Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Vehi SheAmda. Our Response? Return and Renew Our Covenant with Hashem! msg from Chief Rabbi of South Africa. Cry Out and Expose Obama .....and Jewish Leaders who assist him

 
bs"d
  
Dear Chavrei Knesset, Rabbanim and Print Media,

 
Vehi SheAmda.... Yaakov Shweky.... Message of the Chief Rabbi of South Africa,
 
Translated: And it is this [covenant] that has stood for our Forefathers and us. For not just one enemy stands (present tense, changed from Haggadah text 'stood', past tense) against us to wipe us out. But in every generation there have been those who have stood against us to wipe us out, and the Holy One Blessed Be He saves us from their hands.
 
 
Patronizing the Palestinians http://www.youtube.com/embed/TzCIckbZKUs?feature=player_embedded and Israel has been afraid to take a stand against Obama and his reelection and Obama's anti Israel nominations out of fear of "interfering" with America's election process?  I fear much worse things.   Hagel, Brennan and Kerry all support and empower Israel's enemies who publicly call out for Israel's destruction".  How can we be silent and foolish to allow Obama to drill a hole in "his" cabin on our ship?
 
So in order that we learn the correct way to stand resolutely with uprightness and justifiably "interfere", Obama shows us the way. He tells us that Israel is working against her own interest towards her own destruction which is of course the exact opposite if we listen to him 
 
Yes! Let's  finally begin to interfere with America's elected officials and work to impeach this Obama, a Nazi empowerer  and American imposter (and I don't use these words lightly) (His empowerment of Edrogen, Ahmadinahjad, Afghan rebel terrorists that support al Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood Morsi who says Jews come from Apes and pigs and the infiltration of radical Islam and Muslim Brotherhood in his administration in our midst and his zealousness for gun control is sufficient proof for these serious allegations! and if you still need further proof check out  Metamorphosis (1 picture = 1000 words)http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2013/01/fwd-metamorphosis-1-picture-1000-words.html
 
 It is our lives, Israel, America etc. at stake!.....We can not be SILENT!
 
  • Netanyahu was quiet and did not express opposition to the reelection of Obama nor endorse Republican candidate ) (didn't want to interfere in American elections) and is silent about Obama's choice of nominations: Hagel, Kerry and Brennan (does not want to interfere with American politics),
    • Feiglin is quiet about Obama and demolition of Settlement Outposts under Netanyahu yet talks of Jewish values and faith but not Torah. (Hopefully next time, Moshe Feiglin will get his own bullet with a bigger font when he is not a subordinate)
  • Naftali Bennett is quiet about Obama nominations of Hagel, Kerry and Brennan though he is quite vocal against taking aid from America.  He is quiet about Israel's Covenant and is unwilling to annex all of Judea and Samaria.  If we speak about our Covenant, we can not annull even a small part of G-d's Torah. Even the Jordan is Palestine paradigm solution is not a solution nor consistent with Torah since the East Bank of the River Jordan is not supposed to be an Islamic terror state.   It is supposed to be the inheritance of Reuvein Gad and part of Shevet Menasheh.  If the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is replaced with a terror Palestinian State, Israel's borders are seriously in danger.
 
Our response must be to Return to and Renew out Covenant "Zocher Habrit" and unite the right parties and speak out strongly for G-d's Covenent with Israel to inherit the Land and settle the Land including all of Judea and Samaria and against OBAMA and his policies and nominations.  How dare we allow him to defy's G-d's will and the Torah!!! We have no other option but to defy his arrogance.
 
If Aipac, Israel's lobby is quiet about anti Israel nominations how can we expect our Senators to be more pro Israel than Israel itself? In this case the silence of Aipac seriously weakens support for Israel in Congress. Is it no surprise that Schumer a Jew, endorses Hagel?
Obama now has a perfect Jewish scapegoat, Lew,  when the economy goes from bad to worse he can always blame it on the Jew and an Orthodox one, noch besser.
 
 
How did Hitler succeed in rounding up the Jews without serious protest?  He enlisted the Jews to help him.  Ideally, a local Judenrat was to include Rabbis and other influential people of their local Jewish community. Thus, enforcement of laws could be better facilitated by the German authorities by using established Jewish authority figures and personages, while undermining external influences. For example in Salonika in Turkey the deportations were organized with the assistance of the Jedenrat or Jewish Council headed by Chief Rabbi Zvi Koretz, who appointed the president of the council in December.  1942. In occupied Europe, the Nazis entrusted Jewish officials with the task of making such lists of Jews along with information about the property they owned. The Judenräte also directed the Jewish police to assist the Germans in catching Jews and loading them onto transport trains leaving for concentration camps. In her book, Arendt wrote that: "To a Jew this role of the Jewish leaders in the destruction of their own people is undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the whole dark
 

 

 

 
 
 
--
Sincerely,
 
Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.
 
Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 
 
 
Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Fwd: Metamorphosis (1 picture = 1000 words)

 

 


 

Metamorphosis (1 picture = 1000 words)

Make you think!

 

Makes you think!

 IRAN 1970
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
IRAN 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AFGHANISTAN
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EGYPT (Cairo University)  1959
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EGYPT (Cairo University2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam)  1980
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
... and some people still do not see a reason  to worry ?!?!?
 
 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 



-
 
    


 "A smile is a curve that sets everything straight."
 חיוך הוא עקומה שמגדירה כל ישר

   


 
 



--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

From Israel: "Speechless" Arlene Kushner Jan 15, 2013


bs"d
 
January 15, 2012
 
"Speechless"
 
It isn't often that I am rendered  speechless, and even when that happens, I am likely to recover my words in short order.
 
Although, when I write that I'm speechless now, I do not mean it literally: It's rhetorical.  More that I cannot quite wrap my head around what I know -- which comes at me, day by day, with ever greater clarity and certainty.  For it is both incredible and terrifying.  And so I search for the words that will bring the message home.
 
I am referring, my friends, to is the situation in the US and the ramifications of that situation.  
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Please, pay careful attention to what Frank Gaffney Jr, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, has just written (all emphasis added):

"Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly declared that 'a world without America is not only desirable, it is achievable.'  While that sentiment won't be embraced in President Obama's inaugural address next week, all other things being equal, it seems likely to be the practical effect of his second term.

"Of course, Iran's regime seeks a world literally without America... . 

"For his part, Barack Obama seems to have in mind bringing about a world without America in a geo-strategic sense." 

Gaffney then quotes political analyst Mark Steyn, who refers to a "fundamental transformation" of America's place in the world, evidently intended, says Gaffney, "to be the President's second-act..." after a first act that focused on the domestic. 

"That agenda is strongly evident in Mr. Obama's choices for key national security cabinet positions: John Kerry at the State Department, Chuck Hagel at Defense and John Brennan at the CIA.  The three are, like the President, imbued with a post-American, post-sovereignty, post-constitutional, transnationalist outlook.  In his administration, it would appear that their mission would be, as the American Enterprise Institute's Danielle Pletka puts it, to manage the United States' decline.

"Having addressed previously in this space the serious problems with the judgment, records and policy proclivities of Messrs. Hagel (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/17/hagel-a-dangerous-choice-for-defense/) and Kerry (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/2/hold-kerry-accountable-senate-should-not-gloss-ove/), let's consider those of John Brennan to further illustrate the syndrome.

Brennan is a textbook example of a U.S. official who has 'gone native.'  He speaks Arabic and was formerly the top CIA officer in Saudi Arabia.  He has shown himself to be deeply sympathetic to Islamists -- for example, excusing and dissembling about their commitment to jihad and the necessity of not offending them.

"After President Obama himself, John Brennan is, arguably, the single most important enabler of the Islamic supremacists' agenda in government today. In his role as Homeland Security Advisor to the President... Brennan has helped legitimate, empower, fund, arm and embolden them abroad, and embraced and appeased them here at home.

"Of particular concern is the fact that John Brennan has presided over: the policy of engaging the Muslim Brotherhood, which has consequently been portrayed by a politicized intelligence community as 'largely secular' and 'eschewing violence'; the shredding of training briefings and the proscribing of trainers that might upset Muslims by telling the truth about shariah and the jihad it commands; the penetration of U.S. agencies by Muslim Brotherhood-associated individuals as employees and/or senior advisors; and misrepresentations to Congress about the true, jihadist character of the attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi last September 11th.

"Of particular concern is the prospect that Team Obama's second-term team will, if confirmed, be even more insistent than their predecessors on engaging Iran.  Make no mistake about it:  The practical effect will be to buy the regime in Tehran the last few months it evidently needs to achieve what it has sought for decades: the means to have the world not only bereft of America's leadership and stabilizing force, but to neutralize and perhaps eliminate the United States as a 21st Century society."

http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p19181.xml

~~~~~~~~~~

If this does not make your blood run cold, or make it difficult for you to catch your breath, you're not getting it.  Frank Gaffney is a very reputable and knowledgeable commentator and he knows full well whereof he speaks.  Dismiss this at your own peril, and the peril of the US.
 
And that leads me to the second reason that I am (rhetorically) speechless: Most Americans don't get it.  I know this because they voted for Obama a second time in spite of the evidence: Much was written well before the election about such alarming situations as the infiltration into the government of Muslim-brotherhood associated individuals.  But very few were listening. 
 
And I know because the American people are not marching in the streets by the millions.
 
There is a shrugging, and a turning of the head.  There are pathetic comments like, "I may not agree with Hagel but the president needs to nominate someone he's comfortable with."  (This from Congressman Peter King.)  There is a reluctance to take on a battle that might sour the relationship with the president.  (This from American Jewish leadership, which is comprised in the main of court Jews.)
 
In the end, only Americans can save America, and I am not at all convinced that it is going to happen.
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Gaffney further says:

"The Senate's constitutional responsibility to confirm senior executive branch appointees is one of the few it hasn't compromised, or allowed the president to expropriate.  It must exercise its authority to assure "quality control" with respect to his picks for top national security cabinet posts.

"Indeed, the fact that President Obama seeks not one or two, but three individuals who share his determination to achieve the radical and dangerous national security transformation he seeks in his second term demands that Senators defy him.  After all, should the Senate fail to object to this trajectory by rigorously debating and defeating any -- and preferably all -- of these problematic choices, its members risk not only allowing, but becoming party to, the realization of a world without America."

Don't let your Senators off the hook.  Let them know hear from you on this:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

And share this posting, share it, share it!

~~~~~~~~~~

What further renders me speechless (and for all my very deep love and concern for America, this is perhaps the worst) are the implications that must be faced within the Western democratic world of what it means that America is imploding.  The agenda of Iran and Islamists more broadly is being advanced, and the security of those democracies is being rendered more vulnerable.
 
A 154-page report authored by five non-proliferation experts in the US-- "US Nonproliferation Strategy for the Changing Middle East" -- is about to be released. It says that Iran may produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one or more nuclear bombs by mid-2014.  And it recommends that the US and its allies should intensify sanctions on Tehran before that point is reached. It further recommends that:
 
"The president should explicitly declare that he will use military force to destroy Iran's nuclear program if Iran takes additional decisive steps toward producing a bomb." 
 
 
But Obama has nominated as Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, a man who not only does not believe in military action against Iran, he does not support sanctions and favors instead "negotiations."
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Obama has made statements innumerable times about the fact that he would not let Iran reach nuclear capability. This was usually in the context of making sure Israel didn't attack Iran -- as in, "trust me to take care of it."   Who could believe this now?  Who can trust Obama?
 
Of course, he also said he has Israel's back.  Lots of Jews loved that, which was his goal, of course. Is there a single Jew now who would be willing to come to Jerusalem and look me in the eye and tell me that he or she truly believes Obama has our back??
 
But apparently, this duplicity is not considered sufficiently important to merit raising of voices -- or marching in the streets.
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
PM Netanyahu says that in his next term he is going to focus on Iran.  I take issue with him on some things, but here he is spot-on.  Brave, in my book, and determined. And the only leader in the world with his eyes open, it seems. 
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
Obama has moved past re-election mode and is now into "legacy" mode, which means he worries about achieving successes that he can be remembered for.  Irrationally, he still apparently thinks achieving some sort of successful Israeli-Palestinian Arab negotiations may be possible.  And to that end, he's been complaining about Netanyahu's readiness to build in Jewish communities (otherwise referred to as "settlements") in Judea and Samaria: he actually has the unmitigated gall to say that "Israel doesn't know its own best interests." 
 
 
Considering that he's bringing his own country down, I guess this, too, leaves me speechless.
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
For the record, ISRAEL -- a sovereign state with a democratically elected government -- will decide what is in Israel's best interests.
 
And this is what our prime minister says (emphasis added:

"In the Middle East, the real Middle East, any territory that we evacuate will be captured by Iran. The stronger we are, the more we will be able to guarantee our future and make peace with our neighbors."

 
Amen to this!
 
~~~~~~~~~~
 
© Arlene KushnerThis material is produced by Arlene Kushner, functioning as an independent journalist. Permission is granted for it to be reproduced only with proper attribution. 
 
If it is reproduced and emphasis is added, the fact that it has been added must be noted.

 
See my website at www.arlenefromisrael.info  Contact Arlene at akushner18@gmail.com
 
This material is transmitted by Arlene only to persons who have requested it or agreed to receive it. If you are on the list and wish to be removed, contact Arlene and include your name in the text of the message.   
 



--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Obama: Some Gun Control Measures I Can Accomplish Through Executive Action. Second Amendment - the right to bear arms

Obama: Some Gun Control Measures 'I Can Accomplish Through Executive Action...', Video, You Tube

From: Paul Eidelberg <foundation612.12@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:24:33 +0200
To: Paul Eidelberg<paul@i-ari.org>
Subject: Second Amendment

The Second Amendment

Extracts from Wikipedia

A foundation of American political thought during the Revolutionary period was the well justified concern about political corruption and governmental tyranny. Even the federalists, fending off their opponents who accused them of creating an oppressive regime, were careful to acknowledge the risks of tyranny. Against that backdrop, the framers saw the personal right to bear arms as a potential check against tyranny. Theodore Sedgwick of Massachusetts expressed this sentiment by declaring that it is "a chimerical idea to suppose that a country like this could ever be enslaved . . . Is it possible . . . that an army could be raised for the purpose of enslaving themselves or their brethren? or, if raised whether they could subdue a nation of freemen, who know how to prize liberty and who have arms in their hands?" Noah Webster similarly argued:

Before a standing army can rule the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States.

George Mason argued the importance of the militia and right to bear arms by reminding his compatriots of England's efforts "to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them . . . by totally disusing and neglecting the militia." He also clarified that under prevailing practice the militia included all people, rich and poor. "Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." Because all were members of the militia, all enjoyed the right to individually bear arms to serve therein.

The framers thought the personal right to bear arms to be a paramount right by which other rights could be protected. Therefore, writing after the ratification of the Constitution, but before the election of the first Congress, James Monroe included "the right to keep and bear arms" in a list of basic "human rights", which he proposed to be added to the Constitution.

Patrick Henry, in the Virginia ratification convention June 5, 1788, argued for the dual rights to arms and resistance to oppression:

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.

While both Monroe and Adams supported ratification of the Constitution, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, he confidently contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he contemptuously described as "afraid to trust the people with arms." He assured his fellow citizens that they need never fear their government because of "the advantage of being armed...."

By January of 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several specific amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to amendments to assure ratification. Samuel Adams proposed that the Constitution:

Be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms.

Tuesday, January 08, 2013

Also Ask Lawmakers in Congress to oppose confirming Brennan as CIA Director, dangerous to America and Israel like Kerry and Hagel - Obama's choices....

bs"d
 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Jew Hatred in Europe, America is no longer the Safe Haven it once was. Vote NO on Hagel and Kerry!

BS"D
 
Jew Hatred in Europe: 

America Next?

During  relaunch of Congress.org last week, the requirement that you register and log in every time you want to write your lawmakers was removed..

Now, all you need to do is click on the words "Join the conversation, Write Your Lawmakers" in the upper-right corner of the site.

Or, you can click on the link below to be taken to a form to write all of your federal representatives at one time.

Write all your federal representatives at one time

 
Or you can go directly on their websites.
For those outside of NYC, the first url will take you to the site where you can access your own senators.
 
 
SAMPLE LETTER
We feel very strongly that the records of both Mr Kerry and Mr Hagel, are not compatible with our best interests. Please do not vote in favor of their ratification, which would be a blow to the security of all Americans as well as that of our allies!
Respectfully,

-------------------
 
 
 
 
Sincerely,
 
Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.
 
Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 
 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Contact Congress

bs"d
 
I've been using this new Web site to learn what Congress is up to and send messages to my representatives. It's called Congress.org.
 
 
Or you can go directly on their websites.
 
For those outside of NYC, the first url will take you to the site where you can access your own senators.
 
 
 
 
 
SAMPLE LETTER
 
We feel very strongly that the records of both Mr Kerry and Mr Hagel, are not compatible with our best interests.  Please do not vote in favor of their ratification, which would be a blow to the security of all Americans as well as that of our allies!
 
Respectfully,

-------------------
 
 

Fwd: Call your Representatives - Vote NO on Kerry & Hagel


bs"d
Americans for a Safe Israel
 
Americans For a Safe Israel
1751 Second Avenue (91st Street)
New York, NY 10128
Contact: Helen Freedman, Executive Director
January 7, 2013

 

 

 

This weekend we received the unpleasant news about the sale of Al Gore's Current TV, on Dec. 31, just under the tax deadline, for many millions of dollars, to the Al-Queda, Hamas news organ, Al-Jazeera. We have three Al's in a row here. Is anyone surprised? Dismayed, yes, but surprised? (By the way - we have a strong recommendation from an AFSI member who encourages viewers to watch JLTV and subscribe to: www.tin.tv.) If some are surprised, consider the invasion of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama White House. Does that surprise us? See Frank Gaffney, Steve Emerson, Brigitte Gabriel on this subject for graphic details. And now we have confirmed that the "in-your-face" nomination of Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense is going forward, as well as the John Kerry nomination for Secretary of State. Again, no surprises. Don't say we didn't warn you. See below and CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES ASAP REQUESTING THAT THEY SAY NO TO THE NOMINATIONS OF KERRY & HAGEL, BAD FOR BOTH AMERICA AND ISRAEL: 202-224-3121.

 

 

Where does U.S. Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), stand on foreign policy matters pertaining to Israel and the Middle East? Below are the highlights of 10 letters signed by large majorities of the U.S. Senate, noting whether Kerry signed or not.  Letters and signatories obtained from the archives of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. 


CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSMAN  CONTACT YOUR SENATOR   

http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/12/31/john-kerrys-record-on-israel%E2%80%94in-letters/

  
DECEMBER 2012
Letter: Urging further pressure on Iran and asking President Obama to reiterate his readiness to exercise a military option if necessary
Number of signatories: 74
Kerry: Did not sign
 
SEPTEMBER 2012
Letter: Urging the European Union to designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization
Number of signatories: 75
Kerry: Did not sign
 
JUNE 2012
Letter: Supporting Israel's right to self-defense and affirming that Israel's naval blockade is legal following the Gaza flotilla incident
Number of signatories: 87
Kerry: Did not sign
 
APRIL 2010
Letter: Stressing the need for "direct, face-to-face negotiations without preconditions on either side" for Israelis and Palestinians and affirming the "unbreakable bonds that tie the United States and Israel together"
Number of signatories: 87
Kerry: Did not sign
 
APRIL 2010
Letter: Calling for crippling sanctions against Iran
Number of signatories: 81
Kerry: Did not sign
 
NOVEMBER 2009
Letter: Supporting a strong international affairs budget for fiscal year 2010, including security assistance for Israel
Number of signatories: 58
Kerry: Signed and initiated
 
AUGUST 2009
Letter: Supporting President Obama's effort to encourage Arab states to normalize relations with Israel
Signatories: 71
Kerry: Did not sign
MAY 2009
Letter: "Peace Principles" letter stating that "every effort should be made" to realize peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors, and insisting on "absolute Palestinian commitment to ending terrorist violence and to building the institutions necessary for a viable Palestinian state living side-by-side, in peace with the Jewish state of Israel"
Number of signatories: 76
Kerry: Signed
 
JUNE 2008
Letter: Reiterating Israel's right to self-defense, calling on the U.S. to stand strongly with Israel at the UN, and urging pressure on Arab states to do more to support Israeli-Palestinian talks
Number of signatories: 77
Kerry: Signed
 
MARCH 2007
Letter: Request for "no direct aid and no contacts with any members of a Palestinian Authority that does not explicitly and unequivocally recognize Israel's right to exist, renounce terror, and accept previous agreements"
Number of signatories: 79
Kerry: Did not sign
 
JUNE 2005
Letter: Expressing support for Israel's disengagement plan from Gaza, calling disengagement a chance for Palestinian leadership "to prove to the world and, more importantly, its own people, that it is capable of governing"
Number of signatories: 73
Kerry: Signed
 
DEC 2005
Not content to smear only the Commander-in-Chief, Senator Kerry also accused U.S. servicemen of "terrorizing" the Iraqi people. On December 4, 2005, he told Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation: "And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women ."
 
In recent years, as columnist Arnold Ahlert has so aptly written, Kerry "has been the federal government's highest-ranking apologist for Syrian President Bashar Assad." Indeed it was Kerry who repeatedly tried to undermine the Bush administration's efforts to isolate the dictator. Under Obama, Kerry has pursued with renewed vigor his impulse to engage Assad. During a January 2009 visit to Damascus, for instance, the Senatorlistened attentively to Assad's admonition that Washington must "move away from a policy based on dictating decisions" to Syria. Kerry, in turn, said: "Unlike the Bush administration that believed you could simply tell people what to do and walk away and wait for them to do it, we believe you have to engage in a discussion." In April 2010, Kerry again met with Assad and called Syria "an essential player in bringing peace and stability to the region."
Forty-thousand dead bodies later, one tries vainly to reconcile John Kerry's track record with President Obama's glowing description of him as the "perfect choice" for Secretary of State. One can only ponder with trepidation what dark days lay ahead for America with this hate-America veteran taking the reins at the State Department.
KERRY'S VIETNAM DAYS
From sailors that served honorably on the coast and rivers of Nam with John Kerry who have no respect for him at all. They said John arrived at Cam Ranh Bay and told people he was going to follow in JFK's footsteps, his hero, and win the Navy Cross and be president someday. He only served on a Swift boat three months and put himself in for three Purple Hearts and never spent one day in a hospital. This is a disgrace to the men that were WIA and deserved the award.
After being discharged from the Navy in early 1970, Kerry joined Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) and became a major figure in the so-called "peace" movement, whose hallmarks were a deep wellspring of hatred for the United States coupled with sympathy for America's Communist enemy. In May 1970, Kerry, without government authorization, met personally with North Vietnamese and Viet Cong delegations in Paris to discuss a list of "peace" proposals enumerated by Nguyen Thi Madame Binh, the top Viet Cong delegate to the Paris Peace talks. In the aftermath of that illegal meeting, Kerry strongly advised the U.S. Senate to accept Binh's proposals.
At that time, Kerry himself acknowledged that his visit to Paris was "on the borderline" of legality. Actually, it extended far beyond that "borderline." A federal law known as the Uniform Code of Military Justice prescribed severe punishment (including, in some cases, the death penalty) for any person who "without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly."
During the ensuing months, Kerry, with increasing stridency, continued to exhort the U.S. to accept the Viet Cong peace proposals. His radical VVAW comrades went so far as to sign a "People's Peace Treaty," whose nine points were all extracted from a list of Viet Cong conditions for ending the war. Kerry fully supportedthis treaty.
On April 22, 1971, Kerry famously testified to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations that many U.S. servicemen in Vietnam had "personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war ." "We learned the meaning of free fire zones," added Kerry. "Shooting anything that moves, and we watched while America placed a cheapness on the lives of Orientals." Moreover, Kerry emphasized that America's "war crimes" in Southeast Asia were "not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command."
Army reports that were unearthed decades later resoundingly discredited the claims of Kerry and his fellow VVAW members, proving those claims to be essentially a pack of lies. When Kerry was running for U.S. President in 2004, the publication U.S. Veteran Dispatch noted that Kerry's 1971 Senate testimony had "occurred while some of his fellow Vietnam veterans were known by the world to be enduring terrible suffering as prisoners of war in North Vietnamese prisons." Similarly, retired General George S. Patton IIIcharged that Kerry's actions had given "aid and comfort to the enemy." And the organization Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry stated:
"As a national leader of VVAW, Kerry campaigned against the effort of the United States to contain the spread of Communism. He used the blood of servicemen still in the field for his own political advancement by claiming that their blood was being shed unnecessarily or in vain.. Under Kerry's leadership, VVAW members mocked the uniform of United States soldiers by wearing tattered fatigues marked with pro-communist graffiti. They dishonored America by marching in demonstrations under the flag of the Viet Cong enemy."
Yet today, this same John Kerry has been nominated to serve as Secretary of State for the same nation he trashed so relentlessly in the '70s. Only in America.
After graduating law school, working in a district attorney's office, and serving a brief stint as Massachusetts' lieutenant governor, Kerry was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1984. Just a few months later-on April 18, 1985-Kerry and fellow Democratic Senator Tom Harkin traveled to Nicaragua to meet with President Daniel Ortega, whose Communist Sandinista government had strong ties to the Soviet Union and Cuba. Through Kerry and Harkin, President Ortega offered a cease-fire agreement on the condition that the Reagan Administration stop aiding the rebel Contras who were then at war with the Sandinistas. Reagan rejected the offer as a transparent "propaganda initiative" designed to influence an upcoming House vote on a $14 million Contra-aid package, but Kerry said: "I am willing . to take the risk in the effort to put to test the good faith of the Sandinistas." The House of Representatives ultimately voted against the Contra aid. The following day, Ortega flew to Moscow to accept a $200 million loan from the Soviets. Presumably this was one of the many "major foreign policy debates" in which, by President Obama's reckoning, Kerry had so impressively distinguished himself.
Unchastened by the evidence of his own poor judgment, Kerry in 1986 supported a "fast for life" initiative by four U.S. military veterans protesting President Reagan's "illegal and extraordinarily vicious wars against the poor of Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala." Also in the 1980s, Senator Kerry hired Gareth Porter, a former fellow of the consistently pro-Soviet Institute for Policy Studies, as a legislative aide. And in 2002, Kerry sent his warm greetings to a major gathering of the Democratic Socialists of America's Boston chapter.
Kerry's next opportunity to distinguish himself as a man of exceedingly poor character was furnished by the conflict in Iraq. Initially, Kerry voted to authorize the use of military force against Saddam Hussein, a position the Senator based on his firm conviction-which he publicly articulated on numerous occasions-that Saddam was aggressively seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction. During the weeks and months leading up to the March 2003 U.S. invasion, for example, Kerry made the following statements:
* "It would be naive to the point of great danger not to believe that, left to his own devices, Saddam Hussein will misjudge, provoke and stumble into a future, more dangerous confrontation with the civilized world. He has as much as promised it."
* "If Saddam Hussein is unwilling to bend to the international community's already existing order, then he will have invited enforcement ."
* "Without question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal and murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. And we all know the litany of his offenses."
* "People have forgotten that for seven and a half years, we found weapons of mass destruction [in Iraq]. We were destroying weapons of mass destruction."
But as the political winds shifted, Kerry and his fellow congressional Democrats began to portray, with ever-growing frequency, the Iraq War as a foreign-policy debacle that had been launched hastily and without justifiable cause.
FOR THE LOVE OF AMERICA KERRY IS AN EMBARASSMENT
KERRY'S LIST OF SHAME MUST SINK HIS SELECTION FOR SECRETARY OF STATE.
>Early 1970, Kerry joined Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW)
> May 1970, Kerry, without government authorization, met personally (illegally) with North Vietnamese and Viet Cong delegations in Paris to discuss a list of "peace" proposals; violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice
>April 22, 1971, Kerry famously testified to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations that many U.S. servicemen in Vietnam had "personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians,

razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war ."


> As a national leader of VVAW, Kerry campaigned against the effort of the United States to contain the spread of Communism.
>1984. Kerry was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1984. Just a few months later-on April 18, 1985-Kerry and fellow Democratic Senator Tom Harkin traveled to Nicaragua to meet with President Daniel Ortega, whose Communist Sandinista government had strong ties to the Soviet Union and Cuba.
>1986. supported a "fast for life" initiative by four U.S. military veterans protesting President Reagan's "illegal and extraordinarily vicious wars against the poor of Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala."Also
>In the1980s. Senator Kerry hired Gareth Porter, a former fellow of the consistently pro-SovietInstitute for Policy Studies, as a legislative aide.
>2002, Kerry sent his warm greetings to a major gathering of the Democratic Socialists of America's Boston chapter.
>pre-2003. Kerry said, Saddam was aggressively seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction.
>pre-2003 Kerry said, people have forgotten that for seven and a half years, we found weapons of mass destruction [in Iraq]. We were destroying weapons of mass destruction.
>2004, Kerry charged that President Bush had not only "misled the American people" about the threat posed by Saddam, but also had "arbitrarily" decided that the "time for diplomacy is over" and "rushed our nation to war."
>December 4, 2005. Kerry told Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation: "And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women ."

 

FOR THE LOVE OF ISRAEL & AMERICA- WRITE or Call YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVE TO VOTE AGAINST CHUCK HAGEL  

CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSMAN  CONTACT YOUR SENATOR  


CHUCK HAGEL IS JUST AGAINST ISRAEL ON KEY FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES!!!  Chuck Hagel is arguably the most hostile anti-Israel senator ever to serve in the U.S. Senate. His record features a laundry list of anti-Israel actions that include his failure to sign a bipartisan letter to the European Union to add Hezbollah to its list of terrorist organizations. He was one of only a handful of Senators who refused to sign the letter.  Chuck Hagel currently serves as Chairman of the Atlantic Council, a foreign policy blog. On December 11, 2012 the Atlantic Council published a front page article titled "Israel's Apartheid Policy."
 
- Caroline Glick writes: "In Hagel, he chose someone even more outspoken in his animus towards the Jewish state than Obama.
 
- Nebraska Jews Recall Senator Chuck Hagel as "Unfriendly" and "Unmovable" on Israel, "Didn't Give a Damn About the Jewish Community"
 
- Hagel had recently appeared before an Arab group, where he'd boasted that his support for Israel wasn't "automatic."
- 2008, Mr. Hagel and John Kerry co-authored an op-ed in this newspaper titled "It's Time to Talk to Syria"
- In 2006, Mr. Hagel described Israel's war against Hezbollah as "the systematic destruction of an American friend, the country and people of Lebanon."
- "Hagel was one of only four senators who refused to sign a letter expressing support for Israel during the second Palestinian intifada"
- In 2002, a year in which 457 Israelis were killed in terrorist attacks (a figure proportionately equivalent to more than 20,000 fatalities in the U.S., or seven 9/11s), Mr. Hagel weighed in with the advice that "Israel must take steps to show its commitment to peace." This was two years after Yasser Arafat had been offered a state by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak at Camp David.
- Hagel was one of only two U.S. senators who voted against renewing the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act
- Hagel didn't sign all of those nonbinding letters from the AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), justifiably calling them "stupid."
- He voted for the Iran Nonproliferation Act
- Hagel wants a weaker stance than most other senators against the terrorists in

Iran and Syria and the West Bank and Gaza and against those who help the terrorists."


 
- In 2001, when 87 members of the Senate sent President Bush a letter saying Yasser Arafat should not be invited to meet with high-level officials in Washington and faulting the Palestinian Arabs for using violence against Israel, Hagel were among those who failed to sign.
 
- Hagel had met at Damascus in 1998 "with the terror-sponsoring dictator, Hafez Al-Assad, and returned to tell a reporter about the meeting, "Peace comes through dealing with people.  Peace doesn't come at the end of a bayonet or the end of a gun."
+ He co-sponsored resolutions opposing any unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state and praising Israel's efforts "in the face of terrorism, hostility and belligerence by many of her neighbors."
+ He also co-sponsored legislation urging the international community "to avoid contact with and refrain from supporting the terrorist organization Hamas until it agrees to recognize Israel, renounce violence, disarm and accept prior agreements."
What we're seeing as Obama floats the name of Senator Hagel for secretary of defense is a glimpse of his true views on the Jewish state.
 
"Be at war with your vices, at peace with your neighbors, and let every new year find you a better man."
 
Benjamin Franklin

 The best way to send a message to the detractors of Israel in the media, the Administration, and the public is by joining AFSI and becoming active with AFSI's work.  As a member, you will receive all our email alerts as well as email copies of our renowned monthly publication, The Outpost.  See past editions.  

 

Visit us on Facebook & Twitter   

Like us on Facebook  Follow us on Twitter
 
Visit Our Website
www.afsi.org


 

computer mouse

Forward to a Friend
This email was sent to faigerayzel@gmail.com by afsi@rcn.com |  
AFSI | 1751 Second Ave. @ 91st Street | New York | NY | 10128



--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Tuesday, January 01, 2013

Fwd:Now Panel Discussion live broadcast שידור חיי Links to live Hebrew and live English translation



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: nashim.beyarok@ womeningreen.org.il <eli7@womeningreen.org.il>
Date: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:43 AM
Subject: live broadcast שידור חיי
To: "nashim.beyarok@ womeningreen.org.il" <eli7@womeningreen.org.il>


We are happy to announce that

The 3rd Annual Conference on the Application of Israeli
Sovereignty over Judea and Samaria

 

Will be broadcast Live in Hebrew and English on Arutz 7

http://www.inn.co.il/

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/

Starting at 18:30 israel time

Join us!

Yudit Katzover and Nadia Matar

 

 

אנו שמחות להודיע כי

 

כנס החלת הריבונות על יהודה ושומרון השנתי השלישי

ישודר בשידור חי בערוץ 7, בעברית ובאנגלית

http://www.inn.co.il/

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/

החל מהשעה 18:30, שעון ישראל

הצטרפו אלינו!

נדיה מתר ויהודית קצובר

 

 

 

 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nashimbyarok" group. This group is owned and operated by Women In Green For Israel's Tomorrow.
 
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nashimbyarok-womeningreen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
 
Visit our website at http://www.womeningreen.org
 
 
 



--
Sincerely,

Robin Ticker
Activist emails sent to my list  are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan)  a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.

Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com 

Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog. 

Fwd: שידור-חי עכשיו Link to Live broadcast NOW! Conference Judea and Samaria Sovereignty

bs"d
 
Here is the link.  Thank you Chaya Witkin for sending.
שידור-חי כנס למען שליטה ב-יהודה-שומרון: בעברית:
 
Live conference - Judea & Samaria Sovereignity: simultaneous translation to English:
 
Baruch.
 
Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog.