Bsd
Updated with this related post by Ari Zivotovsky in The Jerusalem Post
Green-lighting torture in Israel: A tragic, unifying court decision - comment
By ARI ZIVOTOFSKY
Published: SEPTEMBER 5, 2022 03:12
----------
This week we have witnessed compromised politically corrupted courts in United States of America and in Israel.
This week's Torah reading was Parshat Shoftim. Setting up righteous courts.
Truth and Justice is the key to redemption.
In Israel: This week Amiram ben Ulliel appeal verdict is that he is condemned to life in prison for a crime he never committed, allegedly for perpetrating an arson terrorist act in 2015 in the Arab village of Duma.
Allegedly this Breslev Chosid, married with a baby, walked several kilometers into the Arab village in Duma, threw a Molotov cocktail at an empty house wrote Hebrew graffiti נקמה and יחי המלך.
He allegedly saw noone died, so he then threw another Molotov cocktail at another house, the Dawabshe family which started a fire snd killed the parents and one kid.
Amiran ben Uliel, Breslev Chosid whose handwriting didn't match the graffiti and is not a Kahanist nor a Chabad Chosid and didn't scribble Na, Na Nachman and isn't the macho type and does not fit the profile of a terrorist, managed to walk back to his Jewish Settlement several kilometers without anyone noticing him.
How plausible is this?
If he hated Arabs so much, why didn't he just pick a random Arab house next to his Yishuv if all he wanted to do was kill innocent Arabs?
That's too logical.
Seems like an obvious question? Did anyone ask him?
Unless of course he was suicidal.
Amiram didn't cooperate with the investigation for many days. I think 17 days. He never bragged about murdering innocent dead Arabs and his parents surely never educated him to kill innocent Arabs either... unlike some Terrorist Arabs who are taught Jihad.
But Shabaq really needed a scapegoat. They tried very hard to get Meir Ettinger, Rabbi Kahana's grandson who probably understood Shabaq's agenda and understood who he was dealing with, and went on a hunger strike. He knew what his grandfather went through. Tens of other hilltop youth were placed under administrative detention at the time as well and interrogated, denied habeas corpus, denied attorneys during investigation and denied juvenile and civil rights. Trauma big time for many innocent kids and their families
Shabaq needed desperately to come up with a Jewish Terrorist scapegoat.
After all within 24 hours and days of the Duma arson, with no investigation to speak of, the Prime Minister, the Defense Minister, political big shots followed soon by tons of Yesha Rabbis, publicly condemned this terrible arson and distanced themselves from the extremist "Jewish" perpetrators, which was a given, from their very limited knowledge and understanding coming from the Jewish Division of Terror of the Shabaq.
With no investigation to speak of, why were all so convinced Jews were the perpetrators.
Of course you think! Hebrew graffiti!!!!
And a desired political narrative....
Can innocent Jews be framed today? Like blood libels of days gone by?
Is it happenstance this happened in a place called Duma?
Duma.
Several months went by, August through December 2015, with no found suspect. The evil forces were yelling and losing patience. Where are those guilty extremist Jews you all condemned? Naftali Bennett as well had an article condemning the fringe Jewish Hilltop youth, front page in the New York Times of all places exactly one week after the Duma arson with no investigation other than the say so of the Jewish Division of Terror of the Shabaq.
Amiram was a vulnerable kid as was another minor A. and Shabaq received permission to use extraordinary measures (torture) to extract confession. No other solid evidence against these guys.
So they confessed.
Who wouldn't?
The kid A, who allegedly was his accomplice got off with a plea bargain. Maybe it was because his parents had big mouths and started telling his story in Jewish Media and speaking tours after a few years when they realized the courts had no interest in finding out the truth and justice. They certainly weren't happy about innocent Arabs dying in the arson but believed their son was totally innocent of the arson in Duma.
Amiram was more vulnerable.
His interrogator during torture was present when he reenacted one of the versions he was told happened during interrogation. Full of loopholes but served the purpose to be blood libeled and a scapegoat of the hilltop Settler Youth. The ideology of the late Rabbi Meir Kahana z"l is considered as the most dangerous enemy of the Government of israel and organizations run by his students and followers are designated as a terrorist organization. See cabinet Communique Match 13,1994.
So now as before, Amiran is sentenced for life, and is "so dangerous" he is not allowed to physically hug his young daughter nor pray with a Minyan on Yom Kippur. Possibly the outcry has allowed him a hug once a week? He has the harshest sentence of any other criminal that I've heard of.
The majority of seekers of truth believe Amiram is an innocent pawn and the evidence points to the fact he was framed by Shabaq's Jewish Division of Terror. The arson of Duma was orchestrated or manipulated by political operatives whereby Amiram was tortured into confessing a crime he never committed.
Who was really responsible for the Duma Massacre in 2015?
May Righteousness and Justice prevail!!!
In America Trump is framed...
Joe Hoft at The Gateway Pundit published this earlier this week… The FBI created a fake crime scene at Mar-a-Lag...
