bs"d
From Arnold Roth, father of Malki, 15, murdered in the Sbarro terror attack in Jerusalem, 2001.
Please pass this heartfelt request along urgently to your contacts. It's a request to sign a petition, online here:
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/remove-ahlam-tamimi-from-the-list-of-terrorists-to-be-f.html
Under normal circumstances, requests to sign a petition are unlikely to lead to any significant outcomes. In this case, we are hoping to do something important.
The petition asks for the removal of one specific name from the list of more than one thousand terrorists, including hundreds of convicted murderers, to be published by the government of Israel tomorrow, Sunday. That list is the basis of a transaction by which Israel will get back Gilad Shalit, held hostage by the terrorists of Hamas for more than five years. The deal involves Israel throwing open the gates of its top-security prisons and issuing wholesale pardons. My wife Frimet and I have expressed our principled objection to the deal. While others are busy trying to stop it in the courts, we are focusing our energies on one specific person, and getting her off the list.
Her name is Tamimi. An article in today's New York Times [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/15/world/middleeast/israel-prisoner-swap-touches-old-wounds.html ] provides some background:
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/remove-ahlam-tamimi-from-the-list-of-terrorists-to-be-f.html
Under normal circumstances, requests to sign a petition are unlikely to lead to any significant outcomes. In this case, we are hoping to do something important.
The petition asks for the removal of one specific name from the list of more than one thousand terrorists, including hundreds of convicted murderers, to be published by the government of Israel tomorrow, Sunday. That list is the basis of a transaction by which Israel will get back Gilad Shalit, held hostage by the terrorists of Hamas for more than five years. The deal involves Israel throwing open the gates of its top-security prisons and issuing wholesale pardons. My wife Frimet and I have expressed our principled objection to the deal. While others are busy trying to stop it in the courts, we are focusing our energies on one specific person, and getting her off the list.
Her name is Tamimi. An article in today's New York Times [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/15/world/middleeast/israel-prisoner-swap-touches-old-wounds.html ] provides some background:
Among those is Ahlam Tamimi, a 31-year-old woman who was a key figure in the pizzeria attack. She is often described as the driver of the car that brought the suicide bomber to the Sbarro restaurant and killed 15 people. But the Roths say her role went far beyond that, to the actual planning of the attack. In interviews from prison, Ms. Tamimi, who was a journalist, has told of having brought the suicide bomber to Jerusalem and then going on Palestinian television's afternoon broadcast to announce the news of the attack without acknowledging her involvement. "I'm not sorry for what I did," she told an Israeli news organization in 2006. "I will get out of prison, and I refuse to recognize Israel's existence. Discussions will only take place after Israel recognizes that this is Islamic land."
The Roths said their anger over the prisoner exchange was focused on Ms. Tamimi, who is being sent to Jordan. She is young, fervent and charismatic, Mr. Roth said, and proud of what she did. In a documentary on Palestinian prisoners, she was asked whether she knew how many children had been killed in the attack. She did not. When told the number was eight, she smiled.
There is a fuller background about the circumstances in which our daughter was murdered on the Keren Malki website: http://www.kerenmalki.org/Sbarro_Massacre.htm
And there are many articles on the web tonight showing her family and supporters celebrating her impending return to freedom and to a full and active life as a heroine and inspiration.
Even if you do not normally sign petitions, or pass them along to friends, we ask you to seriously consider signing this one. Once again, it's online here:
להקליק כאן ולחתום http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/remove-ahlam-tamimi-from-the-list-of-terrorists-to-be-f.html
And there are many articles on the web tonight showing her family and supporters celebrating her impending return to freedom and to a full and active life as a heroine and inspiration.
Even if you do not normally sign petitions, or pass them along to friends, we ask you to seriously consider signing this one. Once again, it's online here:
להקליק כאן ולחתום http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/remove-ahlam-tamimi-from-the-list-of-terrorists-to-be-f.html
Time is very limited. We really only have ONE DAY to get a significant number of signatures. If we succeed, we can then put pressure on the Prime Minister's Office and the Justice Ministry and publicize this in the media.
Our blog: http://mattotarim1.blogspot.com Now on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MattotArim
רוצה להימחק מהרשימה? שלח דוא"ל ריק אל mattotarim-unsubscribe@eretz.org
to unsubscribe, pls send a blank email to: mattotarim-unsubscribe@eretz.org
Column One: A pact signed in Jewish blood
By CAROLINE B. GLICK
October 14, 2011
At best, Netanyahu comes out of this deal looking like a weak leader.
At worst, he comes out as a morally challenged, irresponsible,
opportunistic politician.
No one denies the long suffering of the Schalit family. Noam and Aviva
Schalit and their relatives have endured five years and four months of
uninterrupted anguish since their son St.-Sgt. Gilad Schalit was
abducted from his army post by Palestinian terrorists and spirited to
Gaza in June 2006. Since then, aside from one letter and one
videotaped message, they have received no signs of life from their
soldier son.
There is not a Jewish household in Israel that doesn't empathize with
their suffering. It isn't simply that most Israelis serve in the IDF
and expect their children to serve in the IDF.
It isn't just that it could happen to any of our families.
As Jews, the concept of mutual responsibility, that we are all a big
family and share a common fate, is ingrained in our collective
consciousness. And so, at a deep level, the Schalit family's suffering
is our collective suffering.
And yet, and yet, freedom exacts its price. The cause of freedom for
the Jewish people as a whole exacts a greater sacrifice from some
families than from others.
Sometimes, that sacrifice is made willingly, as in the case of the
Netanyahu family. Prof. Benzion and Tzilla Netanyahu raised their
three sons to be warriors in the fight for Jewish liberty. And all
three of their sons served in an elite commando unit. Their eldest son
Yonatan had the privilege of commanding the unit and of leading
Israeli commandos in the heroic raid to free Jewish hostages held by
the PLO in Entebbe.
There, on July 4, 1976, Yonatan and his family made the ultimate
sacrifice for the freedom of the Jewish people. Yonatan was killed in
action. His parents and brothers were left to mourn and miss him for
the rest of their lives. And yet, the Netanyahu family's sacrifice was
a product of a previous decision to fight on the front lines of the
war to preserve Jewish freedom.
Sometimes, the sacrifice is made less willingly.
Since Israel allowed the PLO and its terror armies to move their bases
from Tunis to Judea, Samaria and Gaza in 1994, nearly 2,000 Israeli
families have involuntarily paid the ultimate price for the freedom of
the Jewish people. Our freedom angers our Palestinian neighbors so
much that they have decided that all Israelis should die.
For instance Ruth Peled, 56, and her 14- month-old granddaughter Sinai
Keinan did not volunteer to make the ultimate sacrifice for the
freedom of the Jewish people when they were murdered by a Palestinian
suicide bomber as they sat in an ice cream parlor in Petah Tikva in
May 2002.
And five-year-old Gal Eisenman and her grandmother Noa Alon, 60,
weren't planning on giving their lives for the greater good when they,
together with five others, were blown to smithereens by Palestinian
terrorists in June 2002 while they were waiting for a bus in
Jerusalem.
Their mothers and daughters, Chen Keinan and Pnina Eisenman, had not
signed up for the prospect of watching their mothers and daughters
incinerated before their eyes. They did not volunteer to become
bereaved mothers and orphaned daughters simultaneously.
The lives of the victims of Arab terror were stolen from their
families simply because they lived and were Jews in Israel. And in the
cases of the Keinan, Peled, Alon and Eisenman families, as in
thousands of others, the murderers were the direct and indirect
beneficiaries of terrorists-for-hostages swaps like the deal that
Yonatan Netanyahu's brother, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, made
this week with Hamas to secure the release of Gilad Schalit.
The deal that Netanyahu has agreed to is signed with the blood of the
past victims and future victims of the terrorists he is letting go. No
amount of rationalization by Netanyahu, his cheerleaders in the
demented mass media, and by the defeatist, apparently incompetent
heads of the Shin Bet, Mossad and IDF can dent the facts.
IT IS a statistical certainty that the release of 1,027 terrorists for
Schalit will lead to the murder of untold numbers of Israelis. It has
happened every single time that these blood ransoms have been paid. It
will happen now.
Untold numbers of Israelis who are now sitting in their succas and
celebrating Jewish freedom, who are driving in their cars, who are
standing on line at the bank, who are sitting in their nursery school
classrooms painting pictures of Torah scrolls for Simhat Torah will be
killed for being Jewish while in Israel because Netanyahu has made
this deal. The unrelenting pain of their families, left to cope with
their absence, will be unimaginable.
This is a simple fact and it is beyond dispute.
It is also beyond dispute that untold numbers of IDF soldiers and
officers will be abducted and held hostage. Soldiers now training for
war or scrubbing the floors of their barracks, or sitting at a pub
with their friends on holiday leave will one day find themselves in a
dungeon in Gaza or Sinai or Lebanon undergoing unspeakable mental and
physical torture for years. Their families will suffer inhuman agony.
The only thing we don't know about these future victims is their
names. But we know what will become of them as surely as we know that
night follows day.
Netanyahu has proven once again that taking IDF soldiers hostage is a
sure bet for our Palestinian neighbors. They can murder the next batch
of Sinais and Gals, Noas and Ruths. They can kill thousands of them.
And they can do so knowing all along that all they need to do to win
immunity for their killers is kidnap a single IDF soldier.
There is no downside to this situation for those who believe all Jews
should die.
In his public statement on the Schalit deal Tuesday night, Netanyahu,
like his newfound groupies in the media, invoked the Jewish tradition
of pidyon shevuim, or the redemption of captives. But the Talmudic
writ is not unconditional. The rabbinic sages were very clear. The
ransom to be paid cannot involve the murder of other Jews.
This deal – like its predecessors – is not in line with Jewish
tradition. It stands in opposition to Jewish tradition. Even in our
darkest hours of powerlessness in the ghettos and the pales of exile,
our leaders did not agree to pay for a life with other life. Judaism
has always rejected human sacrifice.
The real question here is after five years and four months in which
Schalit has been held hostage and two-and-a-half years into
Netanyahu's current tenure as prime minister, why has the deal been
concluded now? What has changed? The answer is that very little has
changed on Netanyahu's part. After assuming office, Netanyahu
essentially accepted the contours of the abysmal agreement he has now
signed in Jewish blood.
Initially, there was a political rationale for his morally and
strategically perverse position.
He had Defense Minister Ehud Barak and the Labor Party to consider.
Supporting this deal was one of the many abject prices that Netanyahu
was expected to pay to keep Labor and Barak in his coalition.
But this rationale ended with Barak's resignation from the Labor Party
in January.
Since then, Barak and his colleagues who joined him in leaving Labor
have had no political leverage over Netanyahu.
They have nowhere to go. Their political life is wholly dependent on
their membership in Netanyahu's government. He doesn't need to pay any
price for their loyalty.
So Netanyahu's decision to sign the deal with Hamas lacks any
political rationale.
WHAT HAS really changed since the deal was first put on the table two
years ago is Hamas's position. Since the Syrian people began to rise
up against the regime of Hamas's patron and protector President Bashar
Assad, Hamas's leaders, who have been headquartered in Syria since
1998, have been looking for a way to leave. Their Muslim Brotherhood
brethren are leading forces in the Western-backed Syrian opposition.
Hamas's leaders do not want to be identified with the Brotherhood's oppressor.
With the Egyptian military junta now openly massacring Christians, and
with the Muslim Brotherhood rapidly becoming the dominant political
force in the country, Egypt has become a far more suitable home for
Hamas.
But for the past several months, Hamas leaders in Damascus have faced
a dilemma. If they stay in Syria, they lose credibility. If they
leave, they expose themselves to Israel.
According to Channel 2, in exchange for Schalit, beyond releasing a
thousand murderers, Netanyahu agreed to give safe passage to Hamas's
leaders decamping to Egypt.
What this means is that this deal is even worse for Israel than it
looks on the surface.
Not only is Israel guaranteeing a reinvigoration of the Palestinian
terror war against its civilians by freeing the most experienced
terrorists in Palestinian society, and doing so at a time when the
terror war itself is gradually escalating. Israel is squandering the
opportunity to either decapitate Hamas by killing its leaders in
transit, or to weaken the group by forcing its leaders to go down with
Assad in Syria.
At best, Netanyahu comes out of this deal looking like a weak leader
who is manipulated by and beholden to Israel's radical,
surrender-crazed media. To their eternal shame, the media have been
waging a five-year campaign to force Israel's leaders to capitulate to
Hamas.
At worst, this deal exposes Netanyahu as a morally challenged,
strategically irresponsible and foolish, opportunistic politician.
What Israel needs is a leader with the courage of one writer's
convictions. Back in 1995, that writer wrote: "The release of
convicted terrorists before they have served their full sentences
seems like an easy and tempting way of defusing blackmail situations
in which innocent people may lose their lives, but its utility is
momentary at best.
"Prisoner releases only embolden terrorists by giving them the feeling
that even if they are caught, their punishment will be brief. Worse,
by leading terrorists to think such demands are likely to be met, they
encourage precisely the terrorist blackmail they are supposed to
defuse."
The writer of those lines was then-opposition leader Binyamin
Netanyahu. Netanyahu wrote those lines in his book, Fighting
Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International
Terrorists.
Israel needs that Netanyahu to lead it. But in the face of the current
Netanyahu's abject surrender to terrorism, apparently he is gone.
caroline@carolineglick.com
By CAROLINE B. GLICK
October 14, 2011
At best, Netanyahu comes out of this deal looking like a weak leader.
At worst, he comes out as a morally challenged, irresponsible,
opportunistic politician.
No one denies the long suffering of the Schalit family. Noam and Aviva
Schalit and their relatives have endured five years and four months of
uninterrupted anguish since their son St.-Sgt. Gilad Schalit was
abducted from his army post by Palestinian terrorists and spirited to
Gaza in June 2006. Since then, aside from one letter and one
videotaped message, they have received no signs of life from their
soldier son.
There is not a Jewish household in Israel that doesn't empathize with
their suffering. It isn't simply that most Israelis serve in the IDF
and expect their children to serve in the IDF.
It isn't just that it could happen to any of our families.
As Jews, the concept of mutual responsibility, that we are all a big
family and share a common fate, is ingrained in our collective
consciousness. And so, at a deep level, the Schalit family's suffering
is our collective suffering.
And yet, and yet, freedom exacts its price. The cause of freedom for
the Jewish people as a whole exacts a greater sacrifice from some
families than from others.
Sometimes, that sacrifice is made willingly, as in the case of the
Netanyahu family. Prof. Benzion and Tzilla Netanyahu raised their
three sons to be warriors in the fight for Jewish liberty. And all
three of their sons served in an elite commando unit. Their eldest son
Yonatan had the privilege of commanding the unit and of leading
Israeli commandos in the heroic raid to free Jewish hostages held by
the PLO in Entebbe.
There, on July 4, 1976, Yonatan and his family made the ultimate
sacrifice for the freedom of the Jewish people. Yonatan was killed in
action. His parents and brothers were left to mourn and miss him for
the rest of their lives. And yet, the Netanyahu family's sacrifice was
a product of a previous decision to fight on the front lines of the
war to preserve Jewish freedom.
Sometimes, the sacrifice is made less willingly.
Since Israel allowed the PLO and its terror armies to move their bases
from Tunis to Judea, Samaria and Gaza in 1994, nearly 2,000 Israeli
families have involuntarily paid the ultimate price for the freedom of
the Jewish people. Our freedom angers our Palestinian neighbors so
much that they have decided that all Israelis should die.
For instance Ruth Peled, 56, and her 14- month-old granddaughter Sinai
Keinan did not volunteer to make the ultimate sacrifice for the
freedom of the Jewish people when they were murdered by a Palestinian
suicide bomber as they sat in an ice cream parlor in Petah Tikva in
May 2002.
And five-year-old Gal Eisenman and her grandmother Noa Alon, 60,
weren't planning on giving their lives for the greater good when they,
together with five others, were blown to smithereens by Palestinian
terrorists in June 2002 while they were waiting for a bus in
Jerusalem.
Their mothers and daughters, Chen Keinan and Pnina Eisenman, had not
signed up for the prospect of watching their mothers and daughters
incinerated before their eyes. They did not volunteer to become
bereaved mothers and orphaned daughters simultaneously.
The lives of the victims of Arab terror were stolen from their
families simply because they lived and were Jews in Israel. And in the
cases of the Keinan, Peled, Alon and Eisenman families, as in
thousands of others, the murderers were the direct and indirect
beneficiaries of terrorists-for-hostages swaps like the deal that
Yonatan Netanyahu's brother, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, made
this week with Hamas to secure the release of Gilad Schalit.
The deal that Netanyahu has agreed to is signed with the blood of the
past victims and future victims of the terrorists he is letting go. No
amount of rationalization by Netanyahu, his cheerleaders in the
demented mass media, and by the defeatist, apparently incompetent
heads of the Shin Bet, Mossad and IDF can dent the facts.
IT IS a statistical certainty that the release of 1,027 terrorists for
Schalit will lead to the murder of untold numbers of Israelis. It has
happened every single time that these blood ransoms have been paid. It
will happen now.
Untold numbers of Israelis who are now sitting in their succas and
celebrating Jewish freedom, who are driving in their cars, who are
standing on line at the bank, who are sitting in their nursery school
classrooms painting pictures of Torah scrolls for Simhat Torah will be
killed for being Jewish while in Israel because Netanyahu has made
this deal. The unrelenting pain of their families, left to cope with
their absence, will be unimaginable.
This is a simple fact and it is beyond dispute.
It is also beyond dispute that untold numbers of IDF soldiers and
officers will be abducted and held hostage. Soldiers now training for
war or scrubbing the floors of their barracks, or sitting at a pub
with their friends on holiday leave will one day find themselves in a
dungeon in Gaza or Sinai or Lebanon undergoing unspeakable mental and
physical torture for years. Their families will suffer inhuman agony.
The only thing we don't know about these future victims is their
names. But we know what will become of them as surely as we know that
night follows day.
Netanyahu has proven once again that taking IDF soldiers hostage is a
sure bet for our Palestinian neighbors. They can murder the next batch
of Sinais and Gals, Noas and Ruths. They can kill thousands of them.
And they can do so knowing all along that all they need to do to win
immunity for their killers is kidnap a single IDF soldier.
There is no downside to this situation for those who believe all Jews
should die.
In his public statement on the Schalit deal Tuesday night, Netanyahu,
like his newfound groupies in the media, invoked the Jewish tradition
of pidyon shevuim, or the redemption of captives. But the Talmudic
writ is not unconditional. The rabbinic sages were very clear. The
ransom to be paid cannot involve the murder of other Jews.
This deal – like its predecessors – is not in line with Jewish
tradition. It stands in opposition to Jewish tradition. Even in our
darkest hours of powerlessness in the ghettos and the pales of exile,
our leaders did not agree to pay for a life with other life. Judaism
has always rejected human sacrifice.
The real question here is after five years and four months in which
Schalit has been held hostage and two-and-a-half years into
Netanyahu's current tenure as prime minister, why has the deal been
concluded now? What has changed? The answer is that very little has
changed on Netanyahu's part. After assuming office, Netanyahu
essentially accepted the contours of the abysmal agreement he has now
signed in Jewish blood.
Initially, there was a political rationale for his morally and
strategically perverse position.
He had Defense Minister Ehud Barak and the Labor Party to consider.
Supporting this deal was one of the many abject prices that Netanyahu
was expected to pay to keep Labor and Barak in his coalition.
But this rationale ended with Barak's resignation from the Labor Party
in January.
Since then, Barak and his colleagues who joined him in leaving Labor
have had no political leverage over Netanyahu.
They have nowhere to go. Their political life is wholly dependent on
their membership in Netanyahu's government. He doesn't need to pay any
price for their loyalty.
So Netanyahu's decision to sign the deal with Hamas lacks any
political rationale.
WHAT HAS really changed since the deal was first put on the table two
years ago is Hamas's position. Since the Syrian people began to rise
up against the regime of Hamas's patron and protector President Bashar
Assad, Hamas's leaders, who have been headquartered in Syria since
1998, have been looking for a way to leave. Their Muslim Brotherhood
brethren are leading forces in the Western-backed Syrian opposition.
Hamas's leaders do not want to be identified with the Brotherhood's oppressor.
With the Egyptian military junta now openly massacring Christians, and
with the Muslim Brotherhood rapidly becoming the dominant political
force in the country, Egypt has become a far more suitable home for
Hamas.
But for the past several months, Hamas leaders in Damascus have faced
a dilemma. If they stay in Syria, they lose credibility. If they
leave, they expose themselves to Israel.
According to Channel 2, in exchange for Schalit, beyond releasing a
thousand murderers, Netanyahu agreed to give safe passage to Hamas's
leaders decamping to Egypt.
What this means is that this deal is even worse for Israel than it
looks on the surface.
Not only is Israel guaranteeing a reinvigoration of the Palestinian
terror war against its civilians by freeing the most experienced
terrorists in Palestinian society, and doing so at a time when the
terror war itself is gradually escalating. Israel is squandering the
opportunity to either decapitate Hamas by killing its leaders in
transit, or to weaken the group by forcing its leaders to go down with
Assad in Syria.
At best, Netanyahu comes out of this deal looking like a weak leader
who is manipulated by and beholden to Israel's radical,
surrender-crazed media. To their eternal shame, the media have been
waging a five-year campaign to force Israel's leaders to capitulate to
Hamas.
At worst, this deal exposes Netanyahu as a morally challenged,
strategically irresponsible and foolish, opportunistic politician.
What Israel needs is a leader with the courage of one writer's
convictions. Back in 1995, that writer wrote: "The release of
convicted terrorists before they have served their full sentences
seems like an easy and tempting way of defusing blackmail situations
in which innocent people may lose their lives, but its utility is
momentary at best.
"Prisoner releases only embolden terrorists by giving them the feeling
that even if they are caught, their punishment will be brief. Worse,
by leading terrorists to think such demands are likely to be met, they
encourage precisely the terrorist blackmail they are supposed to
defuse."
The writer of those lines was then-opposition leader Binyamin
Netanyahu. Netanyahu wrote those lines in his book, Fighting
Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International
Terrorists.
Israel needs that Netanyahu to lead it. But in the face of the current
Netanyahu's abject surrender to terrorism, apparently he is gone.
caroline@carolineglick.com
bs"d
Faigerayzel's alternative suggestion to free a prisoner of war without freeing terrorists.
http://shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com/2011/10/jews-are-being-banished-from-their.html
Sincerely, Robin Ticker -- - Cut all Israel funding to the PA. Announce that from now on the word Palestinians will be replaced with the word Arab throughout Israel.. Announce that Judea and Samaria is now under Jewish Law and that Temple Mount, Kever Yosef and Hebron are under Jewish Sovereignty and no longer under Arab control. Jews are and should be sovereign in these very Holy sites.
- Threaten to cut off the electricity in Gaza/,,, unless the kidnapped soldier is released within the hour
- Then take 1 or both of the terrorists that murdered the Fogels and who also decapitated the Fogel baby without remorse and put him on TV and cut off one of his/their fingers. Remind the Arabs that their electricity is about to be cut off and that terrorist fingers will be continued to be surgically removed on a timed schedule until the kidnappee is released. Continue step 3 and you can alternate with the other Fogel murderer or any terrorist that has blood on his hands. Let it be broadcast live on Arab TV. They will find it very entertaining. . .Warn them that if the kidnapped has any torture mark on his body upon release, this torture will be duplicated live on TV in kind to all terrorists in Israeli prisons. . On Israel TV show the pictures of the murdered Fogels and the decapitated baby and pictures of Daniel Perl etc in order that Israeli's remember that we learned these techniques from the Arabs and find it necessary to use it in turn as a deterrent of further terror attacks on Jews. On Arab TV tell the terrorists that you are fulfilling their innermost desire for shahidism and that their families are very proud of them. But you are sorry to disappoint them since you plan on burying/disposing their body parts with pigs so they won't have a chance to go to heaven.. Tell them that their homes and the homes of their parents are being demolished and Israel will make sure that their families will receive zero compensation from any source hostile to Israel for their acts of terror against Jews innocent victims of terror.
- If the Kidnapped soldier is still not returned then proceed to cut off their electricity and warn them that their food and water supply is at risk.
- Disarm the PA Police and take away all the textbooks in the Arab Authorities and replace them with ones that acknowledge that Israel is Sovereign over all of Judea and Samaria. Insist that any resident Jew or non Jew living within Biblical Boundaries of Israel including all of the 67 territories conquered by Israel must recognize Israel's Sovereigny and accept that Israel is the homeland of the Jewish People and they also must accept to adhere to the 7 Noahide Laws. If they do, then they have rights and will receive protection, medical benefits, education and will be welcome to stay.
- Anyone not agreeing to these terms are encouraged to leave and should choose any Arab/Muslim country or any non Muslim country that accepts them of their choice. Show them maps of the world. If no country is willing to accept them, find a barren place and send them there. There are no lack of countries and places in the world ideologically attuned to their beliefs.
- If they choose to stay in Israel and show any aggression or hostility to Israel they will pay the consequences and receive no protection. Haba Lehargecha Hashkem LeHargo. One who comes to kill you, preempt it .
Activist emails sent to my list are L'Ilui Nishmat Yisrael ben David Aryeh ob"m (Izzy - Kaplan) a great activist and lover of Eretz Yisroel, Am Yisroel and the Torah. Yehi Zichrono Baruch.
Most of these emails are posted on Shemittahrediscovered.blogspot.com
Personal emails to individuals will not be posted to my blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment