, either way the Rosh Yeshivas testimony is suspect and is not credible.
Tzvi Nerias Alibi is really the one that should be examined closely.
Shabak's reasoning:
Shabak needs a discrepancy to invalidate Tzvi Nerya's Alibi and who but the Rosh Yeshiva is more credible?. After all, noone would question a Rosh Yeshivas word.
.
Then they could bolster that with fake DNA evidence
But in this case it's a stupid argument
Why should the Rosh Yeshiva be believed over Tzvi Nerya? He can easily be blackmailed as we discussed or he felt he could justify a lie to protect Tzvi Nerya. His testimony is completely suspect and not to be believed.
What the Rosh Yeshiva says is irrelevant unless he was an accomplice to the Stone throwing murder trying to hide evidence and obstructing justice or an accomplice to Shabak trying to save his own skin
It isn't smart of him to testify against Tzvi Nerya as it might only incriminate himself.
Since the Arab heard the stone throwers speak in Hebrew from his moving vehicle there should be at least another accomplice.
How come all the other students had credible alibis?
