From: "Shalom Pollack" <shalompollack613@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 22, 2017 6:25 AM
Subject: article and tour
To: <faigerayzel@gmail.com>
Cc:
|
|
Shemittah, the Jewish Sabbatical year, brings security and blessing. The Torah says keeping this Mitzvah will prevent disaster and exile. Shemittah is Shabbat LaHashem. A taste of the World to Come. Learn about one womens quest for knowledge and rediscovery of this long lost Mitzvah according to the simple Torah reading of the text found in the beginning posts of this blog.
|
|
Behind "Disengagement": The Ugly Truth
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Fourteen years ago, those who gave the Likud a stunning victory over Labor in the January 2003 election never expected they would be ruled by a party responsible for Oslo and rejected by an overwhelmingly majority of the electorate. They never expected a government whose parliamentary approval would depend on the support of Arab MKs, as well as on a far-left party like Meretz that wants to transform the Jewish state into "a state of its citizens." The 2003 election was an affirmation of Zionism. Ariel Sharon nullified that election and made nonsense of democracy!
The central issue of that election was "disengagement" – a euphemism for the expulsion of Jews from Gaza and other parts of Israel. The only reason why the Likud trashed Labor in that election is because Mr. Sharon campaigned against Labor's disengagement/expulsion policy. Whereas Labor won only 19 seats, the Likud won 38 – a disparity unprecedented in Israel's history. Yet the new Sharon government, with Labor chairman Shimon Peres as Sharon's viceroy, was hell-bent on creating an Arab state by expelling Jews from Judea and Samaria!
To appreciate the extent of Sharon's betrayal of the nation, let us tally the number of seats won by parties that opposed disengagement/expulsion on security and Zionist or religious grounds:
Likud — 38 seats
Israel B'Aliya — 2 seats (which subsequently joined the Likud)
National Union — 7 seats
National Religious Party — 6 seats
Shas — 11 seats
United Torah Judaism — 5 seats
The above electoral results produced a Knesset with 69 of its 120 members opposed to disengagement/expulsion! But there is more to be said about Sharon's betrayal of the nation. In that 2003 election, Shinui, which won 15 seats, spoke against unilateral disengagement (but subsequently yielded to Israel's Machiavellian prime minister).
And so, thanks to Sharon, Israel obtained an ostensibly democratically elected government committed to a policy that was decisively rejected by the electorate! But how can one rightly attribute this undemocratic state of affairs to the treachery of one man?
Such treachery could only occur in a country lacking institutional checks and balances, a country whose system of government is intrinsically susceptible to dictatorship. Yet there is not a single party or faction in the Knesset that exposed this despotic state of affairs; and none called for systemic institutional reform to reverse the disastrous course of this nation. Why not? Because every party has a vested interest in preserving the existing system! No less than the illustrious Alexis de Tocqueville defines this system as "democratic despotism" – a system that enables a democratically government to ignore public opinion with IMPUNITY!
What perpetuates this despotic system is a simple fact: In Israel the entire country constitutes a single electoral district in which fixed party lists compete on the basis of proportional representation. The result is party dictatorship on the hand, and, on the other hand, a Knesset whose members are not individually accountable to the voters in constituency elections. This renders the Legislature, the Knesset, subservient to the Executive. i.e., the Government, above all, its Prime Minister. And now, the Prime Minister, instead of being primus inter pares, can dismiss cabinet ministers as if he were a President of the United States. (In America, however, the late Mr. Sharon would have been impeached long ago for malfeasance of office.)
Therefore, those who opposed the expulsion of Jews from their homes in Gaza, but who remained silent about the grotesque structure of a government that made Ariel Sharon the Labor's Party's surrogate prime minister, are not innocent. Lacking the guts to reveal that Israel is not a genuine democracy, hence, that Israel is in need of "regime change," those who opposed the crime of Gaza – called such by Benjamin Netanyahu's father (!) – will only perpetuate democratic despotism and thereby facilitate the policy of "disengagement" they rightly called evil.◙
Dear friends,
Professor Abraham Ben-Zvi is one of Israel's foremost authorities on US affairs. He is not "right" or "left" just a scholar. Here is his article published today about the latest Obama-Hezbollah revelations.
As I mentioned yesterday, these revelations require the immediate appointment of Special Counselor and indictments of the perpetrators, including the 44th President, should the revelations prove true.
Your Truth Provider,
Yuval.
http://www.israelhayom.com/
opinions/no-moral-backbone/ No moral backbone
By Professor Abraham Ben-Zvi
The 44th president of the United States, Barack Obama, who won the Nobel Peace Prize before he even managed to make an impression on the international reality, and who tirelessly repeated his commitment to promoting universal values and morality, is now being portrayed as someone who crossed all normative red lines by allowing Hezbollah and its satellites to carry out crimes undisturbed, even on U.S. soil.
Indeed, according to an expose by the news site Politico, it appears that the Obama administration knowingly thwarted the Drug Enforcement Agency's "Project Cassandra," which was designed to deal a fatal blow to Hezbollah's global logistics, finances and operations. The work was supposed to have exposed the corrupt channels through which enormous revenues from drug deals were funneled. The money was directed, via drug lords and business people with contacts - straight to Hezbollah, and allowed the organization to improve its military capabilities.
The Politico report also said that the regime of President Bashar Assad in Syria, a strategic partner of the Lebanese terrorist group, enjoyed the rotten fruits of this conduit in the form of shipments of conventional and chemical weapons to Damascus during the Syrian civil war. Despite the frightening picture revealed by those involved in Project Cassandra, it quickly became apparent that the upper echelon of the Obama administration, particularly the U.S. Justice and Treasury departments, consistently blocked the effort to eliminate the drugs and weapons axis, thus giving Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah and Assad the quiet and the room to maneuver that they needed.
If even a fraction of the facts detailed in the report by the reliable site are accurate, they would provide sufficient ground to rip off the drapes of righteousness that still cover the true nature of the Obama era. Specifically, if indeed "all the president's men" thwarted the operation to avoid spoiling the relations between Washington and Hezbollah's patron, Iran, in the period when Obama was working feverishly to set up the nuclear deal with Tehran, it expresses the unbearable cynicism of the White House that prided itself on a flawless "ethical code" of conduct in the international arena, including its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
This latest affair is like a tunnel that sends us back through time to the end of World War II and the start of the Cold War, when the administration of then-President Harry Truman stopped at nothing to enlist some 1,600 Nazi scientists, engineers and technicians, particularly in the field of missile development. That campaign, which was dubbed Operation Paperclip, is now considered the essence of immoral, inhumane conduct, which ignored the crimes against humanity the candidates had committed.
It is becoming clear that the liberal President Obama did not learn from history, and in complete contradiction of his saintly statements, effectively gave a green light to an entire web of ongoing crimes, based on his perception - ridiculous in itself - that it was in America's national interest to do so.
To sum up, Obama not only refrained from taking action against the ruler of Syria when he crossed all the red lines that had been drawn on chemical warfare but also contributed - if indirectly - to Assad building up his chemical arsenal and deploying it against his own civilian population. Obama deserved a Nobel Prize for his Machiavellian, opportunistic and immoral conduct, which also hurt the security of the U.S.'s partner, Israel.
If you no longer wish to receive messages from Truth Provider, please click here to unsubscribe.Please enter UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.