By Jim Hoft
Published September 3, 2022 at 6:35pm
694 Comments
CONFIRMED: As Gateway Pundit Reported — FBI Doctored Mar-a-Lago Photo, Added Their Own Docs that DON'T MATCH INVENTORY REPORTS
Joe Hoft at The Gateway Pundit published this earlier this week…
The FBI created a fake crime scene at Mar-a-Lago by adding their own documents to the scene and doctoring the photo they released in their report and to the press.
As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier — This is against the law.
The DOJ responded in a lawsuit this week to President Trump's request to a Florida Court to review the FBI raid of his iconic property Mar-a-Lago.
TRENDING: LIVE-STREAM VIDEO: President Trump LIVE at Wilkes-Barre, PA in First Rally after Mar-a-Lago Raid and Biden's Moloch Speech --253,000 Watching Live
In the DOJ's response, the DOJ included a document they claim was taken at Mar-a-Lago during their raid.
The photo was all over the news on Wednesday, August 31, the day after it was provided to the court.
The Independent made fun of the Time Magazine cover on the right side of the photo that the DOJ apparently wanted to include in the photo so that they could show that President Trump is so vain. There was no need for this Time Magazine piece in the picture.
The Daily Mail said "Trump KEPT framed Time cover of 'enemies' knocking at his window among the collection of classified files – including documents marked 'Top Secret' and those based on 'human intelligence' – sprawled across Mar-a-Lago".
This was all a lie. The FBI created the crime scene, inserted their own documents, and then photoshopped the document. What a disgrace.
1. We know that the FBI wanted to make this look like a crime scene.
We know this because at the bottom of the photo provided to the court there is the number 2A, indicating that this was a crime scene photo as well as a type of tape measure across the bottom of the photo. The corrupt FBI threw the photos on the floor themselves. They staged this.
We know this because the containers were right next door. The documents would have been placed on a table had the FBI wanted to take a picture of the documents. Showing them as scattered across the floor is for show to indicate they were found this way, a lie we explain below. Also, the cabinets are right next to the documents, which is likely where they were stored. They weren't stored on the floor.
2. The FBI inserted documents into the photo.
The cover sheets in the above photo that were red, yellow, and brown were inserted by the FBI. They are the FBI's cover sheets. We know this for various reasons. The Trump White House did not need these cover sheets in the documents they held because they had their own cover sheets.
Advertisement - story continues below
If you look closely at the photo above, the document right above the 2A is folded back. The papers are stapled together as they should be. If you look at that batch you see there already was a cover sheet on that document. It says "Please store in…". That is the real cover sheet.
The red, yellow, and brown cover sheets were inserted. If you look closely at the yellow cover sheets, they are paper clipped to the documents. The documents would have been stapled. They are paperclipped because they were inserted by the FBI.
Also, the front cover sheet in brown, showing SCI, says the following wording:
Handling, storage, reproduction, and distribution of the attached document must be in accordance with the applicable executive orders statutes and agency implementing regulations.
This document was inserted. The FBI inserted this to indicate that the "agency implementing regulations" – i.e. the DOJ – is involved in the maintenance of these records but this is not the case. The President has the right to documents that are his. They are his property and an inserted document saying something different is simply not true.
3. The photo was altered or photoshopped after it was taken (i.e. the FBI was tampering with evidence).
Throughout the picture there are sections in white. It would be proper for the FBI to take pictures of the crime scene and then add paper to cover up the classified info and then take photos to cover up any classified information. However, we know that these white sections are redactions to the photo.
When looking a the picture above, you can see that the white space was added to the picture by the white outlines around the black boxes in the first photo above. These photos were tampered with.
Finally, did the FBI Agents who invaded the President's home have the proper credentials to review classified information? How about the agents who made the call to photoshop the photo? How about the employees who photoshopped the photos? Were they properly credentialed?
UPDATE — NOW THERE IS MORE CONFIRMATION THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT TOOK PLACE….
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry reported on Friday that:
** There is a major discrepancy between the "detailed property inventory" DOJ filed with the court and the inventory receipt the FBI gave Trump's attorney the day of the search.
** Nowhere on the detailed inventory sheet does it list docs with "Top Secret/SCI documents" as it states on item "2A" of the receipt.
** The photo of "2A" items shows coversheets with "Top Secret/SCI" on them, yet again, the detailed inventory does not account for any SCI material.
** This is the most sensitive classified information requiring reading in a secure SCIF facility.
Paul Sperry: BREAKING: A major discrepancy has surfaced between the "detailed property inventory" DOJ filed with the court and the inventory receipt the FBI gave Trump's attorney the day of the search. Nowhere on the detailed inventory sheet does it list docs with "Top Secret/SCI documents" as it states on item "2A" of the receipt. Also, the photo of "2A" items shows coversheets with "Top Secret/SCI" on them, yet again, the detailed inventory does not account for any SCI material, which is the most sensitive classified information requiring reading in a secure SCIF facility. Was there, in fact, no such material found at Mar-a-Lago? Did DOJ mislead the court — and public — with that staged photo it included as an exhibit?
Via Paul Sperry on GETTR.
If this is indeed the case that the FBI inserted their own documents into the photo, then they created a false crime scene.
They inserted docs. They tampered with evidence. And the FBI broke the law — NOT President Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment